- From: Carlos Iglesias <contact@carlosiglesias.es>
- Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2015 11:22:31 +0200
- To: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
- Cc: Public DWBP WG <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAAa1XzmZFWpcOXQp9riZ8D_zvEeH-mA=ErwjwJXb1m9Fa7V6Ng@mail.gmail.com>
Good. I'm adding also the Dataset Quality Vocabulary (daQ) as a reference as well http://butterbur04.iai.uni-bonn.de/ontologies/daq/daq Best, CI. On 4 April 2015 at 18:37, Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl> wrote: > Hi Carlos, > > Thanks a lot for the links! > I've been collecting a list at > https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/Data_quality_notes#Links.2C_related_work > I've added your ones that were not there (all but one!) > > We should certainly study all this at one point. > For the moment however we'd like to give it a try to define quality by our > own use cases and best practices. Especially for defining what is in scope > or not. > There is indeed a lot of related work, mostly academic, and this could end > in trying to tackle many things, some perhaps less important than others. > > Cheers, > > Antoine > > PS: @Carlos sorry I won't have time to answer on the other (BP/vocabulary) > thread very soon... > > On 4/4/15 3:37 AM, Carlos Iglesias wrote: > >> Hi Antoine, all, >> >> I think there is extensive literature on the different data quality >> characteristics that may be useful here as well. >> Some examples are: >> >> - Data quality under the computer science perspective >> http://www.academia.edu/2746633/Data_quality_under_the_computer_science_ >> perspective >> >> - Data quality at a glance >> http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1. >> 106.8628&rep=rep1&type=pdf >> >> - A metrics-driven approach for quality assessment of LOD >> http://www.scielo.cl/pdf/jtaer/v9n2/art06.pdf >> >> - Socio-technical impediments of Open Data >> http://www.ejeg.com/issue/download.html?idArticle=255 >> >> - Risk Analysis to Overcome Barriers to Open Data >> http://www.ejeg.com/issue/download.html?idArticle=296 >> >> - Quality Assessment Methodologies for Linked Open Data >> http://www.semantic-web-journal.net/system/files/swj414.pdf >> >> As well as other authoritative resources we may consider as well such as: >> >> - The Sebastopol principles >> https://public.resource.org/8_principles.html >> >> - ISO 8000 Data quality series. >> >> -- ISO 25012 Data quality model. >> >> Hope it helps. >> Best, >> CI. >> >> On 3 April 2015 at 18:42, Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl <mailto: >> aisaac@few.vu.nl>> wrote: >> >> Dear all, >> >> One week has passed since our previous report. The same situation is >> roughly the same. Since there was no reaction to my previous email I'm >> trying a different format. >> >> We analyzed Q&G aspects in the Use Cases and Requirements FPWD: >> - assessing which requirements should be in scope for the Q&G work [1] >> - extracting the relevant Q&G stuff from the descriptions of Use >> Cases [2] >> >> The outcome is that use cases have very diverse views on quality. >> There are two main issues for scoping the voc: >> >> 1. Focusing on expressing metrics for data quality >> VS. >> Also expressing compliance of dataset wrt Best practices. from our BP >> WD. >> >> 2. Focusing on a general framework to express metrics for data >> quality and exchange results along specific quality dimensions >> VS. >> Defining specific metrics with such framework. >> >> >> Meanwhile, we have started extracting requirements from the best >> practices [3] >> >> This includes identifying 'competency questions' guiding us to add >> classes and properties in the voc. >> >> In general we feel we don't have much material to continue our work. >> In fact most of the competency questions come from Riccardo, not from >> the best practices in the WD. >> >> One option is to ask use case owners more precise questions. We >> started a questionnaire [4]. >> >> What is the group's reaction on this? >> Can this be discussed at the F2F? >> >> I am afraid that without further input it will be hard to keep to our >> schedule [5], which is already very late compared to the charter. >> >> Antoine, on behalf of Riccardo, Deirdre and Christophe. >> >> [1] https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/__wiki/Requirements_In_Scope___ >> For_Quality <https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/Requirements_In_Scope_ >> For_Quality> >> [2] https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/__wiki/Quality_Aspects_In_Use__ >> _Cases <https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/Quality_Aspects_In_Use_Cases> >> [3] https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/__wiki/Requirements_From_FPWD_BP < >> https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/Requirements_From_FPWD_BP> >> [4] https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/__wiki/QualityQuestionnaire < >> https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/QualityQuestionnaire> >> [5] https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/__wiki/Data_quality_schedule < >> https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/Data_quality_schedule> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> --- >> >> Carlos Iglesias. >> Open Data Consultant. >> +34 687 917 759 >> contact@carlosiglesias.es <mailto:contact@carlosiglesias.es> >> @carlosiglesias >> http://es.linkedin.com/in/carlosiglesiasmoro/en >> > > -- --- Carlos Iglesias. Internet & Web Consultant. +34 687 917 759 contact@carlosiglesias.es @carlosiglesias http://es.linkedin.com/in/carlosiglesiasmoro/en
Received on Monday, 6 April 2015 09:23:00 UTC