- From: Makx Dekkers <mail@makxdekkers.com>
- Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2019 12:52:07 +0100
- To: "'public-dxwg-comments'" <public-dxwg-comments@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <000001d4ce92$de92b290$9bb817b0$@makxdekkers.com>
I think the definition should not indicate use, that's for the usage note. I would suggest: Definition: "An alternative identifier for the Profile" Usage Note: "To be used when the Profile's URI cannot be used, for example in APIs or in content negotiation." Makx. From: Car, Nicholas (L&W, Dutton Park) <Nicholas.Car@csiro.au> Sent: 26 February 2019 22:15 To: public-dxwg-comments <public-dxwg-comments@w3.org> Subject: Feedback on the Profiles Vocabulary - Definition and note of prof:hasToken From Heidi Vanparys via GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/723 regarding the Profiles Vocabulary: The definition and note should be updated as they start with "A property..." and "This property is ...". A definition and note should define and describe the concept the property represents, not saying that "Property X represents concept X". See e.g. guideline 4 in [Guidelines for writing definitions in ontologies](https://philarchive.org/archive/SEPGFWv1) E.g. definition: profile identifier for use in APIs note: Should be used when the Profile's URI cannot be used. For potential use in content negotiation. Nicholas Car Senior Experimental Scientist CSIRO Land & Water 41 Boggo Road, Dutton Park, QLD 4102, Australia E nicholas.car@csiro.au <mailto:nicholas.car@csiro.au> M 0477 560 177 P 07 3833 5632
Received on Wednesday, 27 February 2019 11:52:36 UTC