- From: Nicholas Car via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2018 22:58:02 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
@jpullmann yes, we have used the `foaf:member` inv. `org:memberOf` in the past. It's nice to have the property pointing from the Agent to the Org but we cal live with foaf-only and use the inverse. Regarding FOAF/ORG use: on reflection, perhaps it's fine to just point to `foaf:Agent` for related agents, given that they are also `org:Agent`s and leave outside of DXWG scope any properties of the Agent, which would be the territory of FOAF/ORG. As long as we establish a good pattern of qualified Dataset -> Agent relations so we are not bound to a few dct properties like creator. Dealing with `prov:Agent` might to be harder but perhaps need not be. Clearly a `prov:Agent` is just a superset of `foaf:Agent`. -- GitHub Notification of comment by nicholascar Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/111#issuecomment-365773187 using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 14 February 2018 22:58:52 UTC