- From: Eric Stephan <ericphb@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 23:05:52 -0700
- To: Rob Atkinson <rob@metalinkage.com.au>
- Cc: "public-dxwg-wg@w3.org" <public-dxwg-wg@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 31 May 2017 06:06:26 UTC
Hi Rob, I am one of the editors of the DUV technical note and participated in the W3C PROV (Sumit Purohit also a member of our working group is also in our DXWG working group). During the Data on the Web Best Practices first F2F meeting the PROV-O -DUV connection was our initial inclination as well. However as use cases and resulting requirements evolved the concept of usage focused on: citation, feedback, and information describing how datasets (and dataset distributions) are used. These requirements tended to be oriented more toward annotation and publication instead of oriented to describing data lineage, processing history, or influence. It is also important to note that in a way, the DUV was an attempt at filling in some current gaps in DCAT 1.0. I'm pushing a deadline in the next 24 hours, but will be happy to discuss any of these aspects in further detail. Does this help? Thanks, Eric Stephan On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 5:40 PM, Rob Atkinson <rob@metalinkage.com.au> wrote: > Looking through the UC materials I scanned the Data Usage Vocabulary [1] > and was expecting it to have some alignment with the PROV-O scope - but its > not very obvious. > > Has anyone got any further information or perspectives on the relationship > here? > > Rob Atkinson > >
Received on Wednesday, 31 May 2017 06:06:26 UTC