Re: dwbp-ISSUE-213 (BP_REST): Changes on BP about REST APIs [Best practices document(s)]

Great, thanks!

2015-12-04 9:22 GMT-03:00 Yasodara <yaso@nic.br>:

> Of course, Berna!
> I'm working on this right now.
>
>
> yaso
>
>
>
> On 12/04/2015 10:17 AM, Bernadette Farias Lóscio wrote:
> > Hi Yaso,
> >
> > Thanks for the updates! Could you please also include some examples on
> the
> > BP according to the example that is being used in the DWBP doc [1]?
> >
> > Thanks!
> > Berna
> >
> > [1] http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/bp.html#basicExample
> >
> > 2015-12-04 9:09 GMT-03:00 Yasodara <yaso@nic.br>:
> >
> > > Hi Annete, Erik and everyone,
> > >
> > > I made a lot of changes in the draft proposed by Annete, hope to make a
> > > pull request at github for the editors, but it would be nice if you
> could
> > > take a look.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/13q2CvZjMkjXrg7Pv7aTRuU5UL2J_-py09Vs_zJoaLso/edit#
> > >
> > >
> > > yaso
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On 11/23/2015 08:24 PM, Annette Greiner wrote:
> > >> Hi Erik,
> > >> I can live with avoiding using the word REST when it isn't used to
> > >> describe an API that follows all the REST constraints, but there is a
> > >> webby coding style that most web API developers follow that often
> makes
> > >> use of hypermedia but doesn't rely on it for holding state. Developers
> > >> using this style do expose resources with consistent IDs identified by
> > >> URIs and manipulated via representations. What do you suggest we call
> > >> that approach?
> > >> -Annette
> > >>
> > >> On 11/23/15 12:26 AM, Erik Wilde wrote:
> > >>> On 2015-11-20 20:51, Annette Greiner wrote:
> > >>>> As a group, we have, I think wisely, avoided centering any of the
> best
> > >>>> practices on any single technology, because we want the practices to
> > > be
> > >>>> able to survive the forward progress of technology and popularity.
> We
> > >>>> can mention specific technologies in the implementation sections,
> > >>>> though.
> > >>>
> > >>> +1 for not recommending specific technologies, and +1 for maybe
> > >>> listing some as examples if that's a pattern throughout the spec.
> > >>>
> > >>>> I also believe we need to consider pragmatic REST as well as
> HATEOAS.
> > >>>
> > >>> REST has a proper definition. "pragmatic REST" doesn't (or it's
> > >>> something along the lines of "do whatever you like via HTTP, mostly
> > >>> use it like FTP with a different name").
> > >>>
> > >>> HATEOAS *as a name* should be avoided, people actively try to avoid
> it
> > >>> these days. call it hypermedia instead, and say that it's the essence
> > >>> of webbyness.
> > >>>
> > >>>>> On Nov 16, 2015, at 11:52 AM, Pieter Colpaert
> > >>>>> Instead I would suggest taking it a step further. When we combine
> > >>>>> REST, HATEOAS, Linked Data and HTTP for an Open Data API
> thoroughly,
> > >>>>> you'd come up with Hydra [1] (a community group [2] at W3C).
> Wouldn't
> > >>>>> it be better to create a best practise that says you need to weave
> > >>>>> your data documents together with Hydra?
> > >>>
> > >>> i concur with annette when it comes to not recommending specific
> > >>> technologies. also, you can make much more lightweight
> recommendations
> > >>> than this one, which means that people have to use the RDF metamodel.
> > >>>
> > >>> what might be a very lightweight and pragmatic best practice about
> > >>> hypermedia would by to say that one of the essential aspects of
> > >>> hypermedia are typed links:
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >
> https://github.com/dret/hyperpedia/blob/master/concepts.md#link-relation-type
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> and that when it comes to typed links, RFC 5988 and the resulting
> link
> > >>> type registry at
> > >>> http://www.iana.org/assignments/link-relations/link-relations.xhtml
> > >>> provide a simple foundation for anybody to build their vocabulary on.
> > >>>
> > >>> cheers,
> > >>>
> > >>> dret.
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >
> > > --
> > > -yaso
> > >
> > > CeWeb - Centro de estudos sobre tecnologias Web
> > > W3C Escritório Brasil
> > > NIC.br - CGI.br
> > > Phone: 55 11 5509-3537 (4025)
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
> --
> -yaso
>
> CeWeb - Centro de estudos sobre tecnologias Web
> W3C Escritório Brasil
> NIC.br - CGI.br
> Phone: 55 11 5509-3537 (4025)
>
>


-- 
Bernadette Farias Lóscio
Centro de Informática
Universidade Federal de Pernambuco - UFPE, Brazil
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Received on Friday, 4 December 2015 12:27:55 UTC