public-dwbp-wg@w3.org from December 2015 by date

Tuesday, 22 December 2015

• Re: Fwd: Best Practice 26.docx Pieter Colpaert
• Re: Fwd: Best Practice 26.docx Annette Greiner

Saturday, 19 December 2015

• Re: Removed domain and range from 3rd party vocabularies Eric Stephan
• Re: Removed domain and range from 3rd party vocabularies Laufer
• Removed domain and range from 3rd party vocabularies Eric Stephan

Friday, 18 December 2015

• Re: Some minor issue on DUV Riccardo Albertoni
• "HEADs" up on missing references ;-) Eric Stephan
• Re: Some minor issue on DUV Eric Stephan
• Some minor issue on DUV Riccardo Albertoni
• Re: [Moderator Action] Example 14: wrong media type Phil Archer
• dwbp-ISSUE-232 (MyCity CSV files): Sort out what is a CSV and what is a JSON file in the example [Best practices document(s)] Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker

Thursday, 17 December 2015

• Re: Publication Request for 2 Ordinary WDs Bernadette Farias Lóscio
• DUV Comments (2) Laufer
• Re: Publication Request for 2 Ordinary WDs Phil Archer

Wednesday, 16 December 2015

• Re: Data usage vocabulary continues to advance... Eric Stephan
• Re: Data usage vocabulary continues to advance... Bernadette Farias Lóscio
• Re: Data usage vocabulary continues to advance... Eric Stephan
• Re: Data usage vocabulary continues to advance... Laufer
• Re: Data usage vocabulary continues to advance... Phil Archer
• Re: Data usage vocabulary continues to advance... Eric Stephan
• Re: Data usage vocabulary continues to advance... Eric Stephan
• Re: Data usage vocabulary continues to advance... Bernadette Farias Lóscio
• Re: Data usage vocabulary continues to advance... Phil Archer
• Re: Data usage vocabulary continues to advance... Laufer
• Publication Request for 2 Ordinary WDs Phil Archer
• Re: Data usage vocabulary continues to advance... Eric Stephan
• Re: Data usage vocabulary continues to advance... Eric Stephan
• Re: Data usage vocabulary continues to advance... João Paulo Almeida
• Re: Data usage vocabulary continues to advance... Laufer
• Data usage vocabulary continues to advance... Eric Stephan
• Agenda for Friday's meeting Deirdre Lee
• Re: Issue raised (was Re: [Time sensitive] property names) Antoine Isaac
• Re: Issue raised (was Re: [Time sensitive] property names) Antoine Isaac
• Issue raised (was Re: [Time sensitive] property names) Phil Archer
• dwbp-ISSUE-231 (hasMetric): metric, hasMetric, something else [Quality & Granularity Vocabulary] Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker

Tuesday, 15 December 2015

• Re: [Time sensitive] property names Antoine Isaac
• Re: Pre-publication steps Newton Calegari
• Re: [Time sensitive] property names (was: Pre-publication steps) Phil Archer
• Re: [Time sensitive] property names (was: Pre-publication steps) Antoine Isaac
• Re: [Time sensitive] Re: Pre-publication steps Riccardo Albertoni
• Re: [Time sensitive] Re: Pre-publication steps Phil Archer
• Re: [Time sensitive] Re: Pre-publication steps Riccardo Albertoni
• Re: Challenges SVG updated Bernadette Farias Lóscio
• Re: [Time sensitive] Re: Pre-publication steps Riccardo Albertoni
• Re: [Time sensitive] Re: Pre-publication steps Phil Archer
• Re: [Time sensitive] Re: Pre-publication steps Debattista, Jeremy
• [Time sensitive] Re: Pre-publication steps Phil Archer

Monday, 14 December 2015

• Re: Fwd: Best Practice 26.docx Annette Greiner
• Re: Pre-publication steps Phil Archer
• Re: Pre-publication steps Riccardo Albertoni
• Challenges SVG updated Phil Archer

Friday, 11 December 2015

• Re: Best Practice 26.docx Bernadette Farias Lóscio
• Re: DUV Comments João Paulo Almeida
• Re: DUV Comments João Paulo Almeida
• Re: Pre-publication steps Eric Stephan
• Pre-publication steps Phil Archer
• Re: DUV Comments Phil Archer
• Re: DUV review Phil Archer
• Re: Mysterious changing property headers Eric Stephan
• Re: DUV Comments Eric Stephan
• Re: Mysterious changing property headers Phil Archer
• Re: DUV Comments Laufer
• Re: DUV Comments Eric Stephan
• DWBP comments Laufer
• Re: DUV review Eric Stephan
• DUV Comments Laufer
• Mysterious changing property headers Eric Stephan
• Fwd: Best Practice 26.docx Phil Archer
• dwbp-ACTION-224: Send a list of things to be added to/addressed in the duv document Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• DUV review Phil Archer
• Relation between dqv:qualityAssessment and Web Annotation motivations Antoine Isaac
• Re: Alignment between DWBP vocabularies and HCLS profile Antoine Isaac
• Re: And for DUV (was Re: Action-221 Create rdf vocab for dqv) Eric Stephan
• Re: And for DUV (was Re: Action-221 Create rdf vocab for dqv) Eric Stephan
• Re: Action-221 Create rdf vocab for dqv Antoine Isaac

