- From: Laufer <laufer@globo.com>
- Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2015 11:14:44 -0300
- To: Hadley Beeman <hadley@linkedgov.org>
- Cc: DWBP Public List <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CA+pXJigxk3G=P=6SbUjeAeD1dXEr_-yV6y4MgTbep+nU-e7eUg@mail.gmail.com>
Hi, Hadley, Could we include a discussion about a more complete information about the Austin site. I want to make the reservations for the F2F meeting and need to know the things. As I understood, the meeting will be in the Hyatt Regency Austin. Is that correct? Cheers, Laufer 2015-02-26 9:41 GMT-03:00 Hadley Beeman <hadley@linkedgov.org>: > Hi all, > > The agenda for tomorrow's call is now up, and is pasted here for your > convenience. Lots of good stuff to discuss! Looking forward to seeing you > tomorrow. > > Cheers, > > Hadley > > https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/Meetings:Telecon20150227 > > > Main agenda > > Today is a vocabularies meeting! > > > We have three things to settle today: > > 1. Question 1: Should the Data Usage vocabulary and the Data Quality > vocabulary be one vocabulary? We should decide this today. > 2. Question 2: Should the Data vocabulary(ies) be extensions of DCAT? > Or is it too early to tell? > 3. Question 3: (to the vocabulary editors): We have a year and a bit > left for this working group. How do we plan out milestones to get this done? > > > Ideally, we could/should demonstrate: > > - that what we recommend is currently in use (implementations) > - that we've had lots of outside input, and have responded (by > comments and replies) > - that the entire working group supports the recommendation (by > working group votes to publish) > > > But officially, we just need to vote to publish what is written. See > https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/Quality_vocab_timetable for more info > on our W3C obligations. > > -- . . . .. . . . . . .. . .. .
Received on Thursday, 26 February 2015 14:15:12 UTC