- From: Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2016 15:54:44 +0000
- To: public-dwbp-wg@w3.org
I've just added MusicBrainz to the spreadsheet. It's pretty good in that it passes a lot of the BPs but there's no machine readable metadata. But then that's not what they're trying to do so it's not a bad thing in that sense. There's a Linked Data version but the documentation for it shows that it's rather old and out of date so I don't think it would help to add that to the implementation report. Phil. On 24/11/2016 14:32, Caroline Burle wrote: > Dear all, > > we elaborated the first draft Implementation Report [1], as we agreed on > our last meeting, explaining the Methodology we used to collect evidence > as well as listing the organizations from which we collected them. > > We kindly ask you to take a look if possible before our call tomorrow > and if you have any suggestions, please let us know as soon as you can. > > We’re still improving the implementation report, adjusting table, fixing > javascript and css bugs. However, you may already check the structure > and most important, the methodology. > > Thank you! Kind regards, > BP Editors > > [1] http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/dwbp-implementation-report.html > -- Phil Archer Data Strategist, W3C http://www.w3.org/ http://philarcher.org +44 (0)7887 767755 @philarcher1
Received on Thursday, 24 November 2016 15:54:57 UTC