Bonjour Caroline,
Yes I think it would make sense to point to Memento as an implementation
option for accessing versions.
He is visiting DANS today so I can have a chat with him about the DWBP
documents if you want :)
Cheers,
Christophe
On 18 May 2015 at 23:16, Caroline Burle <cburle@nic.br> wrote:
> Bounjour, Christophe,
>
> We are editing the document and closing the external feedbacks[1]. We are
> wondering if Herberts comment makes sense to be included in the Data
> Preservation BP. Could you please take a look and let us know or even make
> direct changes on github.
>
> If you need any help, please let us know!
>
> Thank you! Kind regards,
> Caroline
>
>
> [1] https://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/68239/WD-dwbp-20150224/
>
> "The Memento protocol can play a significant role in the realm of access
> to preserved data, as is exemplified by its broad adoption by web archives
> and the demonstration implementation of the DBpedia archive. But it also
> plays a role in making preserved/captured resources recognizable via the
> Memento-Datetime header (expresses datetime of capture/preservation) and
> the HTTP Link header that carries an "original" link that connects a
> preserved/captured resource with the URI where it originally resided."
>
--
Onderzoeker
DANS, Anna van Saksenlaan 51, 2593 HW Den Haag
+31(0)6 14576494
christophe.gueret@dans.knaw.nl
*Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS/KNAW)*[image:
http://dans.knaw.nl] <http://dans.knaw.nl>
*e-Humanities Group (KNAW)*
[image: eHumanities] <http://www.ehumanities.nl/>
*World Wide Semantic Web community*
http://worldwidesemanticweb.org/