W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dwbp-wg@w3.org > February 2015

Re: dwbp-ISSUE-144: There is a technological bias in several parts of the document [Best practices document(s)]

From: Christophe Guéret <christophe.gueret@dans.knaw.nl>
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 10:25:38 +0100
Message-ID: <CABP9CAH9Ypx=dD+amau13G+qggxuzkX4pVn8cOhLM6WFdveXqg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
CC: "public-dwbp-wg@w3.org" <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>
> Again I agree on the point of trying to be as general as possible. But I
> still like to relate to concrete stuff while reading best practices (and
> not only in the implementation section). If I see 'Web identifier', the
> fact that 'URI' comes right next to it reassures me. Actually a BP document
> seeking to avoid reference to the base technology of the time might make me
> skeptical. After all, if the base technology change, then best practices
> could become obsolete, no? I'd rather have a new group try and refresh the
> best practices if this happens.


+31(0)6 14576494

*Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS)*

DANS bevordert duurzame toegang tot digitale onderzoeksgegevens. Kijk op
www.dans.knaw.nl voor meer informatie. DANS is een instituut van KNAW en

Let op, per 1 januari hebben we een nieuw adres:

DANS | Anna van Saksenlaan 51 | 2593 HW Den Haag | Postbus 93067 | 2509 AB
Den Haag | +31 70 349 44 50 | info@dans.knaw.nl <info@dans.kn> |

*Let's build a World Wide Semantic Web!*

*e-Humanities Group (KNAW)*
[image: eHumanities] <http://www.ehumanities.nl/>
Received on Tuesday, 10 February 2015 09:26:34 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:39:32 UTC