- From: Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2015 17:05:14 +0000
- To: Bernadette Farias Lóscio <bfl@cin.ufpe.br>, Newton Calegari <newton@nic.br>, Caroline Burle <cburle@nic.br>
- Cc: Public DWBP WG <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>
Dear BP editors, I've been spending some more time looking at the BP doc - it's looking better all the time. I know you've done a lot on it recently, so much so that I can't merge my changes. Don't care what people say, if 2 people are working on the doc at the same time, 99% of the time one of you is going to trash your local GH fork and start again. C'est la vie :-) Anyway, you can see what I've done at http://philarcher1.github.io/dwbp/bp.html#DataIdentifiers The first two BPs there now have examples that build on the running example of My City data. As a result of this, I've made a note that I'd really like to change the many instances of :dataset-001 to :timetable-001 (and equivalent changes throughout). This is because it makes more sense in the context of a persistent URI for the dataset. I've also been working with Christophe on examples for the Data preservation section. See http://philarcher1.github.io/dwbp/bp.html#EvaluateCandD I have more I want to do tomorrow before the meeting but that's where I'm up to for now. I also want to update the SVG diagram and turn those lists of benefits into HTML/CSS rather than the current image. And those SVG icons for the benefits should, I think, be separate files and incorporated as <img src="....svg" rather than written inline, no? And, finally, native-speaker pedantry coming up... Trustworthy should really be "Trustworthiness" but that's very long. How about simply 'Trust'? And one more thing, 'Accessibility' at W3C usually refers to the accessibility of Web pages (WCAG and all that). Would you be OK with simply calling that benefit 'Access'? Cheers Phil. -- Phil Archer W3C Data Activity Lead http://www.w3.org/2013/data/ http://philarcher.org +44 (0)7887 767755 @philarcher1
Received on Thursday, 3 December 2015 17:06:27 UTC