- From: Ghislain Atemezing <auguste.atemezing@eurecom.fr>
- Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 16:36:37 +0200
- To: Bernadette Farias Lóscio <bfl@cin.ufpe.br>
- Cc: "public-dwbp-wg@w3.org" <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 20 May 2015 14:37:08 UTC
> Le 20 mai 2015 à 16:26, Bernadette Farias Lóscio <bfl@cin.ufpe.br> a écrit : > > just one more question, does it make sense to say that when defining machine readable metadata existing standard terms/vocabularies should be used? For example, DCAT should be used to provide descriptive metadata. Yes..Even better, again IMHO... "When defining machine readable metadata, reusing existing standard terms and popular vocabularies are strongly recommended. For example, Dublin Core Metadata (DCMI) terms should be used to provide descriptive metadata” Ghislain --------------------------------------- Ghislain A. Atemezing, Ph.D ghislain.atemezing@gmail.com Google+: http://google.com/+GhislainATEMEZING Twitter: @gatemezing About Me: https://about.me/ghislain.atemezing <https://about.me/ghislain.atemezing>
Received on Wednesday, 20 May 2015 14:37:08 UTC