RE: Thought for URI section

Hoi Phil, Makx,

We ran into similar issues when working on the publication of the UDC
master reference file as LOD. For it there is a need for both version-based
URI so that people can point to a specific release of the concept and
version-free URIs to point to whatever is the current version.

It has been decided to always create versioned URIs and establish redirects
from their version-less counterparts. Works fine on the paper, we are still
looking for the resources to implement it ;-)

Cheers,
Christophe

--
Sent with difficulties. Sorry for the brievety and typos...
Op 30 apr. 2015 19:29 schreef "Makx Dekkers" <mail@makxdekkers.com>:

> Phil,
>
> Interesting issue. I'd like to mention that in work that is being done
> around the DCAT application profile for data portals in Europe (
> https://joinup.ec.europa.eu/node/137964/), it has been noted that in
> DCAT, the W3C recommendation for describing datasets, there is currently no
> recommended way to describe time series.
>
> As far as I am aware, the approach you suggest cannot be expressed in DCAT
> as it is now. For the Application Profile, there is a discussion on how to
> model time series in DCAT, and it is scheduled that a draft for public
> review will be issued in the middle of May.
>
> Makx.
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Phil Archer [mailto:phila@w3.org]
> > Sent: 30 April 2015 18:28
> > To: Public DWBP WG
> > Subject: Thought for URI section
> >
> > I'm using this as a jotter so I don't forget.
> >
> > I'm writing a doc and want to link to the 2014 Global Open Data Index.
> > Well, the index is at http://index.okfn.org/place/ and that shows the
> > 2014 results. If I want last year's I go to
> http://index.okfn.org/place/2013/.
> > But I want to link persistently to the 2014 set *today* that happens to
> be the
> > current one. Presumably when they do next year's index that will be at
> > http://index.okfn.org/place/ and the 2014 data will be at
> > http://index.okfn.org/place/2014 - but that doesn't exist yet.
> >
> > That's more evidence, IMO, that for any time series you always need a
> dated
> > URI and a latest version URI.
> >
> > Rant over.
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> >
> > Phil Archer
> > W3C Data Activity Lead
> > http://www.w3.org/2013/data/
> >
> > http://philarcher.org
> > +44 (0)7887 767755
> > @philarcher1
>
>
>