public-dwbp-wg@w3.org from March 2016 by date

Thursday, 31 March 2016

• Feedback about examples Bernadette Farias Lóscio
• Re: old issues we've been ignoring Bernadette Farias Lóscio
• dwbp-ISSUE-251: [Best practices document(s)] Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: Data reuse split into 3 - review Laufer
• Re: Data reuse split into 3 - review Annette Greiner
• Data reuse split into 3 - review Laufer
• International Open Data Conference in Madrid - DWBP Proposal Deirdre Lee
• Re: Data Identification BPs Bernadette Farias Lóscio
• Agenda for tomorrow's meeting Deirdre Lee

Wednesday, 30 March 2016

• Re: Example of BP Provide bulk download Eric Stephan
• Re: Example of BP Provide bulk download Annette Greiner
• Re: Example of BP Provide bulk download Eric Stephan
• Re: DQV provenance example and RDF vocabulary to specify software description Eric Stephan
• Re: Update BP Use persistent URIs as identifiers of datasets Caroline Burle
• Data Identification BPs Phil Archer
• Re: DWBP - Last Call before CR Annette Greiner
• [DWBP] Intended Outcomes and Tests Ig Ibert Bittencourt
• DWBP - Last Call before CR Deirdre Lee
• Re: DQV provenance example and RDF vocabulary to specify software description Riccardo Albertoni
• Re: Update BP Use persistent URIs as identifiers of datasets Phil Archer
• Re: [dwbp] Changes on Data Reuse section Hadley Beeman

Tuesday, 29 March 2016

• Re: Example of BP Provide bulk download Annette Greiner
• Update BP Use persistent URIs as identifiers of datasets Caroline Burle
• Example of BP Provide real-time access Caroline Burle
• Example of BP Provide bulk download Caroline Burle
• Re: DQV provenance example and RDF vocabulary to specify software description Eric Stephan
• DQV provenance example and RDF vocabulary to specify software description Riccardo Albertoni
• Meeting time this week Phil Archer
• Re: dwbp-ACTION-271: create a dimension for precision in the DQV namespace Riccardo Albertoni

Monday, 28 March 2016

• [dwbp] Changes on Data Reuse section Newton Calegari

Friday, 25 March 2016

• Re: Provide Access to Subsets - 2 real examples Annette Greiner
• Re: Provide Access to Subsets - 2 real examples Laufer
• Re: Provide Access to Subsets - 2 real examples Annette Greiner
• Fwd: New dqv:inDimension Riccardo Albertoni
• Fwd: New dqv:inDimension Riccardo Albertoni
• Re: dwbp-ACTION-271: create a dimension for precision in the DQV namespace Riccardo Albertoni
• Provide Access to Subsets - 2 real examples Laufer

Thursday, 24 March 2016

• issue-219 Removing Section 9 in DUV Eric Stephan
• old issues we've been ignoring Annette Greiner
• Re: Fwd: Comments on Tracker Annette Greiner
• Re: dwbp-ACTION-260: to ensure text makes clear that dimensions anad categories are defined as subclasses of skos:concept Riccardo Albertoni
• Re: Subsetting BP Bernadette Farias Lóscio
• Re: Subsetting BP Eric Stephan

