- From: Debattista, Jeremy <Jeremy.Debattista@iais.fraunhofer.de>
- Date: Fri, 22 May 2015 19:39:15 +0000
- To: Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>
- CC: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>, Public DWBP WG <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>
Sure its doable. In any case the vocabulary is part of the quality framework which is also part of my phd Cheers, Jeremy On 22 May 2015, at 17:11, Phil Archer <phila@w3.org> wrote: > Some sort of pledge of persistence, pref backed by university library. > Should include commitment not to delete terms (deprecation and > clarification OK). > > Doable? > > Phil > > > >> Hi Phil, >> >> On 22 May 2015, at 15:02, Phil Archer <phila@w3.org<mailto:phila@w3.org>> >> wrote: >> >> On reusing DaQ: the fact that it is a project output (no matter how good >> that project may be) does make it a little risky. >> >> So, just for my information, what would be non-risky? >> >> Cheers, >> Jeremy >> > > > -- > > Sent from my phone. Please excuse typos.
Received on Friday, 22 May 2015 19:39:46 UTC