Re: [dwbp] Suggestions to solve the 144 issue (#117)

Sorry, forgot this one:


> On the term 'vocabularies' - I think Antoine answered Carlos well but I'd
> be happy with some sort of expansion, such as:
>
> Data Vocabularies
> How can existing terms, vocabularies and data models be used to provide
> semantic interoperability?
> How can a new vocabulary be designed if needed?
>

For me such an expansion would be a good approach if fully adopted as
following:

- Data Vocabularies and data models
- How can existing terms, vocabularies and data models be used to provide
semantic interoperability?
- How can a new vocabulary or data model be designed if needed?

On the other hand, and more important, I wonder whether we all have the
same understanding of what a "vocabulary" may be. For example:

HL7, UBL, XBRL, SDMX, KML, OCDS...

Phil, Antoine:

- Are all these data vocabularies for you?
- Are all these "valid" data models for publishing data on the web for you?
- From your perspective, do all "valid" data vocabularies or data models
need to fulfil the LD Vocabulary creation BPs?
http://www.w3.org/TR/ld-bp/#vocabulary-creation