RE: dwbp-ACTION-160: Write a bp on preservation in bp doc

I think this is out of scope. That's how an archive should behave, it's
very interesting for DANS and other digital trusted repositories but not in
scope for our work.

Christophe

--
Sent with difficulties. Sorry for the brievety and typos...
Op 14 apr. 2015 15:57 schreef "Manuel.CARRASCO-BENITEZ@ec.europa.eu" <
Manuel.CARRASCO-BENITEZ@ec.europa.eu>:

> Again, the in scope must be clearly specified - out should take into
> account the previous work such as in LTANS
>
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4810
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker [mailto:
> sysbot+tracker@w3.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2015 3:38 PM
> To: public-dwbp-wg@w3.org
> Subject: dwbp-ACTION-160: Write a bp on preservation in bp doc
>
> dwbp-ACTION-160: Write a bp on preservation in bp doc
>
> http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/actions/160
>
> Assigned to: Christophe Gueret
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>