Re: More feedback on DQV

On 5/12/15 6:31 PM, Riccardo Albertoni wrote:

>
>     In the meantime on the current draft [1] you wrote "After we get a kind of minimal agreement on this early data quality vocabulary, it should be very difficult to extend and refine the schema in order to meet most of the requirements listed in Requirements From FPWD BP and Quality Requirements >From UCR"
>     What kind of difficulty do you foresee?
>
>   Sorry it is a typo,  I meant "it shouln't be very difficult";) .


Wonderful, thanks, Riccardo :-)
Typo fixed now!

Antoine

Received on Tuesday, 12 May 2015 22:14:15 UTC