Wednesday, 31 July 2019
- [dxwg] Align all Link header requirements & examples (#1027)
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Conneg action 343
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Conneg action 343
- [dxwg] Features at risk/Implementation evidence (#1025)
- dxwg-ACTION-354: Contact ralph swick about guidance on vocabulary versioning
- [dxwg] new commits pushed by dr-shorthair
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Addressing #1023 - Fix cardinality Catalog->Record
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Addressing #1023 - Fix cardinality Catalog->Record
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Minor text tidy...
- Re: [dxwg] Minor text tidy... (#1023)
- Re: [dxwg] Minor text tidy... (#1023)
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Minor text tidy...
- Re: [dxwg] Minor editorial comments on DCAT CR candidate (#1020)
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT: Figures format and legibility (#896)
- Re: [dxwg] Links across DCAT rec, rdf files and namespace pages (#377)
- Re: [dxwg] Updated namespace file (#881)
- Re: [dxwg] [I18N] Examples provide no language or direction metadata (#958)
- Aw: Re: Agenda for CNEG subgroup telecon 2019-08-01
- Re: [dxwg] Differentiating Functional & Data Profiling in Conneg (#1022)
- Re: [dxwg] Differentiating Functional & Data Profiling in Conneg (#1022)
- [dxwg] Differentiating Functional & Data Profiling in Conneg (#1022)
- [dxwg] new commits pushed by nicholascar
Tuesday, 30 July 2019
- [dxwg] new commits pushed by agbeltran
- Re: [dxwg] Date/time clarification.. (#1012)
- Re: [dxwg] Two things that our "profiles" are not (#976)
- dxwg-ACTION-353: Ask annette_g about the small concerns she mentions in her reply to the dcat cr poll
- dxwg-ACTION-352: Ask plh about non-normative references
- [dxwg] new commits pushed by nicholascar
- Re: [dxwg] Minor editorial comments on DCAT CR candidate (#1020)
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT: Updates to ack section (#945)
- [dxwg] Pull Request: DCAT: Ack section updated
- [dxwg] Pull Request: DCAT: Ack section updated
- Re: [dxwg] Two things that our "profiles" are not (#976)
- Re: [dxwg] Conformance profiles (#1018)
- Re: [dxwg] Two things that our "profiles" are not (#976)
- DCAT sub-group call 2019.07.31T20:00:00Z
- Fwd: Reminder: Limited W3C Staff availability week of August 5-9
- Re: Agenda for CNEG subgroup telecon 2019-08-01
- [dxwg] new commits pushed by nicholascar
- Agenda for CNEG subgroup telecon 2019-08-01
- Re: [dxwg] Support for existing QSA parameter names (#511)
Monday, 29 July 2019
- Re: [dxwg] Advisability of alternative method of content negotiation (#594)
- Closed: [dxwg] Advisability of alternative method of content negotiation (#594)
- [dxwg] Minor editorial comments on DCAT CR candidate (#1020)
- Re: [dxwg] Antoine's conneg doc edits (#575)
- Closed: [dxwg] DCAT: Duplicated DATS bib entry (#895)
- Closed: [dxwg] Range of dct:type (#1009)
- Closed: [dxwg] Indicate DCAT version in the `skos:changeNote`s (#984)
- Closed: [dxwg] Harmonise notes about 'property/etc added in this revision of DCAT' (#923)
- Closed: [dxwg] dcat:Resource usage note (#980)
- Closed: [dxwg] 6.7.19 mention other data package formats (#973)
- Closed: [dxwg] Current https://raw.githubusercontent.com/w3c/dxwg/gh-pages/dcat/rdf/dcat.ttl is inconsistent (#944)
- Closed: [dxwg] vCard and FOAF? (#955)
- [dxwg] Pull Request: example as per Issue 287
- [dxwg] Pull Request: example as per Issue 287
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Conformance profiles
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Conformance profiles
- Re: [dxwg] Profiles Ont doc Security and Privacy (#479)
- DXWG Plenary: 2019-07-30T20:00:00
- [dxwg] new commits pushed by nicholascar
Saturday, 27 July 2019
- Re: [dxwg] Clarify need for unambiguous profile URIs when compound specifications referenced. (#1017)
- Re: [dxwg] Conneg Definitions (#1014)
Friday, 26 July 2019
- Re: [dxwg] Clarify need for unambiguous profile URIs when compound specifications referenced. (#1017)
- Re: [dxwg] Conneg Definitions (#1014)
- Re: [dxwg] Conneg Definitions (#1014)
Thursday, 25 July 2019
- Re: [dxwg] Clarify need for unambiguous profile URIs when compound specifications referenced. (#1017)
- Re: [dxwg] Conneg Definitions (#1014)
- Re: [dxwg] Clarify need for unambiguous profile URIs when compound specifications referenced. (#1017)
- dxwg-ACTION-351: Review antoine's comments and check if the 3pwd addresses them all
- [dxwg] Clarify need for unambiguous profile URIs when compound specifications referenced. (#1017)
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Guidance definitions
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Prof definitions
- [dxwg] Pull Request: data specification & data profile definitions updated
- Re: [dxwg] Guidance definitions (#1016)
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT: Request for clarification on dcat:endpointDescription (#960)
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT: Request for clarification on dcat:endpointDescription (#960)
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Addressing issue #725 - context for scope notes
- Re: [dxwg] Scope notes for URL properties (#972)
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Guidance definitions
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Prof definitions
- [dxwg] Pull Request: data specification & data profile definitions updated
Wednesday, 24 July 2019
- Re: [dxwg] Scope notes for URL properties (#972)
- Re: [dxwg] Scope notes for URL properties (#972)
- [dxwg] Editorial nits (#1013)
- Re: [dxwg] Addressing issue #725 (#1010)
- Re: [dxwg] Why some skos:definition for dc terms are missing in the dcat.ttl? (#983)
- Re: [dxwg] Why some skos:definition for dc terms are missing in the dcat.ttl? (#983)
- Re: [dxwg] PR Addressing issue #983 (#998)
- [dxwg] new commits pushed by riccardoAlbertoni
- Re: [dxwg] Pull addressing issue #987 (#996)
- Re: [dxwg] [I18N] References to ISO-639 vs. BCP47 (#959)
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT: Request for clarification on dcat:endpointDescription (#960)
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Data/time clarification..
