- From: Eric <ericphb@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2015 12:17:04 -0800
- To: Annette Greiner <amgreiner@lbl.gov>
- Cc: Public DWBP WG <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <3F244DB1-240D-4F1C-8629-56102E1B26CB@gmail.com>
It's a good question Annette. It is something we haven't formally defined yet. I'd really appreciate adding this data intensive perspective in implementation. It also brings to mind what we publish on the web. Do we publish the kitchen sink or do we filter? Please feel free to amend and add. Eric Sent from my iPhone > On Feb 1, 2015, at 11:42 AM, Annette Greiner <amgreiner@lbl.gov> wrote: > > I have a question about real-time data. When we say "data that is produced in real time," what does that mean? Is that a collection rate? I think the choice of whether to make data available real-time involves more than the frequency at which it is collected. For example, data from an accelerator like the LHC gets collected at an extremely high rate, but it is released in bulk. Maybe the rule should be more about whether individual values are updated frequently (how frequently?) on an ongoing basis. > -Annette > > Sent from my iPhone > >> On Feb 1, 2015, at 10:58 AM, Eric Stephan <ericphb@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> I've modified BP #24 [1] based on Phil's guidance [2] and referring to the earlier templates. I won't make any more additions today, hopefully will be back to it tomorrow morning. >> >> Thanks, >> >> Eric S. >> >> >> References >> >> [1] http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/bp.html#AccessRealTime >> [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-dwbp-wg/2015Jan/0303.html
Received on Sunday, 1 February 2015 20:17:34 UTC