Wednesday, 23 March 2016

• Re: Subsetting BP Annette Greiner
• Re: Subsetting BP Eric Stephan
• Re: Subsetting BP Phil Archer
• Re: Subsetting BP Eric Stephan
• Subsetting BP Phil Archer
• Re: Fwd: International Open Data Conference in Madrid - Proposals Martin Alvarez-Espinar
• Today's call is NOW Hadley Beeman
• action-252 data usage vocabulary timetable Eric Stephan
• Re: dwbp-ACTION-251: Work with ericstephan on creating examples of dataset usage counts in the dqv Eric Stephan
• Re: dwbp-ACTION-251: Work with ericstephan on creating examples of dataset usage counts in the dqv Riccardo Albertoni
• Re: Review of BP on data re-use Bernadette Farias Lóscio
• Re: Fwd: International Open Data Conference in Madrid - Proposals Caroline Burle
• Re: Today's Timing Caroline Burle
• Re: Review of BP Enable Data Subsetting Bernadette Farias Lóscio
• Re: Review of BP Enable Data Subsetting Eric Stephan
• Re: dwbp-ACTION-251: Work with ericstephan on creating examples of dataset usage counts in the dqv Eric Stephan
• Re: Review of BP Enable Data Subsetting Deirdre Lee
• Re: Review of BP on data re-use Deirdre Lee
• Re: Data usage vocabulary examples updated Eric Stephan
• Re: dwbp-ACTION-255: Create an example using prov:wasderivedfrom in the dqv, close issue-222 Riccardo Albertoni
• Today's Timing Phil Archer
• Re: dwbp-ACTION-255: Create an example using prov:wasderivedfrom in the dqv, close issue-222 Antoine Isaac
• Data usage vocabulary examples updated Eric Stephan
• Re: Suggestions for ACTION-227: Work with eric s on writing section on evolution of duv wrt reuse of namespaces etc. Eric Stephan
• Review of BP Enable Data Subsetting Laufer

Tuesday, 22 March 2016

• Re: Review of BP on data re-use Annette Greiner
• Re: New dqv:inDimension Antoine Isaac
• Re: dwbp-ACTION-259: Add examples showing user feedback for questioning and classification. Riccardo Albertoni
• Re: dwbp-ACTION-256: Add a note saying that new motivations can be defined but that this should be done following the open annotation guidelines Riccardo Albertoni
• Re: Review of BP on data re-use Laufer
• Re: Review of BP on data re-use Bernadette Farias Lóscio
• Re: dwbp-ACTION-255: Create an example using prov:wasderivedfrom in the dqv, close issue-222 Riccardo Albertoni
• Re: Agenda for the rescheduled call TOMORROW yaso
• Agenda for the rescheduled call TOMORROW Hadley Beeman
• Re: New dqv:inDimension Debattista, Jeremy
• Fwd: International Open Data Conference in Madrid - Proposals Martin Alvarez-Espinar
• Re: dwbp-ACTION-253: Add proposed text above in the minutes on 2016-03-14 and close issue 181 Riccardo Albertoni
• Re: Suggestions for ACTION-227: Work with eric s on writing section on evolution of duv wrt reuse of namespaces etc. Eric Stephan
• Re: dwbp-ACTION-253: Add proposed text above in the minutes on 2016-03-14 and close issue 181 Antoine Isaac
• Re: Suggestions for ACTION-227: Work with eric s on writing section on evolution of duv wrt reuse of namespaces etc. Antoine Isaac

Saturday, 19 March 2016

• Re: dwbp-ACTION-253: Add proposed text above in the minutes on 2016-03-14 and close issue 181 Riccardo Albertoni

Friday, 18 March 2016

• Re: New dqv:inDimension Riccardo Albertoni
• Re: New dqv:inDimension Debattista, Jeremy
• Re: New dqv:inDimension Riccardo Albertoni

Thursday, 17 March 2016

• Re: New dqv:inDimension Debattista, Jeremy
• New dqv:inDimension Riccardo Albertoni
• Re: Suggestions for ACTION-227: Work with eric s on writing section on evolution of duv wrt reuse of namespaces etc. Ghislain Atemezing
• Suggestions for ACTION-227: Work with eric s on writing section on evolution of duv wrt reuse of namespaces etc. Antoine Isaac
• Re: dwbp-ACTION-271: create a dimension for precision in the DQV namespace Annette Greiner

Wednesday, 16 March 2016

• Re: dwbp-ACTION-271: create a dimension for precision in the DQV namespace Antoine Isaac
• Re: dwbp-ACTION-271: create a dimension for precision in the DQV namespace Annette Greiner
• Re: Parameters for metrics - Issue-223 Debattista, Jeremy
• dwbp-ACTION-271: create a dimension for precision in the DQV namespace Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• Wish list Caroline Burle
• Review of BP on data re-use Antoine Isaac
• dwbp-ACTION-270: Validate html and accessibility rules of dwbp-example.html Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• Helping with reviews Caroline Burle
• Re: some comments on the DWBP draft Caroline Burle