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Data/time clarification..
- Re: [dxwg] Harmonise notes about 'property/etc added in this revision of DCAT' (#923)
- Re: [dxwg] Range of dct:type (#1009)
- Re: [dxwg] Addressing issue #725 (#1010)
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Some minor editorial nits in DCAT
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Some minor editorial nits in DCAT
- [dxwg] new commits pushed by nicholascar
- Closed: [dxwg] Change all occurences of "Dublin Core Terms" to "DCMI Metadata Terms" in Conneg-by-AP (#992)
Tuesday, 23 July 2019
- Re: [dxwg] Two things that our "profiles" are not (#976)
- ACTION REQUIRED: Poll on submitting DCAT draft for CR
- dxwg-ACTION-350: Issue a poll for voting on dcat
- Re: Agenda for CNEG Telecon 2019-07-25T12:00Z
- [dxwg] Pull Request: for external terms, skos:definition becomes skos:scopeNote, and 'In t…
- Re: [dxwg] Reflect all 'Usage notes' into DCAT RDF representation (#725)
- Re: [dxwg] Pull addressing issue #987 (#996)
- [dxwg] new commits pushed by agbeltran
- Re: [dxwg] Pull addressing issue #987 (#996)
- Re: [dxwg] Pull addressing issue #987 (#996)
- [dxwg] new commits pushed by davebrowning
- Agenda for CNEG Telecon 2019-07-25T12:00Z
- Re: [dxwg] A server can indicate that a response conforms to multiple profiles. [ID3] (5.3) (#287)
- Re: [dxwg] [I18N] Examples provide no language or direction metadata (#958)
- [dxwg] new commits pushed by davebrowning
- Re: [dxwg] Reflect all 'Usage notes' into DCAT RDF representation (#725)
- Re: [dxwg] Pwin edit dcat 20190425 (#913)
- Re: [dxwg] Addressing #984: inserted DCAT 2.0 in English, Italian and Spanish change notes (#997)
- Re: [dxwg] Pwin edit dcat 20190425 (#913)
Monday, 22 July 2019
- Re: [dxwg] Reflect all 'Usage notes' into DCAT RDF representation (#725)
- Re: [dxwg] Addressing #984: inserted DCAT 2.0 in English, Italian and Spanish change notes (#997)
- Re: [dxwg] Addressing #984: inserted DCAT 2.0 in English, Italian and Spanish change notes (#997)
- Re: [dxwg] Addressing #984: inserted DCAT 2.0 in English, Italian and Spanish change notes (#997)
- Re: [dxwg] Reflect all 'Usage notes' into DCAT RDF representation (#725)
- DCAT sub-group call 2019.07.24T20:00:00Z
- Re: [dxwg] Reflect all 'Usage notes' into DCAT RDF representation (#725)
- Re: [dxwg] Reflect all 'Usage notes' into DCAT RDF representation (#725)
- Re: [dxwg] Reflect all 'Usage notes' into DCAT RDF representation (#725)
- Re: [dxwg] Reflect all 'Usage notes' into DCAT RDF representation (#725)
- Re: [dxwg] Reflect all 'Usage notes' into DCAT RDF representation (#725)
Sunday, 21 July 2019
- Re: [dxwg] Reflect all 'Usage notes' into DCAT RDF representation (#725)
- DXWG Plenary 2019-07-23T20:00:00
- Re: [dxwg] Reflect all 'Usage notes' into DCAT RDF representation (#725)
Saturday, 20 July 2019
- Re: [dxwg] Reflect all 'Usage notes' into DCAT RDF representation (#725)
- Re: [dxwg] Reflect all 'Usage notes' into DCAT RDF representation (#725)
- Re: [dxwg] Reflect all 'Usage notes' into DCAT RDF representation (#725)
- Re: [dxwg] Reflect all 'Usage notes' into DCAT RDF representation (#725)
Friday, 19 July 2019
- Re: [dxwg] PR addressing issue958 (#1007)
- Re: [dxwg] PR addressing issue958 (#1007)
- Re: [dxwg] PR addressing issue958 (#1007)
- Re: [dxwg] PR addressing issue958 (#1007)
- Re: [dxwg] Reflect all 'Usage notes' into DCAT RDF representation (#725)
- [dxwg] new commits pushed by dr-shorthair
- Re: [dxwg] Add Czech translation (#936)
