public-dwbp-wg@w3.org from January 2015 by date

Saturday, 31 January 2015

• Re: Clarifying timing etc. Eric Stephan

Friday, 30 January 2015

• Clarifying timing etc. Phil Archer
• Re: dwbp-ISSUE-144: There is a technological bias in several parts of the document [Best practices document(s)] Carlos Iglesias
• Re: Working on FPWD, more to do Phil Archer
• Status BP Friday 30 Jan Phil Archer
• dwbp-ISSUE-146 (TheNorm): Which section of a BP should be normative? [Best practices document(s)] Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: Agenda for Meeting - Future deliverable & milestone planning Christophe Guéret
• Re: Agenda for Meeting - Future deliverable & milestone planning Laufer
• Re: Agenda for Meeting - Future deliverable & milestone planning Eric

Thursday, 29 January 2015

• Re: Working on FPWD, more to do Phil Archer
• Re: Working on FPWD, more to do Annette Greiner
• Agenda for Meeting - Future deliverable & milestone planning Lee, Deirdre

Wednesday, 28 January 2015

• Re: Working on FPWD, more to do Bernadette Farias Lóscio
• Re: Working on FPWD, more to do Phil Archer
• Re: Working on FPWD, more to do Phil Archer
• Re: Working on FPWD, more to do Eric Stephan
• Re: Working on FPWD, more to do Antoine Isaac

Tuesday, 27 January 2015

• Re: Deferred to Linked Data Best Practices for vocab re-use Antoine Isaac
• Working on FPWD, more to do Phil Archer
• Re: Deferred to Linked Data Best Practices for vocab re-use Phil Archer
• April Face to Face - who's coming? Phil Archer

Monday, 26 January 2015

• Re: Deferred to Linked Data Best Practices for vocab re-use Antoine Isaac
• Deferred to Linked Data Best Practices for vocab re-use Phil Archer
• Re: dwbp-ISSUE-144: There is a technological bias in several parts of the document [Best practices document(s)] Caroline Burle
• Re: OK to freeze the BP doc please? Newton Calegari
• OK to freeze the BP doc please? Phil Archer
• dwbp-ISSUE-145 (Caroline Burle): Define an actionable best practice for the BP7 [Best practices document(s)] Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker

Sunday, 25 January 2015

• dwbp-ISSUE-144: There is a technological bias in several parts of the document [Best practices document(s)] Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• dwbp-ISSUE-143: Data Preservation BP should be reviewed [Best practices document(s)] Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker

Friday, 23 January 2015

• Short URI request Phil Archer
• Re: comments on section 7.4 Antoine Isaac
• dwbp-ACTION-136: Create a wiki page to begin a glossary of terminology Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: BP 7, provide unique identifiers Annette Greiner
• The BP Document yaso@nic.br
• Re: A suggestion: Add status flags to BPs? Carlos Iglesias
• Re: dwbp-ACTION-114: Complete use case and requirements for data enrichment. related to issue-72 Adriano C. Machado Pereira
• Re: A suggestion: Add status flags to BPs? Bernadette Farias Lóscio
• Re: A suggestion: Add status flags to BPs? Laufer
• Re: comments on section 7.4 Carlos Iglesias
• Re: comments on section 7.4 Antoine Isaac
• Re: Comments on Best Practice document Bernadette Farias Lóscio
• Re: A suggestion: Add status flags to BPs? Carlos Iglesias
• Re: comments on section 7.4 Antoine Isaac
• Re: A suggestion: Add status flags to BPs? Bernadette Farias Lóscio
• Re: dwbp-ISSUE-137 (BernadetteLoscio): Review BP Preserve person's right to privacy [Best practices document(s)] Eric Stephan
• Re: A suggestion: Add status flags to BPs? Eric Stephan
• Re: A suggestion: Add status flags to BPs? Eric Stephan
• Re: A suggestion: Add status flags to BPs? Ghislain Atemezing
• A suggestion: Add status flags to BPs? Phil Archer
• RE: BP 7, provide unique identifiers Makx Dekkers
• Re: comments on section 7.4 Carlos Iglesias
• RE: Comments on Best Practice document Makx Dekkers
• Re: BP 7, provide unique identifiers Carlos Iglesias
• Re: Comments on Best Practice document Carlos Iglesias
• Re: on the relation between DWBP Best Practices Document and the Linked Data Best Practices Working Group Note of GLD Joao Paulo Almeida
• Re: comments on section 7.4 Joao Paulo Almeida
• Re: on the relation between DWBP Best Practices Document and the Linked Data Best Practices Working Group Note of GLD Antoine Isaac
• RE: Comments on Best Practice document Makx Dekkers
• RE: BP 7, provide unique identifiers Makx Dekkers
• Re: comments on section 7.4 Antoine Isaac

