RE: W3C dxwg Use Cases

Hi Andrea,

You make a good point, about pulling stakeholders out as a specific entry for easier identification/classification.

If we do it, I just want to be sure we don't lose their role/experiences in the narrative of the problem statement.  From my perspective that's important to understanding the problem better.

If everyone understands and agrees with both of these points and has not objections or questions, we can add the additional field.

Thanks,
ixchel

From: andrea.perego@ec.europa.eu [mailto:andrea.perego@ec.europa.eu]
Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2017 12:52 PM
To: Faniel,Ixchel <fanielI@oclc.org>
Cc: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
Subject: RE: W3C dxwg Use Cases

Dear Faniel,

About point (2) - i.e., stakeholders - I wonder whether it would be worth adding a specific entry in the template, for easier identification / classification of the use case scope.

The use case description - especially the problem statement - is in most cases narrative text where the information about the relevant stakeholders may be difficult to find.

Cheers,

Andrea

----
Andrea Perego, Ph.D.
Scientific / Technical Project Officer
European Commission DG JRC
Directorate B - Growth and Innovation
Unit B6 - Digital Economy
Via E. Fermi, 2749 - TP 262
21027 Ispra VA, Italy

https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/

----
The views expressed are purely those of the writer and may
not in any circumstances be regarded as stating an official
position of the European Commission.

From: Faniel,Ixchel [mailto:fanielI@oclc.org]
Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 11:35 PM
To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org<mailto:public-dxwg-wg@w3.org>
Subject: W3C dxwg Use Cases

Hi all,

I'm Ixchel Faniel, one of the co-editors of the Use Case document.

As a reminder from our last two meetings about the use cases, the Use Case Editors would like you to re-examine the use cases you wrote to:


  1.  Ensure that the use cases are following the template the dxwg agreed to follow.  The template is included in the Use Case Working Space.
  2.  Pay special attention to the problem statement and be sure to include the stakeholders (i.e. who/what are experiencing the problem you have described).  If you have used the term "user" to describe the stakeholders as part of your written descriptions, please clarify and be as specific as possible - e.g. data producer, data consumer, data publisher, program, etc.

With these changes, it is our hope that all dxwg members will have a clearer understanding of your proposed use cases and be ready to engage in discussion.

In the coming days, I will be sending action items via Tracker to all use case authors to take another look at their use cases in preparation for our weekly meetings.

Any questions/concerns, let us know.

Thanks
ixchel



--

Ixchel M. Faniel

OCLC * Research Scientist, OCLC Research

6565 Kilgour Place, Dublin, Ohio USA 43017

T +1-614-764-4370 * F +1-614-718-7660

[Image removed by sender. OCLC]<http://www.oclc.org/home.en.html?cmpid=emailsig_logo>

OCLC.org<http://www.oclc.org/home.en.html?cmpid=emailsig_link> * Blog<http://www.oclc.org/blog/main/?cmpid=emailsig_blog> * Facebook<http://www.facebook.com/pages/OCLC/20530435726> * Twitter<http://twitter.com/oclc> * YouTube<http://www.youtube.com/OCLCvideo>