- Re: [dxwg] Add Czech translation (#936)
- Re: [dxwg] Reflect all 'Usage notes' into DCAT RDF representation (#725)
- Re: [dxwg] Range of dct:type (#1009)
- Re: [dxwg] Add Czech translation (#936)
- Re: [dxwg] Range of dct:type (#1009)
- Re: [dxwg] Reflect all 'Usage notes' into DCAT RDF representation (#725)
- Re: [dxwg] better link for ISO19115-1 codelist, section 13 (#975)
Thursday, 18 July 2019
- Re: [dxwg] Two things that our "profiles" are not (#976)
- Re: [dxwg] Range of dct:type (#1009)
- Re: [dxwg] Question on IETF definition of Profile (#1002)
- Re: [dxwg] Question on IETF definition of Profile (#1002)
- Re: [dxwg] Question on IETF definition of Profile (#1002)
- Re: [dxwg] Question on IETF definition of Profile (#1002)
- Re: [dxwg] Range of dct:type (#1009)
- Re: [dxwg] Two things that our "profiles" are not (#976)
- Re: [dxwg] Two things that our "profiles" are not (#976)
- Re: [dxwg] Two things that our "profiles" are not (#976)
- Re: [dxwg] Two things that our "profiles" are not (#976)
- Re: [dxwg] Range of dct:type (#1009)
- [dxwg] Range of dct:type (#1009)
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Further tweaks to distribution explanations.
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Further tweaks to distribution explanations.
- Re: [dxwg] Profiles and distributions (#531)
- [dxwg] Pull Request: PR addressing issue958
- [dxwg] Pull Request: PR addressing issue958
- Re: [dxwg] better link for ISO19115-1 codelist, section 13 (#975)
- Re: [dxwg] Links to ISO-19115-1... (#1001)
- Re: [dxwg] Romanian translation of DCAT (#927)
- Re: [dxwg] Add Czech translation (#936)
- Fw: Agenda for CNEG meeting 2019-07-18
- Re: [dxwg] adding the Italian translation for the scope note mentioned in issue 980 (#1004)
- Re: [dxwg] adding the Italian translation for the scope note mentioned in issue 980 (#1004)
- [dxwg] new commits pushed by davebrowning
- Re: [dxwg] adding the Italian translation for the scope note mentioned in issue 980 (#1004)
- [dxwg] new commits pushed by davebrowning
- Re: [dxwg] adding the Italian translation for the scope note mentioned in issue 980 (#1004)
- Closed: [dxwg] notes on 6.15.4 and 6.15.5 latitute and longitude (#974)
- Re: [dxwg] adding the Italian translation for the scope note mentioned in issue 980 (#1004)
- Closed: [dxwg] Basic Geo vocabulary considerations (#970)
- Closed: [dxwg] DCAT: ODRL CG review (#949)
- Closed: [dxwg] dcat:compressFormat and dcat:packageFormat description inconsistency (#935)
- Closed: [dxwg] URL/URI inconsistency in dcat:endpointURL comment (#934)
- Closed: [dxwg] Segregate namespaces into normative and non-normative sets (#968)
- Closed: [dxwg] dcat conformance question (#967)
- Closed: [dxwg] dcat:Resource description edits, section 5.1 (#966)
- Re: [dxwg] adding the Italian translation for the scope note mentioned in issue 980 (#1004)
- RE: DCAT sub-group call 2019.07.17T20:00:00Z
- RE: DCAT sub-group call 2019.07.17T20:00:00Z
- Re: [dxwg] adding the Italian translation for the scope note mentioned in issue 980 (#1004)
Wednesday, 17 July 2019
- [dxwg] new commits pushed by agbeltran
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Fixing syntax issues for issue 980
- Re: [dxwg] Pull addressing issue #987 (#996)
- Re: [dxwg] Why some skos:definition for dc terms are missing in the dcat.ttl? (#983)
- [dxwg] new commits pushed by agbeltran
- Re: [dxwg] Changes to scopeNote for dcat:Resource according to issue #980 (#1003)
