- From: Stephane Fellah <stephanef@imagemattersllc.com>
- Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2018 14:56:14 -0500
- To: makxdekkers via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Cc: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
Received on Thursday, 15 February 2018 19:56:39 UTC
I would remove the dcat:Distribution domain constraints. I have used dcat:Distribution to represent distributions of Map and Layer (which are not modeled as subclass of dcat:Dataset but as a subclass of Asset (itself subclass of srim:Item). On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 3:37 AM, makxdekkers via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org> wrote: > I would vote to keep the domain and range here -- this property is one of > the properties that are part of the backbone structure of DCAT: > Catalog > dataset > Dataset > distribution > Distribution > > -- > GitHub Notification of comment by makxdekkers > Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/is > sues/120#issuecomment-365858551 using your GitHub account > > -- Stephane Fellah Chief Knowledge Scientist Image Matters LLC Office: +(703) 669 5510 Cell: 703 431 9420
Received on Thursday, 15 February 2018 19:56:39 UTC