W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dwbp-wg@w3.org > September 2015

dwbp-ISSUE-200: Can we align the quality dimension hints in DQV with the ones in ISO 25012? [Quality & Granularity Vocabulary]

From: Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2015 15:52:09 +0000
To: public-dwbp-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1ZfVI9-000EPT-5R@deneb.w3.org>
dwbp-ISSUE-200: Can we align the quality dimension hints in DQV with the ones in  ISO 25012? [Quality & Granularity Vocabulary]

http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/200

Raised by: Nandana Mihindukulasooriya
On product: Quality & Granularity Vocabulary

When looking at the quality dimension hints in DQV and ISO 25012 (SQuaRE - Data quality model), there is a big overlap. I did an initial comparison and all except for relevance and statistics fit in. 

Comparison of DQV and ISO 25012 dimensions  
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1VMe--lhbiRGvQW1eWsYhUW2TeUBVxR3hzNskIPtSZoM/edit#gid=0

ISO 25012 provides definitions for each dimension developed by the TC. It will good to refer to them whenever possible and define new ones only when it's necessary. 

Some terms have to be unified such as 
1. Currentness, Timeliness
2. Compliance, Conformance
Received on Friday, 25 September 2015 15:52:10 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:39:41 UTC