Tuesday, 15 March 2016

• Re: dwbp-ISSUE-250: Should we create a new section to include the namespaces that are being used in the examples? [Best practices document(s)] Annette Greiner
• Re: dwbp-ACTION-254: Turn the text of issue 11 into a note in the doc Antoine Isaac
• Re: dwbp-ISSUE-250: Should we create a new section to include the namespaces that are being used in the examples? [Best practices document(s)] Bernadette Farias Lóscio
• dwbp-ACTION-269: Top creatre wiki page to collect a wish list for a future wg Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• dwbp-ACTION-268: Add intro to daq in the dqv Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: Updates examples for BP Choose the right formalization level Newton Calegari
• dwbp-ACTION-267: Attempt to merge the bps on api documetnation Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• dwbp-ACTION-266: Include namespace table at top Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: Parameters for metrics - Issue-223 Antoine Isaac
• dwbp-ACTION-265: Add line on frag identifiers in best practice 15: provide data in multiple formats Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• Meeting Dates w/c 21 and 28 March Phil Archer
• Regrets for tomorrow... Eric Stephan
• DUV updates... Eric Stephan

Monday, 14 March 2016

• Re: updates to BP doc Antoine Isaac
• Updates examples for BP Choose the right formalization level Antoine Isaac
• Re: dwbp-ISSUE-248 (feedback-reuse): To change the Feedback section to Data Reuse section. [Best practices document(s)] Annette Greiner
• Re: Action-148 Antoine Isaac
• Re: dwbp-ISSUE-250: Should we create a new section to include the namespaces that are being used in the examples? [Best practices document(s)] Annette Greiner
• Re: updates to BP doc Annette Greiner
• Re: dwbp-ISSUE-250: Should we create a new section to include the namespaces that are being used in the examples? [Best practices document(s)] Eric Stephan
• dwbp-ISSUE-250: Should we create a new section to include the namespaces that are being used in the examples? [Best practices document(s)] Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: updates to BP doc Caroline Burle
• Re: Updates and suggestions to BP17 Reuse vocabularies Annette Greiner
• Re: Updates and suggestions to BP17 Reuse vocabularies Bernadette Farias Lóscio
• dwbp-ACTION-264: Ensure that the bp doc refers to the example for representing precision and accuracy in the dqv Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• Action-148 yaso
• dwbp-ISSUE-249 (fragment identifiers): Discussion about fragment identifiers [Best practices document(s)] Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• dwbp-ACTION-263: Assess compatibility of dqv with data cube by 2016-04-15 Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• dwbp-ACTION-262: Turn an existing paragraph on representing conformance and non-conformance into the note pointing to geodcat-ap Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• Comments on Tracker Caroline Burle
• dwbp-ACTION-261: Add a note to the effect of the decision about using shacl rather than abstract and sub classes. Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: addressing old comments from Erik W Caroline Burle
• Re: comments regarding versioning Caroline Burle
• dwbp-ACTION-260: to ensure text makes clear that dimensions anad categories are defined as subclasses of skos:concept Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• dwbp-ACTION-259: Add examples showing user feedback for questioning and classification. Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• dwbp-ACTION-258: Remove the domain from dqv:indimension, move it from section measurement and add it in the dqv diagram and send a email to jeremy. with the new definition of dqv:indimension, where dqv:indimension is a super-property of the inverse of daq:hasmetric Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• dwbp-ACTION-257: Add a table describing the resource dqv:qualutyassessment Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• dwbp-ACTION-256: Add a note saying that new motivations can be defined but that this should be done following the open annotation guidelines Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• close dwbp-ACTION-250: Update the config on respec with the public mailing address and answer comment lc-3062 (https://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/68239/wd-dwbp-20150625/3062) Newton Calegari
• dwbp-ACTION-255: Create an example using prov:wasderivedfrom in the dqv, close issue-222 Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: comments regarding versioning Newton Calegari
• dwbp-ACTION-254: Turn the text of issue 11 into a note in the doc Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• dwbp-ACTION-253: Add proposed text above in the minutes on 2016-03-14 and close issue 181 Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• dwbp-ACTION-252: Create time table for duv progress/iterations Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: comments regarding versioning Caroline Burle
• dwbp-ACTION-251: Work with ericstephan on creating examples of dataset usage counts in the dqv Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• dwbp-ACTION-250: Update the config on respec with the public mailing address and answer comment lc-3062 (https://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/68239/wd-dwbp-20150625/3062) Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• dwbp-ACTION-249: Answer comment 3051 from eric wilde (https://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/68239/wd-dwbp-20150224/3051) Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: ISSUE-240: To consider a new bp around numeric accuracy. comes from sdw's concern about useless extra decmimal places Newton Calegari
• dwbp-ACTION-248: Write a bp around accuracy and precision, the pitfalls of false accuracy etc. Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• dwbp-ACTION-247: Fill in the blanks in table at http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/bp.html#requirements Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• Links between (vocabulary and quality) requirements and BPs Antoine Isaac
• dwbp-ISSUE-248 (feedback-reuse): To change the Feedback section to Data Reuse section. [Best practices document(s)] Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• dwbp-ACTION-246: Rewrite bp11, in particular the way the external refs are included Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• dwbp-ACTION-245: Update bp 11 table to link to the pdf and the gh update. Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• dwbp-ACTION-244: Remove the 2nd line of test section and rewrite the intended outcome of the bp2 provide descriptive metadata Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: Open Issues to be closed during the F2F Zagreb Ghislain Atemezing
• New DQV example for Quality Policy Antoine Isaac
• dwbp-ACTION-243: Arrange redseign of the challenges diagram Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: Open Issues to be closed during the F2F Zagreb Annette Greiner