Thursday, 22 January 2015

• Re: BP 7, provide unique identifiers Annette Greiner
• Re: Comments on Best Practice document Carlos Iglesias
• BP 7, provide unique identifiers Annette Greiner
• dwbp-ISSUE-142: About multilingualism [Best practices document(s)] Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• dwbp-ISSUE-141: title and subtitle are normative ? [Best practices document(s)] Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• dwbp-ISSUE-140: Should we include the data lifecycle in the best practices document? [Best practices document(s)] Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: BP - BP14 reuse vocabularies Antoine Isaac
• notes on introductory material Annette Greiner
• dwbp-ISSUE-139 (BernadetteLoscio): Suggests additional content for BP1 implementation [Best practices document(s)] Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• dwbp-ISSUE-138 (BernadetteLoscio): Should we split Use machine-readable standardized data formats BP in two? [Best practices document(s)] Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: Excel??!! Annette Greiner
• Re: [dwbp] Suggests additional content for BP1 implementation (#87) Carlos Iglesias
• Re: Excel??!! Annette Greiner
• Re: My review of the DWBP 21st Jan editor's draft Carlos Iglesias
• Re: Excel??!! Carlos Iglesias
• Re: My review of the DWBP 21st Jan editor's draft Christophe Guéret
• Re: Excel??!! Bernadette Farias Lóscio
• On multilingualism Makx Dekkers
• Re: Excel??!! Annette Greiner
• RE: [dwbp] Suggests additional content for BP1 implementation (#87) Makx Dekkers
• dwbp-ISSUE-137 (BernadetteLoscio): Review BP Preserve person's right to privacy [Best practices document(s)] Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: [dwbp] Suggests additional content for BP1 implementation (#87) Carlos Iglesias
• Re: [dwbp] Suggests additional content for BP1 implementation (#87) Carlos Iglesias
• Best Practice 20: Preserve person's right to privacy Makx Dekkers
• Re: [dwbp] Suggests additional content for BP1 implementation (#87) Phil Archer
• RE: [dwbp] Suggests additional content for BP1 implementation (#87) Makx Dekkers
• Re: [dwbp] Suggests additional content for BP1 implementation (#87) Phil Archer
• Comments on Best Practice document Makx Dekkers
• RE: dwbp-ISSUE-135 (BernadetteLoscio): Use of RFC2119 [Best practices document(s)] Makx Dekkers
• Re: comments on section 7.4 Ig Ibert Bittencourt
• Issues disabled on GitHub Phil Archer
• Re: [dwbp] Suggests additional content for BP1 implementation (#87) Phil Archer
• Re: My review of the DWBP 21st Jan editor's draft Carlos Iglesias
• dwbp-ISSUE-136 (BernadetteLoscio): Proposal for Metadata BP Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• dwbp-ISSUE-135 (BernadetteLoscio): Use of RFC2119 [Best practices document(s)] Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: on the relation between DWBP Best Practices Document and the Linked Data Best Practices Working Group Note of GLD Bernadette Farias Lóscio
• Re: on the relation between DWBP Best Practices Document and the Linked Data Best Practices Working Group Note of GLD João Paulo Almeida
• dwbp-ISSUE-134 (BernadetteLoscio): About Formats, schemas, vocabularies and data models [Best practices document(s)] Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• comments on section 7.4 João Paulo Almeida
• Re: on the relation between DWBP Best Practices Document and the Linked Data Best Practices Working Group Note of GLD Bernadette Farias Lóscio
• Re: My review of the DWBP 21st Jan editor's draft Phil Archer
• Re: About Best Practice: Use a trusted serialisation format for preserved data dumps Christophe Guéret
• About Best Practice: Use a trusted serialisation format for preserved data dumps Bernadette Farias Lóscio
• Re: BP - use of RFC2119 Christophe Guéret
• Re: [dwbp] BP - URI structure is not relevant for REST yaso@nic.br
• Re: [dwbp] BP - URI structure is not relevant for REST Newton Calegari
• Re: dwbp-ISSUE-133 (Standard metadata): SHOULD or MUST metadata be provided using standard terms [Best practices document(s)] Laufer
• dwbp-ISSUE-133 (Standard metadata): SHOULD or MUST metadata be provided using standard terms [Best practices document(s)] Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• RE: Minor updates to UCR Lee, Deirdre
• Re: Minor updates to UCR Ghislain Atemezing
• Re: The document needs editing by a native English speaker Caroline Burle
• The document needs editing by a native English speaker Caroline Burle
• Re: Minor updates to UCR Phil Archer
• Code lists Issue-48 Phil Archer
• Excel??!! Phil Archer
• RE: dwbp-ACTION-114: Complete use case and requirements for data enrichment. related to issue-72 Lee, Deirdre
• RE: Minor updates to UCR Lee, Deirdre
• Agenda for Meeting - Voting on PWD of UCR and BP docs Lee, Deirdre
• Re: BP - BP14 reuse vocabularies Ghislain Atemezing
• Re: Formats, schemas, vocabularies, data models and section 7.4 of the Best Practices document Laufer
• Re: BP - BP14 reuse vocabularies Antoine Isaac
• Re: Formats, schemas, vocabularies, data models and section 7.4 of the Best Practices document Antoine Isaac
• Formats, schemas, vocabularies, data models and section 7.4 of the Best Practices document Joao Paulo Almeida
• Re: Best Practice 4 (Document Metadata) - I agree to suppress it Carlos Iglesias
• Re: BP - BP14 reuse vocabularies Carlos Iglesias

