- From: Andrea Perego <andrea.perego@jrc.ec.europa.eu>
- Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2015 07:18:53 +0200
- To: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
- Cc: GeoDCAT-AP WG <dcat_application_profile-geo@joinup.ec.europa.eu>, "public-dwbp-wg@w3.org" <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>
Hi, Antoine.
> [snip]
>
> That's probably the core of the problem: I can understand the distinction
> between the two levels (license for use and access rights) but the data that
> you get in the ISO field (with the mixture of free text and URL) would only
> fit the semantics of the less specific dc:rights. Unless you expunge the
> free text and just keep the URL, which then fits the use of dcterms:license.
Just to check if I understood your point:
Do you mean that dct:license can be used only with a URI pointing to
the licence itself, and if we have just text we must use dc:rights?
Or rather it is the wording of the text ("Reuse is athorised etc.")
that does not fit the specific notion of "licence"?
Thanks!
Andrea
Received on Tuesday, 15 September 2015 05:19:35 UTC