- Re: [dxwg] Changes to scopeNote for dcat:Resource according to issue #980 (#1003)
- Re: [dxwg] Current https://raw.githubusercontent.com/w3c/dxwg/gh-pages/dcat/rdf/dcat.ttl is inconsistent (#944)
- Re: [dxwg] Fix two minor issues that were preventing OWLAPI loading dcat.ttl (#1006)
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Fix two minor issues that were preventing OWLAPI loading dcat.ttl
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Fix two minor issues that were preventing OWLAPI loading dcat.ttl
- Re: [dxwg] Current https://raw.githubusercontent.com/w3c/dxwg/gh-pages/dcat/rdf/dcat.ttl is inconsistent (#944)
- Re: [dxwg] Current https://raw.githubusercontent.com/w3c/dxwg/gh-pages/dcat/rdf/dcat.ttl is inconsistent (#944)
- Re: [dxwg] Current https://raw.githubusercontent.com/w3c/dxwg/gh-pages/dcat/rdf/dcat.ttl is inconsistent (#944)
- Re: [dxwg] Current https://raw.githubusercontent.com/w3c/dxwg/gh-pages/dcat/rdf/dcat.ttl is inconsistent (#944)
- Re: [dxwg] Current https://raw.githubusercontent.com/w3c/dxwg/gh-pages/dcat/rdf/dcat.ttl is inconsistent (#944)
- Re: [dxwg] Pull addressing issue #987 (#996)
- Re: [dxwg] Changes to scopeNote for dcat:Resource according to issue #980 (#1003)
- Re: [dxwg] Changes to scopeNote for dcat:Resource according to issue #980 (#1003)
- [dxwg] Pull Request: PR accepting suggestion in issue #973
- [dxwg] Pull Request: PR accepting suggestion in issue #973
- Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963)
- Re: [dxwg] Links to ISO-19115-1... (#1001)
- Re: [dxwg] Fixing syntax issues for issue 980 (#1004)
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Fixing syntax issues for issue 980
- Re: [dxwg] Addressing #984: inserted DCAT 2.0 in English, Italian and Spanish change notes (#997)
- Re: [dxwg] Two things that our "profiles" are not (#976)
- Re: [dxwg] Question on IETF definition of Profile (#1002)
- Re: [dxwg] Two things that our "profiles" are not (#976)
Tuesday, 16 July 2019
- Re: [dxwg] better link for ISO19115-1 codelist, section 13 (#975)
- Re: [dxwg] Changes to scopeNote for dcat:Resource according to issue #980 (#1003)
- Re: [dxwg] Addressing #984: inserted DCAT 2.0 in English, Italian and Spanish change notes (#997)
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Changes to scopeNote for dcat:Resource according to issue #980
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Changes to scopeNote for dcat:Resource according to issue #980
- Re: [dxwg] dcat:Resource usage note (#980)
- Re: [dxwg] dcat:Resource usage note (#980)
- Re: [dxwg] dcat:Resource usage note (#980)
- Re: [dxwg] Addressing #984: inserted DCAT 2.0 in English, Italian and Spanish change notes (#997)
- [dxwg] new commits pushed by davebrowning
- Re: [dxwg] Completing the Spanish translations + other fixes to dcat.ttl (#981)
- Re: [dxwg] Provide a pathway for referencing profiles embedded in documents with broader scope. (#990)
- Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963)
- [dxwg] Question on IETF definition of Profile (#1002)
- Re: [dxwg] refining the definition of profile in response to the poll (#989)
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Links to ISO-19115-1...
- Re: [dxwg] Completing the Spanish translations + other fixes to dcat.ttl (#981)
- Re: [dxwg] refining the definition of profile in response to the poll (#989)
- Resolution from poll
- Re: [dxwg] Completing the Spanish translations + other fixes to dcat.ttl (#981)
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Links to ISO-19115-1...