Wednesday, 21 January 2015

• Re: My review of the DWBP 21st Jan editor's draft Carlos Iglesias
• Re: My review of the DWBP 21st Jan editor's draft Antoine Isaac
• Re: [dwbp] BP - URI structure is not relevant for REST Carlos Iglesias
• Re: Best Practice 4 (Document Metadata) - I agree to suppress it Carlos Iglesias
• BP - use of RFC2119 Antoine Isaac
• BP - BP14 reuse vocabularies Antoine Isaac
• My review of the DWBP 21st Jan editor's draft Carlos Iglesias
• Re: Best Practice 4 (Document Metadata) - I agree to suppress it Annette Greiner
• Re: Best Practice 4 (Document Metadata) - I agree to suppress it Bernadette Farias Lóscio
• Re: Best Practice 4 (Document Metadata) - I agree to suppress it Carlos Iglesias
• Re: Best Practice 4 (Document Metadata) - I agree to suppress it Carlos Iglesias
• Re: Best Practice 4 (Document Metadata) - I agree to suppress it Bernadette Farias Lóscio
• [dwbp] BP - URI structure is not relevant for REST Newton Calegari
• Re: Best Practice 4 (Document Metadata) - I agree to suppress it Laufer

Tuesday, 20 January 2015

• Re: Best Practice 4 (Document Metadata) - I agree to suppress it Carlos Iglesias
• Re: Best Practice 2 - Title and the use of the term format Carlos Iglesias
• Re: Best Practice 4 (Document Metadata) - I agree to suppress it Annette Greiner
• on the relation between DWBP Best Practices Document and the Linked Data Best Practices Working Group Note of GLD João Paulo Almeida
• Re: Best Practice 2 - Title and the use of the term format Annette Greiner
• Re: Best Practice 4 (Document Metadata) - I agree to suppress it Bernadette Farias Lóscio
• Re: Best Practice 4 (Document Metadata) - I agree to suppress it Joao Paulo Almeida
• Re: Best Practice 4 (Document Metadata) - I agree to suppress it Laufer
• Re: Best Practice 4 (Document Metadata) - I agree to suppress it Bernadette Farias Lóscio
• RE: Best Practice 2 - Title and the use of the term format Manuel.CARRASCO-BENITEZ@ec.europa.eu
• Re: Best Practice 2 - Title and the use of the term format Bernadette Farias Lóscio

