- From: Riccardo Albertoni <albertoni@ge.imati.cnr.it>
- Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2015 19:31:54 +0200
- To: Christophe Guéret <christophe.gueret@dans.knaw.nl>
- Cc: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>, Public DWBP WG <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>, "Debattista, Jeremy" <Jeremy.Debattista@iais.fraunhofer.de>
- Message-ID: <CAOHhXmQo0A-rmJA06JDAaS1wFP0Y0AbmDrpn6AyN1e6VSAxi1g@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Christophe, You are right, we don't need to keep the daq:QualityGraph as a rdfg:Graph, but we still need a subclass of qb:DataSet as range of the property qb:dataSet to facilitate the visualisation of the data as RDF cube. Considering that daq:QualityGraph is defined in Daq and we cannot change its definition, your proposal might be refined as Proposal 4: define in DQV the new class dqv:QualityDataset which replaces daq:QualityGraph, is defined as subclass of qb:DataSet, but it is not a subclass of RDFg:Graph. In this way, we get rid of the inner rdfg:Graph, we don't change daq:QualityGraph that can't be changed and we are compatible with the RDFCube. Does it work for you? We still have the issue of backward compatibility between DQV and DAQ. I guess this issue might be solved by defining daq:QualityGraph as subclass of dqv:QualityDataset, we might discuss this with DAQ designers, ( @Jeremy, what do you think? Does it work?) Concerning dqv:QualityMetadata, the outer RDFG:graph in the DQV schema, it basically groups all the quality statements for a datasets in a graph, so that we can easily track the provenance of quality statements; as far as I remember, tracking the provenance of the quality statement is one of the requirement on which we agree, and I like that DQV is providing an explicit guidance on it, but by deleting the outer graph, I think it gets lost. Before deleting the outer rdfg:graph, I wonder if you/we have an alternative design pattern, not relying on RDFG:Graph but keeping track of the "quality statement" provenance. Any proposal? Otherwise, I would prefer to keep the outer RDFG:graph in the DQV schema as it is. Regards, Riccardo On 2 September 2015 at 19:23, Riccardo Albertoni < riccardo.albertoni@ge.imati.cnr.it> wrote: > Hi Christophe, > You are right, we don't need to keep the daq:QualityGraph as a > rdfg:Graph, but we still need a subclass of qb:DataSet as range of the > property qb:dataSet > to facilitate the visualisation of the data as RDF cube. > > > Considering that daq:QualityGraph is defined in Daq and we cannot change > its definition, your proposal might be refined as > > Proposal 4: define in DQV the new class dqv:QualityDataset which > replaces daq:QualityGraph, is defined as subclass of qb:DataSet, but it > is not a subclass of RDFg:Graph. > > In this way, > we get rid of the inner rdfg:Graph, we don't change daq:QualityGraph > that can't be changed and we are compatible with the RDFCube. > Does it work for you? > > > We still have the issue of backward compatibility between DQV and DAQ. I > guess this issue might be solved by defining daq:QualityGraph as > subclass of dqv:QualityDataset, we might discuss this with DAQ designers, > ( @Jeremy, what do you think? Does it work?) > > Concerning dqv:QualityMetadata, the outer RDFG:graph in the DQV schema, > it basically groups all the quality statements for a datasets in a graph, > so that we can easily track the provenance of quality statements; > as far as I remember, tracking the provenance of the quality statement is > one of the requirement on which we agree, and I like that DQV is providing > an explicit guidance on it, but by deleting the outer graph, I think it > gets lost. > Before deleting the outer rdfg:graph, I wonder if you/we have an > alternative design pattern, not relying on RDFG:Graph but keeping track > of the "quality statement" provenance. Any proposal? > > Otherwise, I would prefer to keep the outer RDFG:graph in the DQV schema > as it is. > > Regards, > Riccardo > > -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Riccardo Albertoni Istituto per la Matematica Applicata e Tecnologie Informatiche "Enrico Magenes" Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche via de Marini 6 - 16149 GENOVA - ITALIA tel. +39-010-6475624 - fax +39-010-6475660 e-mail: Riccardo.Albertoni@ge.imati.cnr.it Skype: callto://riccardoalbertoni/ LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/riccardoalbertoni www: http://www.ge.imati.cnr.it/Albertoni http://purl.oclc.org/NET/riccardoAlbertoni FOAF:http://purl.oclc.org/NET/RiccardoAlbertoni/foaf
Received on Wednesday, 2 September 2015 17:32:21 UTC