- From: Ruben Verborgh <Ruben.Verborgh@UGent.be>
- Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2018 16:11:26 +0000
- To: "kcoyle@kcoyle.net" <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>
- CC: "public-dxwg-wg@w3.org" <public-dxwg-wg@w3.org>
Dear all, This definition seems to cover really well what we need. I like it! Just one question: > any implementing subclasses of datatypes I don't fully understand this phrasing (but that might be something on my part). What do we mean with "any implementing subclasses"? I would have expected “implemented”. Also one suggestion: can we add “structure” to the list of constraints? Or is that contained in “options and parameters”? > The requirement that the definition be contrasted to mime types I think the definition covers that pretty well: there is no mention of “syntax”. Best, Ruben
Received on Wednesday, 7 February 2018 16:12:44 UTC