Thursday, 10 December 2015

• Re: BP15- A proposal for Example 15 Antoine Isaac
• [off topic] APIs and government transparency Yasodara
• Re: Best Practices about Rest APIs Yasodara
• Re: BP15- A proposal for Example 15 Ghislain Atemezing
• Re: BP15- A proposal for Example 15 Ghislain Atemezing
• Re: BP15- A proposal for Example 15 Antoine Isaac
• Re: BP15- A proposal for Example 15 Antoine Isaac
• Re: Minor tweaks to DUV doc Phil Archer
• Re: Minor tweaks to DUV doc Riccardo Albertoni
• Re: Minor tweaks to DUV doc Bernadette Farias Lóscio
• Minor tweaks to DUV doc Phil Archer
• Re: And for DUV (was Re: Action-221 Create rdf vocab for dqv) Eric Stephan

Wednesday, 9 December 2015

• Voting documents call - next Friday Yasodara
• Re: Action-221 Create rdf vocab for dqv Riccardo Albertoni
• And for DUV (was Re: Action-221 Create rdf vocab for dqv) Phil Archer
• Re: Action-221 Create rdf vocab for dqv Ghislain Atemezing
• Action-221 Create rdf vocab for dqv Phil Archer

Tuesday, 8 December 2015

• Re: Best Practices about Rest APIs Herbert Van de Sompel
• Best Practices about Rest APIs Yasodara
• Re: BP15- A proposal for Example 15 Ghislain Atemezing
• 3rd draft DWBP document - Feedback welcome before voting Bernadette Farias Lóscio
• Re: BP15- A proposal for Example 15 Bernadette Farias Lóscio
• dwbp-ISSUE-230: Should we consider other BP benefits? [Best practices document(s)] Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• dwbp-ISSUE-229: Review requirements x BP [Best practices document(s)] Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• dwbp-ISSUE-228: Should we include definitions on the glossary to explain other terms used in the Contextsection? [Best practices document(s)] Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• dwbp-ISSUE-227: The document has three different indexes for the BP: by challenges, by benefits and the summary. Should we keep the three of them? [Best practices document(s)] Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• dwbp-ISSUE-226: Should we remove the Reuse benefit? [Best practices document(s)] Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• BP15- A proposal for Example 15 Ghislain Atemezing
• Re: Automated benefits list (was Re: Some more examples done) Phil Archer
• Re: Automated benefits list (was Re: Some more examples done) Phil Archer
• Re: Automated benefits list (was Re: Some more examples done) Laufer
• Re: Automated benefits list (was Re: Some more examples done) Bernadette Farias Lóscio

Monday, 7 December 2015

• Re: dwbp-ISSUE-222: Multiple/Derived values of a metric [Quality & Granularity Vocabulary] Annette Greiner
• Re: dwbp-ISSUE-225: Levels of granularity for dimensions and categories [Quality & Granularity Vocabulary] Annette Greiner
• Automated benefits list (was Re: Some more examples done) Phil Archer

Sunday, 6 December 2015

• dwbp-ISSUE-225: Levels of granularity for dimensions and categories [Quality & Granularity Vocabulary] Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• dwbp-ISSUE-224: Multiple/Derived values of a metric [Quality & Granularity Vocabulary] Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• dwbp-ISSUE-223: Multiple/Derived values of a metric [Quality & Granularity Vocabulary] Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• dwbp-ISSUE-222: Multiple/Derived values of a metric [Quality & Granularity Vocabulary] Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker

Saturday, 5 December 2015

• Re: Alignment between DWBP vocabularies and HCLS profile Michel Dumontier

Friday, 4 December 2015

• Re: Alignment between DWBP vocabularies and HCLS profile Antoine Isaac
• Re: DQV, ISO 19115/19157 and GeoDCAT-AP Antoine Isaac
• Re: Alignment between DWBP vocabularies and HCLS profile Michel Dumontier
• Alignment between DWBP vocabularies and HCLS profile Antoine Isaac
• dwbp-ACTION-223: Contact michel dumontier about issue-221 Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-221: What is the importance of the alignment between hcls-dataset and dqv? Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• dwbp-ACTION-222: Will create an rdf vocab (dqv) and put on github Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• dwbp-ACTION-221: Create rdf vocab for dqv Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• dwbp-ACTION-220: Reach out with giancarlo about the http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/actions/202 Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: Some more examples done Phil Archer
• Re: Some more examples done Newton Calegari
• Re: Feedback about BP Benefits - DWBP document Bernadette Farias Lóscio
• Re: Feedback about BP Benefits - DWBP document Laufer
• Re: dwbp-ISSUE-213 (BP_REST): Changes on BP about REST APIs [Best practices document(s)] Bernadette Farias Lóscio
• Re: dwbp-ISSUE-213 (BP_REST): Changes on BP about REST APIs [Best practices document(s)] Yasodara
• Re: dwbp-ISSUE-213 (BP_REST): Changes on BP about REST APIs [Best practices document(s)] Bernadette Farias Lóscio
• Re: dwbp-ISSUE-213 (BP_REST): Changes on BP about REST APIs [Best practices document(s)] Yasodara
• Re: Agenda for the next call (04/12/2015) - the last before the voting call (11/12/15)! Caroline Burle

Thursday, 3 December 2015

• Re: issue-202: asserting the dataset's metadata conforms to certain standards Antoine Isaac
• Re: Some more examples done Bernadette Farias Lóscio
• Some more examples done Phil Archer
• dwbp-ISSUE-220: Should we include a more complexe example to illustrate provenance? [Best practices document(s)] Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker

Wednesday, 2 December 2015

• Re: Agenda for the next call (04/12/2015) - the last before the voting call (11/12/15)! Eric Stephan
• Feedback about BP Benefits - DWBP document Bernadette Farias Lóscio
• Agenda for the next call (04/12/2015) - the last before the voting call (11/12/15)! Yasodara

Last message date: Tuesday, 22 December 2015 09:06:40 UTC