- From: Nandana Mihindukulasooriya <nmihindu@fi.upm.es>
- Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2015 16:56:25 +0200
- To: Public DWBP WG <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>
- Cc: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
Received on Friday, 4 September 2015 14:57:15 UTC
Hi Antoine, On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 4:38 PM, Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl> wrote: > > But to me the original problem with daq:QualityGraph (and qd:Dataset) is > that it's expected to contain only (statistical) measures [1], and that > this is absolutely not represented in the class name. Changing 'Graph' into > 'Dataset' won't solve this. What I need is something that says 'Statistics' > or 'Measures'. > > So I propose QualityStatistics or QualityMeasures. The latter being better > aligned (but also potentially mistaken) with the existing > dqv:QualityMeasure. > I personally prefer QualityMeasures rather than QualityStatistics because I think it more self-descriptive. But I agree with you that it might be confused (or at times mistyped) with dqv:QualityMeasure. So another option would be to use QualityMeasureDataset, if it is not too long. (It might actually fit as it is a subclass of the qb:DataSet which is for a set of dqv:QualityMeasure). Best Regards, Nandana
Received on Friday, 4 September 2015 14:57:15 UTC