Monday, 19 January 2015

• Re: Sequencial numbering of BPs Bernadette Farias Lóscio
• Re: Sequencial numbering of BPs Phil Archer
• Re: Sequencial numbering of BPs Laufer
• Best Practice 4 (Document Metadata) - I agree to suppress it Laufer
• Re: Sequencial numbering of BPs Bernadette Farias Lóscio
• Re: Sequencial numbering of BPs Laufer
• Re: Sequencial numbering of BPs Bernadette Farias Lóscio
• RE: Best Practice 2 - Title and the use of the term format Eric Kauz
• Sequencial numbering of BPs Laufer
• Call to review BP Document Bernadette Farias Lóscio
• Best Practice 2 - Title and the use of the term format Laufer
• Minor updates to UCR Phil Archer

Sunday, 18 January 2015

• Re: dwbp-ISSUE-123 (Sensitive Data): Use of SHOULD versus MUST for Sensitive Data [Best practices document(s)] Annette Greiner

Saturday, 17 January 2015

• Re: dwbp-ISSUE-123 (Sensitive Data): Use of SHOULD versus MUST for Sensitive Data [Best practices document(s)] Eric
• dwbp-ISSUE-132 (BernadetteLoscio): Review Document Metadata BP [Best practices document(s)] Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• dwbp-ISSUE-131 (BernadetteLoscio): Follow REST principles when designing APIs BP is incomplete. [Best practices document(s)] Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• dwbp-ISSUE-130 (BernadetteLoscio): Reuse vocabularies BP is incomplete [Best practices document(s)] Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• dwbp-ISSUE-129 (BernadetteLoscio): Review specialization hierarchies between BP [Best practices document(s)] Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker

Friday, 16 January 2015

• Re: dwbp-ACTION-114: Complete use case and requirements for data enrichment. related to issue-72 Adriano C. Machado Pereira
• Re: Firefox does not like the BP doc Antoine Isaac
• Re: First Complete Draft of BP Document Laufer
• Re: First Complete Draft of BP Document Eric Stephan
• First Complete Draft of BP Document Bernadette Farias Lóscio
• dwbp-ISSUE-128: To discuss about BP specialization [Best practices document(s)] Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• RE: BP vocabulary section - update Eric Kauz
• Re: dwbp-ISSUE-127 (BernadetteLoscio): Discuss the use of SchemaVer on the Implementation of the Provide Versioning Information BP [Best practices document(s)] Newton Calegari
• Re: BP vocabulary section - update Bernadette Farias Lóscio
• Re: Help on Data Versioning section Christophe Guéret
• Firefox does not like the BP doc Christophe Guéret
• Re: BP vocabulary section - update Antoine Isaac
• Apologies Mcgibbney, Lewis J (398M)

Thursday, 15 January 2015

• Re: Data Access Annette Greiner
• Re: Data Access Bernadette Farias Lóscio
• dwbp-ISSUE-127 (BernadetteLoscio): Discuss the use of SchemaVer on the Implementation of the Provide Versioning Information BP [Best practices document(s)] Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• dwbp-ISSUE-126 (BernadetteLoscio): Review the specialization hierarchy between Provide Metadata BP and other BP [Best practices document(s)] Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• dwbp-ISSUE-125 (BernadetteLoscio): Discuss the relation between DWBP and Best Practices for Publishing Linked Data [Best practices document(s)] Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: BP vocabulary section - update Bernadette Farias Lóscio
• dwbp-ISSUE-124 (BernadetteLoscio): Overlap between Best Practices for Publishing Linked Data and DWBP [Best practices document(s)] Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: dwbp-ISSUE-120 (BernadetteLoscio): BP Document metadata x BP Provide metadata in different formats x BP Document Vocabularies [Best practices document(s)] Antoine Isaac
• Re: dwbp-ISSUE-120 (BernadetteLoscio): BP Document metadata x BP Provide metadata in different formats x BP Document Vocabularies [Best practices document(s)] Bernadette Farias Lóscio
• Re: What time should we stop entering changes to BP document? yaso@nic.br
• Agenda for tomorrow's call — and an extra call next week for the BP doc Hadley Beeman
• Re: What time should we stop entering changes to BP document? Annette Greiner
• dwbp-ISSUE-123 (Sensitive Data): Use of SHOULD versus MUST for Sensitive Data [Best practices document(s)] Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: What time should we stop entering changes to BP document? yaso@nic.br
• Re: Data Access yaso@nic.br
• Re: BP: identification and granularity Bernadette Farias Lóscio
• BP: identification and granularity Manuel.CARRASCO-BENITEZ@ec.europa.eu
• Re: What time should we stop entering changes to BP document? Bernadette Farias Lóscio
• dwbp-ISSUE-122 (BernadetteLoscio): Review Provide Metadata Standardized BP [Best practices document(s)] Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• dwbp-ISSUE-121 (BernadetteLoscio): Requirements for human readable metadata [Best practices document(s)] Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: What time should we stop entering changes to BP document? Eric Stephan
• Re: What time should we stop entering changes to BP document? Bernadette Farias Lóscio
• What time should we stop entering changes to BP document? Eric Stephan
• Re: Help on Data Versioning section Annette Greiner
• Re: dwbp-ISSUE-120 (BernadetteLoscio): BP Document metadata x BP Provide metadata in different formats x BP Document Vocabularies [Best practices document(s)] Antoine Isaac

