Re: GeoDCAT-AP: Call for public review

Hi, Antoine.

> [snip]
>
> That's probably the core of the problem: I can understand the distinction
> between the two levels (license for use and access rights) but the data that
> you get in the ISO field (with the mixture of free text and URL) would only
> fit the semantics of the less specific dc:rights. Unless you expunge the
> free text and just keep the URL, which then fits the use of dcterms:license.

Just to check if I understood your point:

Do you mean that dct:license can be used only with a URI pointing to
the licence itself, and if we have just text we must use dc:rights?

Or rather it is the wording of the text ("Reuse is athorised etc.")
that does not fit the specific notion of "licence"?

Thanks!

Andrea