- Re: [dxwg] refining the definition of profile in response to the poll (#989)
- DCAT sub-group call 2019.07.17T20:00:00Z
- [dxwg] Add text to clarify that profile URIs don't have to resolve (#1000)
- [dxwg] new commits pushed by davebrowning
- [dxwg] new commits pushed by davebrowning
- Agenda for CNEG meeting 2019-07-18
- Re: [dxwg] refining the definition of profile in response to the poll (#989)
- Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963)
Monday, 15 July 2019
- Re: [dxwg] refining the definition of profile in response to the poll (#989)
- Re: [dxwg] vCard and FOAF? (#955)
- Re: [dxwg] URL/URI inconsistency in dcat:endpointURL comment (#934)
- [dxwg] Pull Request: PR to address issue #934
- [dxwg] Pull Request: PR to address issue #934
- Re: [dxwg] refining the definition of profile in response to the poll (#989)
- Poll on definition - please review
- Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963)
- Re: [dxwg] Why some skos:definition for dc terms are missing in the dcat.ttl? (#983)
- Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963)
- [dxwg] Pull Request: PR Addressing issue #983
- [dxwg] Pull Request: PR Addressing issue #983
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Addressing #984: inserted DCAT 2.0 in English, Italian and Spanish change notes
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Addressing #984: inserted DCAT 2.0 in English, Italian and Spanish change notes
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Pull addressing issue #987
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Pull addressing issue #987
- Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963)
- Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963)
- Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963)
- Re: [dxwg] Update index.html (#994)
- Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963)
- [dxwg] new commits pushed by rob-metalinkage
- [dxwg] new commits pushed by rob-metalinkage
- Closed: [dxwg] Consider requirements for specifying the order in which content negotiation is performed (#500)
- [dxwg] new commits pushed by rob-metalinkage
Sunday, 14 July 2019
- Re: [dxwg] refining the definition of profile in response to the poll (#989)
- Re: [dxwg] refining the definition of profile in response to the poll (#989)
- Re: [dxwg] refining the definition of profile in response to the poll (#989)
- Re: poll on 'profile'
- Re: [dxwg] refining the definition of profile in response to the poll (#989)
- DXWG Plenary Meeting: 2019-07-16T20:00:00
- [dxwg] new commits pushed by nicholascar
- [dxwg] new commits pushed by nicholascar
- Closed: [dxwg] Incorrect reference to PROF-IETF in conneg-by-ap (#954)
- [dxwg] new commits pushed by nicholascar
- Re: [dxwg] refining the definition of profile in response to the poll (#989)
- Re: [dxwg] Provide a pathway for referencing profiles embedded in documents with broader scope. (#990)
Saturday, 13 July 2019
- Re: poll on 'profile'
- Re: [dxwg] refining the definition of profile in response to the poll (#989)
- Re: [dxwg] Provide a pathway for referencing profiles embedded in documents with broader scope. (#990)
- Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963)
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Update config.js
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Update config.js
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Update index.html
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Update index.html
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Update index.html
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Update index.html
- Re: [dxwg] refining the definition of profile in response to the poll (#989)
- Re: [dxwg] refining the definition of profile in response to the poll (#989)
- Re: [dxwg] refining the definition of profile in response to the poll (#989)
- Re: [dxwg] Provide a pathway for referencing profiles embedded in documents with broader scope. (#990)
- Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963)
Friday, 12 July 2019
- Re: [dxwg] Basic Geo vocabulary considerations (#970)
- Re: [dxwg] refining the definition of profile in response to the poll (#989)
- Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963)
- [dxwg] new commits pushed by agbeltran
- Re: [dxwg] refining the definition of profile in response to the poll (#989)
- Re: [dxwg] refining the definition of profile in response to the poll (#989)
- Re: [dxwg] refining the definition of profile in response to the poll (#989)
- Re: [dxwg] refining the definition of profile in response to the poll (#989)
- Re: [dxwg] refining the definition of profile in response to the poll (#989)
- Re: [dxwg] refining the definition of profile in response to the poll (#989)
- Re: [dxwg] refining the definition of profile in response to the poll (#989)
- Re: [dxwg] refining the definition of profile in response to the poll (#989)
- Re: [dxwg] refining the definition of profile in response to the poll (#989)
- Re: [dxwg] refining the definition of profile in response to the poll (#989)
- Re: [dxwg] refining the definition of profile in response to the poll (#989)
- Re: [dxwg] Provide a pathway for referencing profiles embedded in documents with broader scope. (#990)
- [dxwg] Change all occurences of "Dublin Core Terms" to "DCMI Metadata Terms" in Conneg-by-AP (#992)
- Re: [dxwg] refining the definition of profile in response to the poll (#989)
- Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963)
- [dxwg] Pull Request: removed contentious statements about nature of DCMI documents
- [dxwg] Pull Request: removed contentious statements about nature of DCMI documents
- [dxwg] Provide a pathway for referencing profiles embedded in documents with broader scope. (#990)
- Re: [dxwg] Remove w3cgeo lat/long/alt recommendation (#988)
- poll on 'profile'
- [dxwg] refining the definition of profile in response to the poll (#989)
Thursday, 11 July 2019
- Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963)
- Re: [dxwg] dcat:Resource usage note (#980)
- Re: [dxwg] dcat:compressFormat and dcat:packageFormat description inconsistency (#935)
- Re: [dxwg] dcat:compressFormat and dcat:packageFormat description inconsistency (#935)
- Poll reminder
- Fw: Agenda for CNEG Telecon 2019-07-11
- Re: [dxwg] Support for existing QSA parameter names (#511)
- Re: [dxwg] QSA Profile Conneg realisation must support QSA discovery (#538)
- Re: [dxwg] Determine responsibilities for listing available profiles when a redirect is used (#603)
- Re: [dxwg] A server can indicate that a response conforms to multiple profiles. [ID3] (5.3) (#287)
- dxwg-ACTION-349: Move text from ietf to conneg draft for #500
- dxwg-ACTION-348: Create pr with real examples to solve #287
- dxwg-ACTION-347: Create new gh issue explaining the problem of redirects and refer to that issue in the wd
- Re: [dxwg] Segregate namespaces into normative and non-normative sets (#968)
- [dxwg] new commits pushed by davebrowning
- RE: DCAT sub-group call 2019.07.10T20:00:00Z
- [dxwg] new commits pushed by davebrowning
- Re: [dxwg] notes on 6.15.4 and 6.15.5 latitute and longitude (#974)
- [dxwg] new commits pushed by davebrowning
- Re: [dxwg] dcat:Resource usage note (#980)
- Re: [dxwg] Why some skos:definition for dc terms are missing in the dcat.ttl? (#983)
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Remove w3cgeo lat/long/alt recommendation
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Remove w3cgeo lat/long/alt recommendation
Wednesday, 10 July 2019
- Re: [dxwg] Current https://raw.githubusercontent.com/w3c/dxwg/gh-pages/dcat/rdf/dcat.ttl is inconsistent (#944)
- Re: [dxwg] dcat:compressFormat and dcat:packageFormat description inconsistency (#935)
- Re: [dxwg] dcat:compressFormat and dcat:packageFormat description inconsistency (#935)
- dxwg-ACTION-346: Process w3cgeo point changes
- dxwg-ACTION-345: Draft response on language tags
- dxwg-ACTION-344: Draft response to renato on vcard issue
- Re: [dxwg] Addressing feedback (in issue #935) (#986)
- Re: [dxwg] dcat:compressFormat and dcat:packageFormat description inconsistency (#935)
- Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963)
- Closed: [dxwg] dcat.ttl - editorialNotes (#920)
- Closed: [dxwg] DCAT: Inconsistent use of "profile" / "application profile" (#937)
- Closed: [dxwg] DCAT: Subtitle not included in SpecRef entries (#939)
- Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963)
- Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963)
- Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963)
- Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963)
- Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963)
- Re: Poll on proposal for definition of 'profile' for use with CONNEG and DCAT
- Re: [dxwg] dcat:Resource usage note (#980)
- Re: [dxwg] dcat:Resource usage note (#980)
- Re: [dxwg] URL/URI inconsistency in dcat:endpointURL comment (#934)
- Re: [dxwg] dcat:Resource usage note (#980)
- Re: [dxwg] dcat:Resource usage note (#980)
- [dxwg] usage note and definition for odrl:hasPolicy need to be updated in TTL (#987)
- Re: [dxwg] URL/URI inconsistency in dcat:endpointURL comment (#934)
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Addressing feedback in issue #935
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Addressing feedback in issue #935
- Aw: DXWG priorities
- Agenda for CNEG Telecon 2019-07-11
- Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963)
- Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963)
- Poll on proposal for definition of 'profile' for use with CONNEG and DCAT
- Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963)
- Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963)
- Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963)
- Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963)
- Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963)
- Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963)
- Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963)
- Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963)
- DXWG priorities
- Re: [dxwg] Why some skos:definition for dc terms are missing in the dcat.ttl? (#983)
- Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963)
- Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963)
- Definition of "profile" - updated
- Re: [dxwg] Indicate DCAT version in the `skos:changeNote`s (#984)
- Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963)
- Re: [dxwg] New UC - Specification documents with multiple roles (#978)
- Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963)
- Re: [dxwg] New UC - Specification documents with multiple roles (#978)
- Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963)
- Re: [dxwg] New UC - Specification documents with multiple roles (#978)
- Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963)
Tuesday, 9 July 2019
- Re: [dxwg] New UC - Specification documents with multiple roles (#978)
- Re: [dxwg] New UC - Specification documents with multiple roles (#978)
- Re: [dxwg] [I18N] References to ISO-639 vs. BCP47 (#959)
- DCAT sub-group call 2019.07.10T20:00:00Z
- Re: [dxwg] New UC - Specification documents with multiple roles (#978)
- Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963)
- Re: [dxwg] [I18N] References to ISO-639 vs. BCP47 (#959)
- Re: [dxwg] New UC - Specification documents with multiple roles (#978)
- Re: [dxwg] New UC - Specification documents with multiple roles (#978)
- Re: [dxwg] New UC - Specification documents with multiple roles (#978)
- Re: [dxwg] New UC - Specification documents with multiple roles (#978)
- Re: [dxwg] New UC - Specification documents with multiple roles (#978)
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Completing dcat.ttl translation in italian
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Completing dcat.ttl translation in italian
- Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963)
- Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963)
- Re: [dxwg] Indicate DCAT version in the `skos:changeNote`s (#984)
- [dxwg] Indicate DCAT version in the `skos:changeNote`s (#984)
- Re: [dxwg] [I18N] References to ISO-639 vs. BCP47 (#959)
- Re: [dxwg] Why some skos:definition for dc terms are missing in the dcat.ttl? (#983)
- Re: [dxwg] New UC - Specification documents with multiple roles (#978)
- Re: [dxwg] [I18N] References to ISO-639 vs. BCP47 (#959)
- Re: [dxwg] [I18N] References to ISO-639 vs. BCP47 (#959)
- Re: [dxwg] Two things that our "profiles" are not (#976)
- Re: [dxwg] [I18N] References to ISO-639 vs. BCP47 (#959)
- Re: [dxwg] Why some skos:definition for dc terms are missing in the dcat.ttl? (#983)
- [dxwg] Why some skos:definition for dc terms are missing in the dcat.ttl? (#983)
- Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963)
- [dxwg] Pull Request: PR for issue #966
- [dxwg] Pull Request: PR for issue #966
Monday, 8 July 2019
- Re: [dxwg] Current https://raw.githubusercontent.com/w3c/dxwg/gh-pages/dcat/rdf/dcat.ttl is inconsistent (#944)
- Re: [dxwg] Current https://raw.githubusercontent.com/w3c/dxwg/gh-pages/dcat/rdf/dcat.ttl is inconsistent (#944)
- Re: [dxwg] Current https://raw.githubusercontent.com/w3c/dxwg/gh-pages/dcat/rdf/dcat.ttl is inconsistent (#944)
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Add Czech translation
- Re: [dxwg] New UC - Specification documents with multiple roles (#978)
Sunday, 7 July 2019
- Re: [dxwg] Two things that our "profiles" are not (#976)
- Re: [dxwg] Completing the Spanish translations (#981)
- Re: [dxwg] Completing the Spanish translations (#981)
- Re: [dxwg] Two things that our "profiles" are not (#976)
- DXWG Plenary meeting: 2019-07-09T20:00:00
Saturday, 6 July 2019
- Re: [dxwg] Completing the Spanish translations (#981)
- Fwd: Dataset Exchange Working Group Charter Extended
Friday, 5 July 2019
- Re: [dxwg] Two things that our "profiles" are not (#976)
- Re: [dxwg] Two things that our "profiles" are not (#976)
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Completing the Spanish translations
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Completing the Spanish translations
- [dxwg] dcat:Resource usage note (#980)
- [dxwg] Change owl:versionInfo (#979)
- Re: [dxwg] Basic Geo vocabulary considerations (#970)
- Re: [dxwg] Two things that our "profiles" are not (#976)
- Re: [dxwg] Two things that our "profiles" are not (#976)
- Re: [dxwg] New UC - Specification documents with multiple roles (#978)
- Re: [dxwg] New UC - Specification documents with multiple roles (#978)
- Re: [dxwg] better link for ISO19115-1 codelist, section 13 (#975)
- Re: [dxwg] dcat:Resource description edits, section 5.1 (#966)
- Re: [dxwg] Split namespace table into normative and non-normative (#969)
- Re: [dxwg] better link for ISO19115-1 codelist, section 13 (#975)
- Dataset Exchange Working Group Charter Extended until 31 December 2019
Thursday, 4 July 2019
- Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963)
- Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963)
- Re: [dxwg] Two things that our "profiles" are not (#976)
- [dxwg] New UC - Specification documents with multiple roles (#978)
- Re: [dxwg] better link for ISO19115-1 codelist, section 13 (#975)
- Re: [dxwg] Two things that our "profiles" are not (#976)
- Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963)
- Re: [dxwg] Split namespace table into normative and non-normative (#969)
- Re: [dxwg] Basic Geo vocabulary considerations (#970)
- Re: [dxwg] better link for ISO19115-1 codelist, section 13 (#975)
- Re: [dxwg] A server can indicate that a response conforms to multiple profiles. [ID3] (5.3) (#287)
- Fw: Agenda for CNEG subgroup meeting 2019-07-04T12:00:00Z
- Re: [dxwg] A server can indicate that a response conforms to multiple profiles. [ID3] (5.3) (#287)
- dxwg-ACTION-343: Update qsa documentation with an equivalent to getcapabilities
- [dxwg] Pull Request: adding cataloged resources explicitly ( for issue #967)
- [dxwg] Pull Request: adding cataloged resources explicitly ( for issue #967)
Wednesday, 3 July 2019
- Re: [dxwg] Basic Geo vocabulary considerations (#970)
- Re: [dxwg] Range of dcat:endpointURL (#655)
- Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963)
- Re: [dxwg] Range of dcat:endpointURL (#655)
- Re: [dxwg] Scope notes for URL properties (#972)
- Re: [dxwg] Two things that our "profiles" are not (#976)
- Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963)
- Re: [dxwg] dcat conformance question (#967)
- Re: [dxwg] [I18N] References to ISO-639 vs. BCP47 (#959)
- Re: [dxwg] dcat:Resource description edits, section 5.1 (#966)
- Aw: Re: Trying to articulate our various "profiles"
- Re: Trying to articulate our various "profiles"
- Re: [dxwg] [I18N] References to ISO-639 vs. BCP47 (#959)
- Re: [dxwg] [I18N] References to ISO-639 vs. BCP47 (#959)
- Re: [dxwg] dcat conformance question (#967)
- Re: [dxwg] Basic Geo vocabulary considerations (#970)
- Re: [dxwg] Two things that our "profiles" are not (#976)
- Re: [dxwg] Two things that our "profiles" are not (#976)
- Agenda for CNEG subgroup meeting 2019-07-04T12:00:00Z
- Re: [dxwg] Two things that our "profiles" are not (#976)
- RE: Trying to articulate our various "profiles"
- Re: [dxwg] Scope notes for URL properties (#972)
- Re: [dxwg] Range of dcat:endpointURL (#655)
- Re: [dxwg] better link for ISO19115-1 codelist, section 13 (#975)
Tuesday, 2 July 2019
- Re: [dxwg] Two things that our "profiles" are not (#976)
- Vocbench and DCAT V2 draft
- Re: EntitySchemas in Wikidata
- [dxwg] Two things that our profiles are not (#976)
- Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963)
- Re: [dxwg] JSON examples (#971)
- Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963)
- Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963)
- dxwg-ACTION-342: Start a fresh gh issue.
