Re: [dxwg] dcat:Dataset type

Yes - PR is a first step. I've made the necessary change to the RDF, and also to section 6 in the Rec document. 

The discussion and examples in section 5 need more work: in particular how to use classifiers from type vocabularies where the items do not have individual URIs.  I think it is useful to merge this PR, but leave #64 open until the requirement has been fully satisfied with more documentation and examples. 

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by dr-shorthair
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/pull/108#issuecomment-365421835 using your GitHub account

Received on Tuesday, 13 February 2018 22:08:54 UTC