W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dwbp-wg@w3.org > September 2015

Re: DQV, DAQ and Data Cube graphs - ISSUE 182

From: Nandana Mihindukulasooriya <nmihindu@fi.upm.es>
Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2015 16:56:25 +0200
Message-ID: <CAAOEr1nRL_FGrD-n+pn=dFxFBoXfPty-Hvvf48SQBx0wdJekdg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Public DWBP WG <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>
Cc: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
Hi Antoine,

On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 4:38 PM, Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl> wrote:
> But to me the original problem with daq:QualityGraph (and qd:Dataset) is
> that it's expected to contain only (statistical) measures [1], and that
> this is absolutely not represented in the class name. Changing 'Graph' into
> 'Dataset' won't solve this. What I need is something that says 'Statistics'
> or 'Measures'.
> So I propose QualityStatistics or QualityMeasures. The latter being better
> aligned (but also potentially mistaken) with the existing
> dqv:QualityMeasure.

I personally prefer QualityMeasures rather than QualityStatistics because I
think it more self-descriptive. But I agree with you that it might be
confused (or at times mistyped) with dqv:QualityMeasure. So another option
would be to use QualityMeasureDataset, if it is not too long. (It might
actually fit as it is a subclass of the qb:DataSet which is for a set of

Best Regards,
Received on Friday, 4 September 2015 14:57:15 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:39:41 UTC