Wednesday, 14 January 2015

• BP vocabulary section - update Antoine Isaac
• Re: Data Access Bernadette Farias Lóscio
• Data Access yaso@nic.br
• Re: dwbp-ISSUE-119 (BernadetteLoscio): Data Consumer x Data User [Best practices document(s)] yaso@nic.br
• Help with Data Identification section Bernadette Farias Lóscio
• Re: More BPs added Bernadette Farias Lóscio
• Re: Best Practice 1: Provide metadata Laufer
• Re: dwbp-ISSUE-119 (BernadetteLoscio): Data Consumer x Data User [Best practices document(s)] Annette Greiner
• Re: Best Practice 1: Provide metadata Phil Archer
• dwbp-ISSUE-120 (BernadetteLoscio): BP Document metadata x BP Provide metadata in different formats x BP Document Vocabularies [Best practices document(s)] Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: Best Practice 1: Provide metadata Laufer
• Re: More BPs added Christophe Guéret
• Re: Best Practice 1: Provide metadata Phil Archer
• Re: dwbp-ISSUE-119 (BernadetteLoscio): Data Consumer x Data User [Best practices document(s)] Laufer
• Best Practice 1: Provide metadata Laufer
• Re: dwbp-ISSUE-109 (machine Readable Licence?): No UCR for machine readable licences [Best practices document(s)] Riccardo Albertoni
• Re: dwbp-ISSUE-119 (BernadetteLoscio): Data Consumer x Data User [Best practices document(s)] Ghislain Atemezing
• RE: dwbp-ISSUE-119 (BernadetteLoscio): Data Consumer x Data User [Best practices document(s)] Eric Kauz
• Re: dwbp-ISSUE-119 (BernadetteLoscio): Data Consumer x Data User [Best practices document(s)] Eric Stephan
• Re: More BPs added Bernadette Farias Lóscio
• Re: More BPs added Bernadette Farias Lóscio
• Re: dwbp-ISSUE-119 (BernadetteLoscio): Data Consumer x Data User [Best practices document(s)] Adriano C. Machado Pereira
• Re: dwbp-ISSUE-119 (BernadetteLoscio): Data Consumer x Data User [Best practices document(s)] Bernadette Farias Lóscio
• Re: dwbp-ISSUE-119 (BernadetteLoscio): Data Consumer x Data User [Best practices document(s)] Christophe Guéret
• Re: More BPs added Annette Greiner
• Re: More BPs added Annette Greiner

Tuesday, 13 January 2015

• Re: dwbp-ISSUE-119 (BernadetteLoscio): Data Consumer x Data User [Best practices document(s)] Makx Dekkers
• dwbp-ISSUE-119 (BernadetteLoscio): Data Consumer x Data User [Best practices document(s)] Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: More BPs added Christophe Guéret
• Data Sensitivity BP and first draft... Eric Stephan
• Re: More BPs added Phil Archer
• Re: More BPs added Bernadette Farias Lóscio
• More BPs added Phil Archer

Monday, 12 January 2015

• RE: BP vocabulary section Eric Kauz
• Writing BPs, ISSUE-106 Phil Archer
• Re: Updated version of UCR document online Bernadette Farias Lóscio