- Re: [dxwg] dcat:Resource description edits, section 5.1 (#966)
- Re: [dxwg] dcat:Resource description edits, section 5.1 (#966)
- Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963)
- Re: [dxwg] dcat:Resource description edits, section 5.1 (#966)
- Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963)
- Re: EntitySchemas in Wikidata
- Re: EntitySchemas in Wikidata
- Re: EntitySchemas in Wikidata
- [dxwg] better link for ISO19115-1 codelist, section 13 (#975)
- Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963)
- Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963)
- Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963)
- Re: Narrowing down profile definition choices
- [dxwg] notes on 6.15.4 and 6.15.5 latituge and longitude (#974)
- Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963)
- Re: [dxwg] JSON examples (#971)
- Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963)
- [dxwg] 6.7.19 mention other data package formats (#973)
- Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963)
- Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963)
- Re: [dxwg] Range of dcat:endpointURL (#655)
- [dxwg] Scope notes for URL properties (#972)
- Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963)
- Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963)
- Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963)
- Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963)
- Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963)
- Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963)
- Re: Trying to articulate our various "profiles"
- Re: [dxwg] [I18N] References to ISO-639 vs. BCP47 (#959)
- Re: [dxwg] dcat:Resource description edits, section 5.1 (#966)
- Re: [dxwg] dcat:Resource description edits, section 5.1 (#966)
- Re: [dxwg] dcat:Resource description edits, section 5.1 (#966)
- Re: [dxwg] dcat:Resource description edits, section 5.1 (#966)
- Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963)
- Re: [dxwg] dcat:Resource description edits, section 5.1 (#966)
- Re: [dxwg] dcat:Resource description edits, section 5.1 (#966)
- Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963)
- Re: [dxwg] JSON examples (#971)
- Re: [dxwg] dcat:Resource description edits, section 5.1 (#966)
- Closed: [dxwg] DCAT: s/getCapabilities/GetCapabilities/ (#961)
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT: s/getCapabilities/GetCapabilities/ (#961)
- Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963)
- [dxwg] JSON examples (#971)
- Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963)
- Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963)
- Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963)
- Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963)
- Re: [dxwg] Basic Geo vocabulary considerations (#970)
- [dxwg] Basic Geo vocabulary considerations (#970)
- Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963)
Monday, 1 July 2019
- Re: [dxwg] dcat:Resource description edits, section 5.1 (#966)
- Re: [dxwg] dcat:Resource description edits, section 5.1 (#966)
- Re: Narrowing down profile definition choices
- Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963)
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT: s/getCapabilities/GetCapabilities/ (#961)
- Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963)
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT: s/getCapabilities/GetCapabilities/ (#961)
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT: s/getCapabilities/GetCapabilities/ (#961)
- Re: [dxwg] dcat:Resource description edits, section 5.1 (#966)
- Re: [dxwg] dcat:Resource description edits, section 5.1 (#966)
- Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963)
- Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963)
- Narrowing down profile definition choices
- Re: [dxwg] dcat:Resource description edits, section 5.1 (#966)
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Split namespace table into normative and non-normative
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Split namespace table into normative and non-normative
- Re: [dxwg] dcat conformance question (#967)
- Re: [dxwg] dcat conformance question (#967)
- Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963)
- Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963)
- [dxwg] Segregate namespaces into normative and non-normative sets (#968)
- Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963)
- Re: [dxwg] Registration of target attribute "profile" for the Link-Header (#501)
- Closed: [dxwg] Replace prov#Role with #Class:Relationship for hadRole (#962)
- Re: [dxwg] Replace prov#Role with #Class:Relationship for hadRole (#962)
- [dxwg] new commits pushed by riccardoAlbertoni
- Re: [dxwg] dcat conformance question (#967)
- EntitySchemas in Wikidata
- Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963)
- Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963)
- Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963)
- Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963)
- Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963)
- DXWG Plenary - 2019-07-02T20:00:00
- Re: [dxwg] dcat conformance question (#967)