Sunday, 13 March 2016

• Re: ISSUE-220: Should we include a more complexe example to illustrate provenance? Antoine Isaac
• Open Issues to be closed during the F2F Zagreb Caroline Burle
• Re: Updates and suggestions to BP17 Reuse vocabularies Antoine Isaac
• Re: dwbp-ISSUE-230: Should we consider other BP benefits? [Best practices document(s)] Bernadette Farias Lóscio
• Re: dwbp-ISSUE-226: Should we remove the Reuse benefit? [Best practices document(s)] Annette Greiner
• Re: dwbp-ISSUE-230: Should we consider other BP benefits? [Best practices document(s)] Deirdre Lee
• Re: dwbp-ISSUE-226: Should we remove the Reuse benefit? [Best practices document(s)] Deirdre Lee
• Re: Correspond Example number to BP number Annette Greiner
• Correspond Example number to BP number Deirdre Lee
• Re: ISSUE-220: Should we include a more complexe example to illustrate provenance? Deirdre Lee
• Re: Updates and suggestions to BP17 Reuse vocabularies Annette Greiner
• Re: dwbp-ISSUE-244: Replacing sections Data on the Web Challenges and BP Benefits [Best practices document(s)] Annette Greiner
• Re: Updates and suggestions to BP17 Reuse vocabularies Antoine Isaac
• ISSUE-167 Re: Language properties - eating one's own dog food Deirdre Lee
• Re: dwbp-ISSUE-247 (dataset-discovery): How to test dataset discoverability? [Best practices document(s)] Deirdre Lee
• dwbp-ISSUE-247 (dataset-discovery): How to test dataset discoverability? [Best practices document(s)] Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• Help with issues 245 and Caroline Burle
• dwbp-ISSUE-246: Find an alternative to make the Challenges' diagram bigger [Best practices document(s)] Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• dwbp-ISSUE-245 (summary-filter): To include filters in the summary to sort BPs according to Benefits or Challenges [Best practices document(s)] Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: dwbp-ISSUE-244: Replacing sections Data on the Web Challenges and BP Benefits [Best practices document(s)] Bernadette Farias Lóscio
• Re: updates to BP doc Phil Archer
• updates to BP doc Annette Greiner

