public-dwbp-wg@w3.org from January 2016 by date

Friday, 29 January 2016

• Re: Zagreb F2F Phil Archer
• Re: Zagreb F2F Antoine Isaac
• Re: Problems removing hasDimension and hasMetric as abstract properties Debattista, Jeremy
• ISSUE 190 Riccardo Albertoni
• Re: Agenda for tomorrow Bernadette Farias Lóscio
• Re: Post-mortem comment on ISSUE-179 - using DCAT namespace or not Bernadette Farias Lóscio
• Re: Invitation to join a Spatial data WG call Bernadette Farias Lóscio

Thursday, 28 January 2016

• Re: Ordinary Working Draft Publication request Phil Archer
• Re: Agenda for tomorrow Eric Stephan
• Re: Problems removing hasDimension and hasMetric as abstract properties Riccardo Albertoni
• Agenda for tomorrow Hadley Beeman
• Re: Post-mortem comment on ISSUE-179 - using DCAT namespace or not Deirdre Lee

Wednesday, 27 January 2016

• Re: Problems removing hasDimension and hasMetric as abstract properties Antoine Isaac
• Invitation to join a Spatial data WG call Phil Archer
• Re: Ordinary Working Draft Publication request Eric Stephan
• Zagreb F2F (was Re: dwbp-ACTION-225: Put together an agenda for the share-psi/dwbp overlap in zagreb) Phil Archer
• dwbp-ACTION-225: Put together an agenda for the share-psi/dwbp overlap in zagreb Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: Ordinary Working Draft Publication request Phil Archer
• Ordinary Working Draft Publication request Phil Archer

Tuesday, 26 January 2016

• Re: Problems removing hasDimension and hasMetric as abstract properties Riccardo Albertoni
• Re: Post-mortem comment on ISSUE-179 - using DCAT namespace or not Laufer

Monday, 25 January 2016

• Re: Post-mortem comment on ISSUE-179 - using DCAT namespace or not Eric Stephan
• Re: Post-mortem comment on ISSUE-179 - using DCAT namespace or not Riccardo Albertoni

Friday, 22 January 2016

• Re: Post-mortem comment on ISSUE-179 - using DCAT namespace or not Eric Stephan
• Re: Post-mortem comment on ISSUE-179 - using DCAT namespace or not Phil Archer
• Post-mortem comment on ISSUE-179 - using DCAT namespace or not Antoine Isaac
• Fwd: comments on the DUV Joao Paulo Almeida

Thursday, 21 January 2016

• Agenda for tomorrow's meeting Deirdre Lee

Tuesday, 19 January 2016

• Re: Quick review of DUV Deirdre Lee
• Re: DUV Comments Laufer
• Quick review of DUV Phil Archer
• DUV Still to do.... Eric Stephan
• DUV Document Eric Stephan
• dwbp-ISSUE-238: Should some of our properties be sub properties of a parent property? [Data Usage Vocabulary] Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: DUV Comments Eric Stephan
• dwbp-ISSUE-237: Stability of http://vocab.org/review/terms.html#Feedback [Data Usage Vocabulary] Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• dwbp-ISSUE-236: agentClassification, usageClassification, skos:Concept [Data Usage Vocabulary] Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• dwbp-ISSUE-235: Namespaces in DUV [Data Usage Vocabulary] Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• dwbp-ISSUE-234: Role of Usage Tool [Data Usage Vocabulary] Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• More changes checked in for DUV Eric Stephan

Monday, 18 January 2016

• Re: Part 3 (was Re: Working through DUV parts 1 & 2) Eric Stephan
• Re: Part 3 (was Re: Working through DUV parts 1 & 2) Phil Archer
• Fwd: [Moderator Action] Re: Updates to the DUV model diagram... Phil Archer

Sunday, 17 January 2016

• Re: Updates to the DUV model diagram... Eric Stephan
• Re: Updates to the DUV model diagram... Eric Stephan

Saturday, 16 January 2016

• Re: comments on the DUV João Paulo Almeida
• Re: Updates to the DUV model diagram... João Paulo Almeida
• Updates to the DUV model diagram... Eric Stephan

Friday, 15 January 2016

• Re: comments on the DUV Eric Stephan
• DUV Comments Laufer
• [DWBP] Managing external comments Newton Calegari
• Re: comments on the DUV Phil Archer
• Re: Tomorrow's agenda Ig Ibert Bittencourt
• Re: Part 3 (was Re: Working through DUV parts 1 & 2) Phil Archer
• Re: Part 3 (was Re: Working through DUV parts 1 & 2) Eric Stephan
• Re: comments on the DUV Eric Stephan
• Part 3 (was Re: Working through DUV parts 1 & 2) Phil Archer
• Re: Tomorrow's agenda Bernadette Farias Lóscio
• comments on the DUV João Paulo Almeida
• Re: Part 2 (was Re: Working through DUV part 1) Eric Stephan
• Re: Working through DUV part 1 Eric Stephan
• Re: vann:hasUsageNote... Antoine Isaac

Thursday, 14 January 2016

• Part 2 (was Re: Working through DUV part 1) Phil Archer
• Working through DUV part 1 Phil Archer
• Tomorrow's agenda Deirdre Lee

Tuesday, 12 January 2016

• vann:hasUsageNote... Eric Stephan
• BP doc updated Phil Archer

Monday, 11 January 2016

• Re: F2F Dates confirmed Phil Archer
• Re: F2F Dates confirmed Eric Stephan
• F2F Dates confirmed Phil Archer
• Re: Publication Request, 1 ordinary WD Phil Archer
• Re: Publication Request, 1 ordinary WD Phil Archer
• Re: DQV, ISO 19115/19157 and GeoDCAT-AP Andrea Perego

Sunday, 10 January 2016

• Publication Request, 1 ordinary WD Phil Archer

Thursday, 7 January 2016

• Re: a couple of concerns Annette Greiner
• Agenda for tomorrow Hadley Beeman

Wednesday, 6 January 2016

• Re: a couple of concerns Phil Archer
• dwbp-ISSUE-233 (Rest APIs): Amendments to BP: Use Web Standardized Interfaces [Best practices document(s)] Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: a couple of concerns Hadley Beeman

Monday, 4 January 2016

• Re: Potential DQV prov:entity/activity example Eric Stephan
• Potential DQV prov:entity/activity example Deirdre Lee

Last message date: Friday, 29 January 2016 16:21:54 UTC