- From: Simon Cox via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2018 03:05:01 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
The ontological commitment of the range of dct:license does not appear onerous to me. dct:LicenseDocument is a subclass of dct:RightsStatement, which is just an rdfs:Resource. So use of dct:license merely says that the thing that it points to is classified as LicenseDocument from the viewpoint of DCMI worldview, which does not appear to add any problematic entailments. -- GitHub Notification of comment by dr-shorthair Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/114#issuecomment-367552720 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 22 February 2018 03:05:03 UTC