Saturday, 12 March 2016

• Re: Updates and suggestions to BP17 Reuse vocabularies Antoine Isaac

Friday, 11 March 2016

• Re: dwbp-ISSUE-244: Replacing sections Data on the Web Challenges and BP Benefits [Best practices document(s)] Annette Greiner
• Re: Updates and suggestions to BP17 Reuse vocabularies Annette Greiner
• Re: BP #30 https://www.w3.org/TR/dwbp/#GatherFeedback Newton Calegari
• BP #30 https://www.w3.org/TR/dwbp/#GatherFeedback Eric Stephan
• [Minutes] 2016-03-11 Phil Archer
• dwbp-ACTION-242: Follow up on issue 220 Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• dwbp-ACTION-241: Review bp 22 Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• dwbp-ACTION-240: Work on the bp for enriching data before the f2f Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: Updates and suggestions to BP17 Reuse vocabularies Antoine Isaac
• Re: ISSUE-220: Should we include a more complexe example to illustrate provenance? Antoine Isaac
• dwbp-ACTION-239: Check on using an example about real-time data for bp23 Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• Remaining work on DUV Eric Stephan
• Re: Updates and suggestions to BP17 Reuse vocabularies Bernadette Farias Lóscio
• Re: dwbp-ISSUE-244: Replacing sections Data on the Web Challenges and BP Benefits [Best practices document(s)] Annette Greiner
• DWBP Open issues Bernadette Farias Lóscio
• ISSUE-239: machine-readable standardized data formats - serialization data formats - dataset formats Bernadette Farias Lóscio
• ISSUE-242: APIs on the Web (for publishing Data on the Web) Best Practices Bernadette Farias Lóscio
• ISSUE-232: Sort out what is a CSV and what is a JSON file in the example Bernadette Farias Lóscio
• ISSUE-228: Should we include definitions on the glossary to explain other terms used in the Context section? Bernadette Farias Lóscio
• ISSUE-220: Should we include a more complexe example to illustrate provenance? Bernadette Farias Lóscio
• Re: dwbp-ISSUE-244: Replacing sections Data on the Web Challenges and BP Benefits [Best practices document(s)] Bernadette Farias Lóscio

Thursday, 10 March 2016

• Re: ISSUE-94: Dataset versioning and dataset replication Annette Greiner
• Re: Relation between dqv:qualityAssessment and Web Annotation motivations Riccardo Albertoni
• Re: dwbp-ISSUE-244: Replacing sections Data on the Web Challenges and BP Benefits [Best practices document(s)] Annette Greiner
• Re: dwbp-ISSUE-235: Namespaces in DUV [Data Usage Vocabulary] Eric Stephan
• ISSUE-148: Can we use the five star rating system as a BP document metric to describe Open Data instead of a path to LD? Bernadette Farias Lóscio
• ISSUE-94: Dataset versioning and dataset replication Bernadette Farias Lóscio
• dwbp-ISSUE-244: Replacing sections Data on the Web Challenges and BP Benefits [Best practices document(s)] Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: Agenda for tomorrow… Laufer
• Re: Agenda for tomorrow… Caroline Burle
• Re: Zagreb F2F Remote participation Eric Stephan
• Agenda for tomorrow… Hadley Beeman
• Re: Relation between dqv:qualityAssessment and Web Annotation motivations Antoine Isaac

Wednesday, 9 March 2016

• Re: DQV, ISO 19115/19157 and GeoDCAT-AP - Issue-202 - representing conformance Antoine Isaac
• Re: Parameters for metrics - Issue-223 Antoine Isaac
• Re: Comments / Actions / Issues Antoine Isaac
• Zagreb F2F Remote participation Phil Archer
• Re: Comments / Actions / Issues Phil Archer
• Re: Comments / Actions / Issues Deirdre Lee
• Re: Comments / Actions / Issues Antoine Isaac
• Comments / Actions / Issues Deirdre Lee
• Re: [DWBP] Status of comments on Comment Tracker - for all doc editors Deirdre Lee

