Re: Post-mortem comment on ISSUE-179 - using DCAT namespace or not

+ 1! I also agree with Eric!

cheers,
Berna

2016-01-25 21:43 GMT+01:00 Eric Stephan <ericphb@gmail.com>:

> +1 sounds appropriate to me.   If the wg chairs feel that need a vote, I
> propose we do this via email.
>
> Eric S
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Jan 25, 2016, at 5:18 AM, Riccardo Albertoni <albertoni@ge.imati.cnr.it>
> wrote:
>
> Dear All,
>
> It seems to me that we have already taken a decision on that, a decision
> on which I fully agree ..   so
>
> +1 to have  namespaces separated from DCAT and to delete the related note
> on dqv document.
>
> Cheers,
> Riccardo
>
> On 22 January 2016 at 23:15, Eric Stephan <ericphb@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> To establish a bit of a timeline, last October there was a very small
>> contingency of folks including Antoine and myself on the October 16 WG
>> call.  I don't believe it was a formal meeting that day and there wasn't a
>> vote, but here [1] is the last discussion we had about not using DCAT as a
>> namespace, from what I can tell.
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Eric S
>>
>> Reference
>> [1]
>> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-dwbp-wg/2015Oct/0035.html
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 8:56 AM, Phil Archer <phila@w3.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks Antoine,
>>>
>>> My understanding is that the WG resolved not to use the DCAT namespace
>>> for either vocabulary. I'd have difficulty finding the resolution itself
>>> but that is my clear memory. The rationale being that people didn't like
>>> having terms in a single namespace being defined in multiple documents.
>>>
>>> If others have a different recollection, then of course I am ready to be
>>> corrected.
>>>
>>> Phil.
>>>
>>>
>>> On 22/01/2016 16:34, Antoine Isaac wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi everyone,
>>>>
>>>> We didn't really conclude on my questions today, so I'm going to write
>>>> it down in an email, also to share with everyone else.
>>>>
>>>> During the last F2F we discussed whether DQV and DUV should introduce
>>>> their elements in the DCAT namespace or their own. There was an issue,
>>>> 197, raised for it [1].
>>>> The resolution then was that "DUV begins to use the DCAT namespace, DQV
>>>> does not, but that both highlight this as an open issue that will lead
>>>> to a common way forward in future." [2]
>>>>
>>>> Month after, DQV has a note about this:
>>>> [
>>>> The Working Group is considering putting all new classes and properties
>>>> defined in the DWBP Vocabularies in the DCAT namespace. As an attempt to
>>>> stimulate reactions which might help in taking a decision, the Dataset
>>>> Usage Vocabulary will be moved under the DCAT namespace. In case of
>>>> positive reactions to the DUV choice, the data quality vocabulary might
>>>> consider to go in the same direction.
>>>> ] [3]
>>>>
>>>> But DUV went its own way and created its own namespace.
>>>>
>>>> I believe that it's not a big problem. The discussion since then, and
>>>> the decision we made to publish DQV and DUV as notes (as opposed to
>>>> Recommendations) comfirms that we should have our own namespaces.
>>>>
>>>> Still I prefer to ask everyone if:
>>>> - it's ok that we remove the note about ISSUE-179 in DQV
>>>> - we record a new resolution for ISSUE-179.
>>>>
>>>> Any objection before I do this next week?
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>>
>>>> Antoine
>>>>
>>>> [1] https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/179
>>>> [2] http://www.w3.org/2013/meeting/dwbp/2015-09-25#resolution_8
>>>> [3] http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/vocab-dqg.html#namespaces
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>>
>>> Phil Archer
>>> W3C Data Activity Lead
>>> http://www.w3.org/2013/data/
>>>
>>> http://philarcher.org
>>> +44 (0)7887 767755
>>> @philarcher1
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by
>> *E.F.A. Project* <http://www.efa-project.org>, and is believed to be
>> clean.
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Riccardo Albertoni
> Istituto per la Matematica Applicata e Tecnologie Informatiche "Enrico
> Magenes"
> Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche
> via de Marini 6 - 16149 GENOVA - ITALIA
> tel. +39-010-6475624 - fax +39-010-6475660
> e-mail: Riccardo.Albertoni@ge.imati.cnr.it
> Skype: callto://riccardoalbertoni/
> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/riccardoalbertoni
> www: http://www.ge.imati.cnr.it/Albertoni
> http://purl.oclc.org/NET/riccardoAlbertoni
> FOAF:http://purl.oclc.org/NET/RiccardoAlbertoni/foaf
>
>


-- 
Bernadette Farias Lóscio
Centro de Informática
Universidade Federal de Pernambuco - UFPE, Brazil
----------------------------------------------------------------------------