- From: Bernadette Farias Lóscio <bfl@cin.ufpe.br>
- Date: Tue, 3 May 2016 14:54:56 -0300
- To: Annette Greiner <amgreiner@lbl.gov>
- Cc: "public-dwbp-wg@w3.org" <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CANx1PzxvNC1Z8MWXt-WZRCNb0fn+tDsLKbxhgfofUbu7wivWLg@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Annette, Thanks again! It reads much better :) Cheers! Berna 2016-05-03 14:44 GMT-03:00 Annette Greiner <amgreiner@lbl.gov>: > Oops, I must have been looking at dates with my eyes crossed. I was seeing > 2016 as 2015. > Re the feedback BP, how about this? > "Consumers will be able to assess the kinds of errors that affect the > dataset, review other users' experiences with it, and be reassured that the > publisher is actively addressing issues as needed. Consumers will also be > able to determine whether other users have already provided similar > feedback, saving them the trouble of submitting unnecessary bug reports and > sparing the maintainers from having to deal with duplicates." > -Annette > > > On 5/3/16 4:51 AM, Bernadette Farias Lóscio wrote: > > Hi Annette, > > thanks again for your valuable comments and suggestions! I updated the doc > and the corresponding commits are: BP Up to date [1] and BP feedback > available [2]. > > I agree with most of your suggestions and I just have two comments: > > The first one is about the example of the Up to Date BP: > >> >> Example >> I like the example, but there is some new text that is problematic. " The >> issue date (dct:issued) of the dataset can be used as the basis for the >> creation of new versions." I don't know what you mean to say with that. If >> you are making a new version, the original version will of course be used >> as the basis of the new one, but that has little to do with the issue date >> or with making sure the update frequency is adequate. "It is important to >> note that new versions can be created when necessary, however the publisher >> must ensure that the dataset will be updated according to the predefined >> update frequency." This is another example of the confusion between >> updating the available data and updating the web publication. In the >> example RDF, the date for the previous version is later than the date for >> the new version. >> > > I don't understand this part of your comment "This is another example of > the confusion between updating the available data and updating the web > publication. In the example RDF, the date for the previous version is later > than the date for the new version." > > The issue date of the new version (bus-stops-2016-05-05) is 2016-05-05 > while the issue date of the previous version (bus-stops-2015-12-17) > is 2015-12-17. > > > The other comment is about the Intended Outcome of the Feedback BP: > > "Consumers will be able to assess the kinds of errors that affect the >> dataset and be reassured that the publisher is actively addressing issues >> as needed. Consumers will also be able to determine whether other users >> have already provided similar feedback, saving them the trouble of >> submitting unnecessary bug reports and sparing the maintainers from having >> to deal with duplicates." >> > > I like this, but I think we should mention something related to the > consumer's opinion/rating about a dataset. I think that feedback is also > important to tell others that it is worth using the dataset rather than > just to report errors. Does it make sense for you? > > What do you about this? > > "Consumers will be able to assess the kinds of errors that affect the > dataset as well as consumers ratings and opinions, and be reassured that > the publisher is actively addressing issues as needed." > > > cheers, > Berna > > [1] > https://github.com/w3c/dwbp/commit/88256c8a815b1c677096bbdf2e76faecebe23b67 > [2] > https://github.com/w3c/dwbp/commit/729fa706ac4bf5d3165121a1032798de19f671dd > > > > > -- > Bernadette Farias Lóscio > Centro de Informática > Universidade Federal de Pernambuco - UFPE, Brazil > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > -- > Annette Greiner > NERSC Data and Analytics Services > Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory > > > -- Bernadette Farias Lóscio Centro de Informática Universidade Federal de Pernambuco - UFPE, Brazil ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Tuesday, 3 May 2016 17:55:45 UTC