Re: [dxwg] Further elaborating class Organization/Person (#765)

I wasn't aware that I was responsible for "sufficient" in that usage note -- on the contrary, I have argued in the past that FOAF does *not* provide sufficient properties to properly describe people and organisations. 
So I am happy to drop that word.

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by makxdekkers
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/765#issuecomment-482166532 using your GitHub account

Received on Thursday, 11 April 2019 15:38:21 UTC