Sunday, 11 January 2015

• RE: dwbp-ISSUE-96 (Share-PSI): Is the WG happy with the Share-PSI use case [Use Cases & Requirements Document] Lee, Deirdre
• RE: dwbp-ISSUE-118: New Requirement suggestion R-VersionURIDesign [Use Cases & Requirements Document] Lee, Deirdre
• dwbp-ISSUE-118: New Requirement suggestion R-VersionURIDesign [Use Cases & Requirements Document] Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• RE: dwbp-ACTION-114: Complete use case and requirements for data enrichment. related to issue-72 Lee, Deirdre
• RE: Updated version of UCR document online Lee, Deirdre
• Re: Draft BP Provenance intro section complete Bernadette Farias Lóscio
• Re: dwbp-ISSUE-116 (RiccardoAlbertoni): Best Practices for Data Quality - Insertion of specific strategies [Best practices document(s)] Bernadette Farias Lóscio
• Re: dwbp-ISSUE-117 (RiccardoAlbertoni): Should Data quality vocabulary be mentioned as specific strategy in BP Document? [Best practices document(s)] Bernadette Farias Lóscio
• Re: Updated version of UCR document online Bernadette Farias Lóscio
• Updated version of UCR document online Lee, Deirdre
• RE: dwbp-ISSUE-92 (Dropping Formats): OK to drop last word of 'Requirements for Data Formats' from challenges/req list? [Use Cases & Requirements Document] Lee, Deirdre
• RE: dwbp-ISSUE-95 (MSI): Requirements derived from MSI use case [Use Cases & Requirements Document] Lee, Deirdre
• RE: dwbp-ISSUE-83 (LuSTRE): New Reqs from LuSTRE Use Case [Use Cases & Requirements Document] Lee, Deirdre
• RE: dwbp-ISSUE-89 (R-SoftwareDataUsage): New req: Data should be annotated with descriptions of software applications using the data [Use Cases & Requirements Document] Lee, Deirdre
• RE: dwbp-ISSUE-90 (R-UsageFeedback): new req: Data consumers should have a way of sharing feedback and rating data [Use Cases & Requirements Document] Lee, Deirdre
• RE: dwbp-ISSUE-98 (R-QualityOpinions): R-QualityOpinions and R-IncorporateFeedback seem to be duplicates? [Use Cases & Requirements Document] Lee, Deirdre
• RE: dwbp-ISSUE-88 (R-DesignatedThingsServiceProviders): New req: Data produced by things or services should be associated with complete things/services metadata descriptions. [Use Cases & Requirements Document] Lee, Deirdre
• RE: dwbp-ISSUE-91 (R-Location): New req: Locations (countries, regions, cities etc.) must be referred to consistently [Use Cases & Requirements Document] Lee, Deirdre
• RE: dwbp-ISSUE-87 (R-DesignatedUserExpertise): New req: Data should be designated if either by virtue of its complexity or its nature is relevant to users with specific expertise. [Use Cases & Requirements Document] Lee, Deirdre

Saturday, 10 January 2015

• RE: dwbp-ISSUE-103 (User types): Should we talk about the diff types of user [Best practices document(s)] Makx Dekkers
• RE: dwbp-ISSUE-97 (Axoims in UCR): Should we include the three axioms in the UCR [Use Cases & Requirements Document] Lee, Deirdre
• dwbp-ISSUE-117 (RiccardoAlbertoni): Should Data quality vocabulary be mentioned as specific strategy in BP Document? [Best practices document(s)] Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• dwbp-ISSUE-116 (RiccardoAlbertoni): Best Practices for Data Quality - Insertion of specific strategies [Best practices document(s)] Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: Draft BP Provenance intro section complete Eric Stephan
• Draft BP Provenance intro section complete Eric Stephan

