W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dwbp-wg@w3.org > May 2016

Re: Implementation grid

From: Ghislain Atemezing <auguste.atemezing@eurecom.fr>
Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 14:54:07 +0200
Cc: "public-dwbp-wg@w3.org" <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <C66F6B02-2DDB-414D-B5C2-8A9A83AFE7BF@eurecom.fr>
To: Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>
Hi Phil, all 
> Le 26 mai 2016 à 23:29, Phil Archer <phila@w3.org> a écrit :
> We can't expect everyone to fill in a grid. I can create a questionnaire but to keep the barriers as low as possible, and to be practical, we're going to need to accept and interpret emails. So *we* might be the people filling in the grids.

I will do a small exercise with the SO catalog at http://data.southampton.ac.uk/ <http://data.southampton.ac.uk/> 
> I've created a template on the wiki at [1]. The idea is that we can copy and paste that into multiple pages and record implementations and linbk to those from a master grid like the one at https://www.w3.org/2006/06/mwbp-implementation-report <https://www.w3.org/2006/06/mwbp-implementation-report>.

+1 to the idea of reusing the grid, although I do not see the difference between “N/A” and “Not answered” flags.
Do we only record the implementations with the ratio (nbPassed/nbBPRelevant) > 0.5 ?


Ghislain A. Atemezing, Ph.D
Mail: ghislain.atemezing@gmail.com
Web: https://w3id.org/people/gatemezing <http://www.atemezing.org/>
Twitter: @gatemezing
About Me: https://about.me/ghislain.atemezing <https://about.me/ghislain.atemezing>

Received on Friday, 27 May 2016 12:54:37 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:39:52 UTC