W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dwbp-wg@w3.org > February 2015

Re: dwbp-ISSUE-144: There is a technological bias in several parts of the document [Best practices document(s)]

From: Carlos Iglesias <contact@carlosiglesias.es>
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 22:49:24 +0100
Message-ID: <CAAa1XzksxKhSVtJjyxZG-Li7qa+nn+pP8bmYxuQPhryCnoYRrQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: João Paulo Almeida <jpalmeida@ieee.org>
Cc: Christophe Guéret <christophe.gueret@dans.knaw.nl>, Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>, "public-dwbp-wg@w3.org" <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>
>
>
> We must not be apologetic about using Web concepts. Being too abstract
> diminishes the usability of our recommendation.
>
> Further, we need to be careful not to censor ourselves with respect to
> notions related to linked data… we have to find the right balance and the
> right way to phrase the best practices.
>

Just one more time, please note that nobody is trying to censor LD here in
any way. The discussion is just about what're the right places and sections
in the document to make reference to specific technologies.

Best,
 CI.





> From: Christophe Guéret <christophe.gueret@dans.knaw.nl>
> Date: Tuesday, February 10, 2015 at 7:25 AM
> To: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
> Cc: "public-dwbp-wg@w3.org" <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>
> Subject: Re: dwbp-ISSUE-144: There is a technological bias in several
> parts of the document [Best practices document(s)]
> Resent-From: <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>
> Resent-Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 09:26:36 +0000
>
>
> Again I agree on the point of trying to be as general as possible. But I
>> still like to relate to concrete stuff while reading best practices (and
>> not only in the implementation section). If I see 'Web identifier', the
>> fact that 'URI' comes right next to it reassures me. Actually a BP document
>> seeking to avoid reference to the base technology of the time might make me
>> skeptical. After all, if the base technology change, then best practices
>> could become obsolete, no? I'd rather have a new group try and refresh the
>> best practices if this happens.
>>
> +1!
>
> Christophe
>
>
>
> --
> Onderzoeker
> +31(0)6 14576494
> christophe.gueret@dans.knaw.nl
>
> *Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS)*
>
> DANS bevordert duurzame toegang tot digitale onderzoeksgegevens. Kijk op
> www.dans.knaw.nl voor meer informatie. DANS is een instituut van KNAW en
> NWO.
>
>
> Let op, per 1 januari hebben we een nieuw adres:
>
> DANS | Anna van Saksenlaan 51 | 2593 HW Den Haag | Postbus 93067 | 2509 AB
> Den Haag | +31 70 349 44 50 | info@dans.knaw.nl <info@dans.kn> |
> www.dans.knaw.nl
>
>
> *Let's build a World Wide Semantic Web!*
> http://worldwidesemanticweb.org/
>
> *e-Humanities Group (KNAW)*
> [image: eHumanities] <http://www.ehumanities.nl/>
>


-- 
---

Carlos Iglesias.
Internet & Web Consultant.
+34 687 917 759
contact@carlosiglesias.es
@carlosiglesias
http://es.linkedin.com/in/carlosiglesiasmoro/en
Received on Thursday, 12 February 2015 21:49:58 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 12 February 2015 21:49:59 UTC