Friday, 9 January 2015

• Re: dwbp-ISSUE-105 (MD or BP for MD): Metadata or Best Practices for Metadata? [Best practices document(s)] Bernadette Farias Lóscio
• Re: dwbp-ISSUE-105 (MD or BP for MD): Metadata or Best Practices for Metadata? [Best practices document(s)] Phil Archer
• Re: dwbp-ISSUE-105 (MD or BP for MD): Metadata or Best Practices for Metadata? [Best practices document(s)] Antoine Isaac
• [dwbp] Contributing on Github Newton Calegari
• Re: BP vocabulary section Antoine Isaac
• BP vocabulary section - ontologies vs "controlled vocabularies" Antoine Isaac
• RE: BP vocabulary section Eric Kauz
• BP vocabulary section Antoine Isaac
• dwbp-ISSUE-115 (Share-PSI): Can we align Share-PSI and DWBP templates? [Best practices document(s)] Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• dwbp-ISSUE-114 (Feedback): Feedback required? [Best practices document(s)] Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• dwbp-ISSUE-113 (Versioning): No req for versioning? [Best practices document(s)] Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• dwbp-ISSUE-112 (R-AccessUptodate): R-AccessUptodate for data Access? [Best practices document(s)] Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• dwbp-ISSUE-111 (Def: Granularity): What is data Granularity? [Best practices document(s)] Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• dwbp-ISSUE-110 (DQV in BP?): Data Quality vocab reqs in BP Doc? [Best practices document(s)] Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• dwbp-ISSUE-109 (machine Readable Licence?): No UCR for machine readable licences [Best practices document(s)] Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• dwbp-ISSUE-108 (R-FormatLocalize): Where does R-FormatLocalize go? [Best practices document(s)] Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• dwbp-ISSUE-107 (Similar Reqs): R-MultipleRepresentations and R-FormatMultiple [Best practices document(s)] Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• dwbp-ISSUE-106 (Req Meaning): Meaning of R-MetadataStandardized & R-MetadataDocument [Best practices document(s)] Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• dwbp-ISSUE-105 (MD or BP for MD): Metadata or Best Practices for Metadata? [Best practices document(s)] Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• dwbp-ISSUE-104 (Evidence of Relevance): Can we say that the evidence section shows the relevance of the BP? [Best practices document(s)] Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• dwbp-ISSUE-103 (User types): Should we talk about the diff types of user [Best practices document(s)] Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• dwbp-ISSUE-102 (UC-BP link): Uuse Cases-BP links [Best practices document(s)] Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• dwbp-ISSUE-101 (Challenges table): Should we use a table to present the challenges? [Best practices document(s)] Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• dwbp-ISSUE-100 (BPs and Lifecyle): organising BPs around Life Cycle [Best practices document(s)] Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: COMURI and the BP document Christophe Guéret
• COMURI and the BP document Bernadette Farias Lóscio
• RE: COMURI Manuel.CARRASCO-BENITEZ@ec.europa.eu

Thursday, 8 January 2015

• Re: Agenda for tomorrow's telco Nathalia Sautchuk Patrício
• RE: Call for comments on open questions about the audience for the DWBP doc Steven Adler
• RE: Lifecycle "Big picture"--quick and dirty draft Steven Adler
• Re: Call for comments on open questions about the audience for the DWBP doc Steven Adler
• Re: AusGOAL Qualities of Open Data Steven Adler
• RE: audience for the BP doc Steven Adler
• Re: COMURI Steven Adler
• Re: Call for comments on open questions about the audience for the DWBP doc Adriano C. Machado Pereira
• Call for Contributors Bernadette Farias Lóscio
• Agenda for tomorrow's telco Lee, Deirdre
• Re: Call for comments on open questions about the audience for the DWBP doc Ingo Simonis
• Re: Call for comments on open questions about the audience for the DWBP doc Phil Archer
• Re: Call for comments on open questions about the audience for the DWBP doc Bernadette Farias Lóscio

Wednesday, 7 January 2015

• Re: Call for comments on open questions about the audience for the DWBP doc Annette Greiner
• Re: Call for comments on open questions about the audience for the DWBP doc Eric Stephan
• Re: Call for comments on open questions about the audience for the DWBP doc Annette Greiner
• Re: Call for comments on open questions about the audience for the DWBP doc Yaso
• Re: Call for comments on open questions about the audience for the DWBP doc Phil Archer
• Re: Call for comments on open questions about the audience for the DWBP doc Annette Greiner
• Re: Call for comments on open questions about the audience for the DWBP doc Laufer
• Re: Call for comments on open questions about the audience for the DWBP doc Eric Stephan
• COMURI Manuel.CARRASCO-BENITEZ@ec.europa.eu
• RE: Call for comments on open questions about the audience for the DWBP doc Makx Dekkers
• Re: Call for comments on open questions about the audience for the DWBP doc Bernadette Farias Lóscio

Last message date: Saturday, 31 January 2015 17:36:13 UTC