- From: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
- Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2015 23:16:48 +0200
- To: <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>
Hi, > We will then discuss (and close!) a number of open issues from each of the vocabularies/deliverables ahead of the F2F, proposed by the editors. Starting with a a meta comment: maybe it would be good to sort the mess in the group's issues: https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/open For some reason there seems to be many more issues assigned to DUV than what there should be. There's been some discussion on a couple of DQV issues, it would be good to get the ball rolling on these, I'd say. http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/181 - Should we have only the existing class daq:QualityGraph or keep the new class dqv:QualityMetadata? http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/182 - The label of daq:QualityGraph does not fit well with the current model. Cheers, Antoine On 9/3/15 4:40 PM, Deirdre Lee wrote: > Hi, > > The agenda for tomorrow's meeting is online here: https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/Meetings:Telecon20150904 > > The first item on the agenda is to finalise the discussion on whether to remove/keep RFC2119 terms in the BP Doc. > > We will then discuss (and close!) a number of open issues from each of the vocabularies/deliverables ahead of the F2F, proposed by the editors. > > Talk to you tomorrow. > Deirdre > > -------------------------------------- > Deirdre Lee, Director > Derilinx - Linked & Open Data Solutions > > Web: www.derilinx.com > Email: deirdre@derilinx.com > Tel: +353 (0)1 254 4316 > Mob: +353 (0)87 417 2318 > Linkedin: ie.linkedin.com/in/leedeirdre/ > Twitter: @deirdrelee > > >
Received on Thursday, 3 September 2015 21:17:19 UTC