Tuesday, 8 March 2016

• Re: addressing old comments from Erik W Annette Greiner
• Re: [DWBP] Status of comments on Comment Tracker Caroline Burle
• Re: addressing old comments from Erik W Caroline Burle
• Re: Parameters for metrics - Issue-223 Riccardo Albertoni
• BPs on data and metadata (was: metadata on metadata quality) Antoine Isaac
• Re: DQV, ISO 19115/19157 and GeoDCAT-AP Antoine Isaac
• Re: DQV, ISO 19115/19157 and GeoDCAT-AP - metadata on metadata quality Andrea Perego
• Re: dwbp-ACTION-219: Send an email to discuss the suggestion to add the assertion that a dataset's metadata conforms to a standard (like geojson) Riccardo Albertoni
• Re: DQV, ISO 19115/19157 and GeoDCAT-AP - representing conformance levels Andrea Perego
• Re: DQV, ISO 19115/19157 and GeoDCAT-AP Andrea Perego
• Re: DQV, ISO 19115/19157 and GeoDCAT-AP - representing conformance levels Antoine Isaac
• Re: DQV, ISO 19115/19157 and GeoDCAT-AP Antoine Isaac

Monday, 7 March 2016

• Re: DQV, ISO 19115/19157 and GeoDCAT-AP Andrea Perego
• Re: DQV, ISO 19115/19157 and GeoDCAT-AP - metadata on metadata quality Antoine Isaac
• Re: DQV, ISO 19115/19157 and GeoDCAT-AP Antoine Isaac
• dwbp-ISSUE-243: Representing precision and accuracy [Quality & Granularity Vocabulary] Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker

Sunday, 6 March 2016

• Parameters for metrics - Issue-223 Antoine Isaac
• Re: some thoughts on https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/222 Antoine Isaac

Friday, 4 March 2016

• Re: New BP (?) - Using standards for distributing datasets for specific domains or applications Annette Greiner
• Re: New BP (?) - Using standards for distributing datasets for specific domains or applications Antoine Isaac
• Re: New BP (?) - Using standards for distributing datasets for specific domains or applications Annette Greiner
• Re: New BP (?) - Using standards for distributing datasets for specific domains or applications Laufer
• data "enrichment" Annette Greiner
• Re: New BP (?) - Using standards for distributing datasets for specific domains or applications Antoine Isaac
• [Minutes] 2016-03-04 Phil Archer
• New BP (?) - Using standards for distributing datasets for specific domains or applications Laufer
• [Minutes] 2016-02-26 Phil Archer
• dwbp-ACTION-238: Include rdfa to the human-readable example of strucutral metadata (dwbp-example.html) Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: Can we align the quality dimension hints in DQV with the ones in ISO 25012? (issue 200) Nandana Mihindukulasooriya

Thursday, 3 March 2016

• Updates and suggestions to BP17 Reuse vocabularies Antoine Isaac
• addressing old comments from Erik W Annette Greiner
• Re: Relation between dqv:qualityAssessment and Web Annotation motivations Riccardo Albertoni
• Fwd: Can we align the quality dimension hints in DQV with the ones in ISO 25012? (issue 200) Riccardo Albertoni
• Agenda for tomorrow - countdown to Zagreb Deirdre Lee
• Re: Language properties - eating one's own dog food Antoine Isaac
• Re: Questions about provenance BP 6 Antoine Isaac

Wednesday, 2 March 2016

• [Minutes] 2016-03-02 Phil Archer
• Machine Readable Example 2 Phil Archer
• Re: Language properties - eating one's own dog food Newton Calegari

Tuesday, 1 March 2016

• Re: Questions about provenance BP 6 Bernadette Farias Lóscio
• Re: Spatial Data on the Web meeting this week Bernadette Farias Lóscio
• Fwd: Spatial Data on the Web meeting this week Phil Archer
• Fwd: Spatial Data on the Web meeting this week Phil Archer
• Re: content negotiation in BP doc Annette Greiner

Last message date: Thursday, 31 March 2016 23:11:09 UTC