Re: Editing Requirements From FPWD BP Wiki Page

Sorry, forgot to attach the link for [1] http://events.linkeddata.org/ldow2011/papers/ldow2011-paper01-sacco.pdf

On 20 Apr 2015, at 11:02, Jeremy Debattista <jeremy.debattista@iais.fraunhofer.de<mailto:jeremy.debattista@iais.fraunhofer.de>> wrote:

Hi Antoine,

I went through the quality documents, and there is almost nothing left to contribute! I think that most issues I can think of have been discussed.

I have two comments regarding sensitive data and Issue 116, which I would like to share with you.

With regard to issue 116, i tend to agree on having quality metadata graphs (well expected from me :)), which could be either part of the dataset or in a separate file that could be found/crawled by robots. On the other hand each dataset should have a simple link (triple in case of LD) to this metadata graph. Maybe they should also be added in site maps (if they are still used).

The sensitive data issue is something which should not be taken lightly. From my experience with data publishers in the DIACHRON project, there are companies which are making money from clients by publishing their raw data into “Linked Open Data”, BUT they (more specific the data publishers) do not want that quality information is distributed freely. They would like to get data quality information to improve their processes (especially if it comes for free), but they don’t want it freely published for obvious reasons. I was discussing with our project partners what might be a possible solution, and the most plausible one was to use privacy mechanisms such as [1]. I tried convincing them that it is stupid because they are publishing “Open Data”, but I can understand that when it comes down to money, openness is a grey area.


Cheers,
Jer



On 18 Apr 2015, at 12:23, Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl<mailto:aisaac@few.vu.nl>> wrote:

Hi Jeremy,

Thanks for your willingness to contribute!
It's fine if you directly edit wiki pages or send email, as you see fit. Two caveats though:

- please keep Christophe, Riccardo and Deirdre in the look if you have significant questions or suggestions. I'm not the only one working on this

- the page you mention is meant to capture requirements from the Best Practices document. There is another wiki page for requirements from the Use Case and Requirement document [1]. If you were  about to add requirements that are based on the state-of-the-art or your own work in DaQ, then it could be on another page. We have a parent page for all quality work at [2]. Maybe your new stuff could fit an entirely different page. It depends on what you wanted to say :-)

Cheers,

Antoine

[1] https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/Quality_Requirements_From_UCR
[2] https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/Data_quality_notes

On 4/17/15 7:14 PM, Debattista, Jeremy wrote:
Hi Antoine,

Is it ok for me to edit the requirements in the wikipage [1], or shall I send you my thoughts if I have any? I will be going through the requirements this weekend.

Sorry for my late feedback, but I was very busy lately.

Cheers,
Jeremy



[1] https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/Requirements_From_FPWD_BP