- From: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
- Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2017 06:45:09 +0200
- To: <public-dxwg-wg@w3.org>
Hi Karen, Thanks for the feedback let's keep it an issue for now then :-) I have also added it to a case that Riccardo created, as an umbrella for DQV-related work, which could be relevant for the group: https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/wiki/Use_Case_Working_Space#Data_Quality_Vocabulary_.28DQV.29_Wish_List_left_by_the_DWBP_WG Cheers, Antoine On 18/06/17 20:14, Karen Coyle wrote: > Hi, Antoine. You may have just set the policy ;-). > > Is there any way that this can become a use case? That would make it > visible during upcoming discussions. > > kc > > On 6/18/17 9:57 AM, Antoine Isaac wrote: >> Dear all, >> >> It is not clear to me how update and maintenance of DQV is in scope for >> our working group. But there is a need, if just for the following issue >> that I have created. >> https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/5 >> >> Btw I hope I'm not hereby messing with the group's issue policy. But as >> this is the first (visible) issue, I guess there's no such policy now :-) >> >> Kind regards, >> >> Antoine >> >> >
Received on Monday, 26 June 2017 04:45:46 UTC