- From: makxdekkers via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2018 18:14:56 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
@dr-shorthair @philarcher I am a little uneasy about the idea to have two versions of DCAT, e.g. DCAT-loose where domains and ranges are only suggestions, and DCAT-tight where domains and ranges are axioms. As it is, DCAT version 1 has proven to be extremely useful and I don't understand why we seem to be drifting in a direction that goes toward fundamental redesign. Yes, there are things that are missing, things that don't work very well and things that need more explanation. I hope we can concentrate on making it better, and not try to create something different. For example, I have heard no-one in the implementer community I know asking to get rid of domains and ranges. I am really not in favour of relaxing the rules because some people violate them and then penalising people who did the 'right' thing. -- GitHub Notification of comment by makxdekkers Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/110#issuecomment-366769200 using your GitHub account
Received on Monday, 19 February 2018 18:14:59 UTC