- From: Andrea Perego via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2018 09:38:44 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
Good point, @makxdekkers . I think both options apply. It is to be seen whether this can be achieved just with 1 property, or we may need 2 different ones. For instance, supposing we have a property `dcat:catalog`, inverse of `dcat:record`, the scenario you mention could be addressed as follows: ````turtle a:Catalogue a dcat:Catalog . the:SourceCatalogue a dcat:Catalog . a:Record a dcat:CatalogRecord ; dcat:catalog a:Catalogue ; dct:source the:SourceRecord . the:SourceRecord a dcat:CatalogRecord ; dcat:catalog the:SourceCatalogue . ```` In this case, the property you mention, namely, `dcat:sourceCatalog`, can be seen as equivalent to a composition/chain of (the hypotetical) properties `dct:source`/`dcat:catalog`. -- GitHub Notification of comment by andrea-perego Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/132#issuecomment-366187069 using your GitHub account
Received on Friday, 16 February 2018 09:38:47 UTC