Thursday, 30 April 2015
- Re: RDESC Use Case presentation this week...
- RDESC Use Case presentation this week...
- RE: Thought for URI section
- Thought for URI section
- Re: Acknowledgements to W3C and DWBP...?
- Re: Acknowledgements to W3C and DWBP...?
- Re: Acknowledgements to W3C and DWBP...?
- Re: Acknowledgements to W3C and DWBP...?
- Re: Acknowledgements to W3C and DWBP...?
- Acknowledgements to W3C and DWBP...?
Wednesday, 29 April 2015
- Re: [DUV] A sample in Turtle to understand the model from data.gouv.fr
- Re: second F2F dates
- second F2F dates
- Re: [DUV] A sample in Turtle to understand the model from data.gouv.fr
- [DUV] A sample in Turtle to understand the model from data.gouv.fr
Tuesday, 28 April 2015
- Re: Apache CommonsRDF
- Re: DBpedia - Usage Example
- Re: DBpedia - Usage Example
- Re: DBpedia - Usage Example
- RE: "machine readable"
- Re: "machine readable"
- RE: DBpedia - Usage Example
- RE: "machine readable"
- Re: Glossary defn of dataset, metadata
Monday, 27 April 2015
- Status on Action-85
- Status on Action-122
- Re: Status on Action-131
- Status on Action-131
- Status on Action-162
- Status on Action-157
- Status on Action-160
- Status on Action-166; Action-164; Action-162
- Status on Action-173
- Re: Glossary defn of dataset, metadata
- Re: "machine readable"
- Re: Glossary defn of dataset, metadata
- Re: DBpedia - Usage Example
- Re: Glossary defn of dataset, metadata
- Re: DBpedia - Usage Example
- Re: "machine readable"
- Re: DBpedia - Usage Example
- Re: DBpedia - Usage Example
- Re: DBpedia - Usage Example
- Re: "machine readable"
- Re: "machine readable"
- Re: Glossary defn of dataset, metadata
- Re: ODI Open Data Maturity Model
Sunday, 26 April 2015
- Re: dwbp-ACTION-159: Write a definition of archiving (and preservation) in the glossary (again!)
- Re: "machine readable"
Saturday, 25 April 2015
- Re: "machine readable"
- Re: "machine readable"
- Re: "machine readable"
- Re: More feedback on DQV
- Re: "machine readable"
- Re: Glossary defn of dataset, metadata
- Re: DBpedia - Usage Example
Friday, 24 April 2015
- DBpedia - Usage Example
- Re: Status on Action-174 ?
- Re: Glossary defn of dataset, metadata
- Re: Glossary defn of dataset, metadata
- Re: "machine readable"
- Re: "machine readable"
- Re: Glossary defn of dataset, metadata
- Re: Please keep DWBP wiki up-to-date
- ODI Open Data Maturity Model
- Re: Status on Action-174 ?
- Re: Status on Action-174 ?
- Re: Please keep DWBP wiki up-to-date
- Please keep DWBP wiki up-to-date
- Re: Status on Action-174 ?
- "machine readable"
- Re: Status on Action-174 ?
- Re: Status on Action-174 ?
- Re: Status on Action-174 ?
- Re: Status on Action-174 ?
- Re: Glossary defn of dataset, metadata
- Glossary defn of dataset, metadata
- Fwd: Re: Quick comments on DQV after F2F meeting.
- Fwd: Re: Quick comments on DQV after F2F meeting.
- Fwd: Re: Quick comments on DQV after F2F meeting.
- Fwd: Re: Quick comments on DQV after F2F meeting.
- Fwd: Re: Quick comments on DQV after F2F meeting.
- Fwd: Re: Quick comments on DQV after F2F meeting.
- Fwd: Re: Quick comments on DQV after F2F meeting.
- Fwd: Quick comments on DQV after F2F meeting.
- Re: Editing Requirements From FPWD BP Wiki Page
- Re: Status on Action-174 ?
Thursday, 23 April 2015
- Re: Status on Action-174 ?
- Re: Status on Action-174 ?
- [DWBP] Close Action-121
- Re: Status on Action-174 ?
- Re: Action-177 assigned to you....
- Re: Action-177 assigned to you....
- Agenda for tomorrow's telco
- Re: Action-177 assigned to you....
- Re: Status on Action-174 ?
- Status on Action-174 ?
- Action-177 assigned to you....
- Re: Editable version of DUV model Action-178
- Re: Editable version of DUV model Action-178
- Re: Editable version of DUV model Action-178
- Re: Editable version of DUV model Action-178
- Re: Editable version of DUV model Action-178
Wednesday, 22 April 2015
- Re: Editable version of DUV model Action-178
- Re: F2F Meeting Post Mortem
- Re: Editable version of DUV model Action-178
- Re: Editable version of DUV model Action-178
- Re: Editable version of DUV model Action-178
- Re: Editable version of DUV model Action-178
- Re: Editable version of DUV model
- Re: Editable version of DUV model Action-178
- Re: Editable version of DUV model Action-178
- Re: Editable version of DUV model Action-178
- Re: Editable version of DUV model Action-178
- Editable version of DUV model
Tuesday, 21 April 2015
Monday, 20 April 2015
Sunday, 19 April 2015
Saturday, 18 April 2015
- Action-176 update general citations.
- Re: Who is the Dataset?
- Who is the Dataset?
- Re: Brainstorming data quality needs within the Dataset Usage Vocabulary.
- Re: Brainstorming data quality needs within the Dataset Usage Vocabulary.
- Re: Brainstorming data quality needs within the Dataset Usage Vocabulary.
Friday, 17 April 2015
- Action-176 Comments from Annette G.
- Weathering the Future: Forecasting Economic Risk with Open Data
- Re: dwbp-ACTION-180: Follow up with Laufer on Semantically-Interlinked Online Communities
- Dataset reuse
- Re: Brainstorming data quality needs within the Dataset Usage Vocabulary.
- Re: Am I the only one having problem with the irc.w3.org?
- Am I the only one having problem with the irc.w3.org?
- Re: Brainstorming data quality needs within the Dataset Usage Vocabulary.
- Re: Brainstorming data quality needs within the Dataset Usage Vocabulary.
- Re: Brainstorming data quality needs within the Dataset Usage Vocabulary.
- Re: Brainstorming data quality needs within the Dataset Usage Vocabulary.
- Re: dwbp-ACTION-180: Follow up with Laufer on Semantically-Interlinked Online Communities
- Meeting today — still on!
- Re: Dataset Usage Vocab Activities
- Dataset Usage Vocab Activities
- Re: dwbp-ACTION-180: Follow up with Laufer on Semantically-Interlinked Online Communities
Thursday, 16 April 2015
- just stumbled upon a couple notes on data quality
- dwbp-ACTION-180: Follow up with Laufer on Semantically-Interlinked Online Communities
- Re: Brainstorming data quality needs within the Dataset Usage Vocabulary.
- Re: dwbp-ACTION-180: Follow up with Laufer on Semantically-Interlinked Online Communities
- Re: dwbp-ACTION-180: Follow up with Laufer on Semantically-Interlinked Online Communities
- Re: dwbp-ACTION-180: Follow up with Laufer on Semantically-Interlinked Online Communities
- Re: dwbp-ACTION-180: Follow up with Laufer on Semantically-Interlinked Online Communities
- Re: dwbp-ACTION-180: Follow up with Laufer on Semantically-Interlinked Online Communities
- Re: Brainstorming data quality needs within the Dataset Usage Vocabulary.
- Brainstorming data quality needs within the Dataset Usage Vocabulary.
- Re: dwbp-ACTION-180: Follow up with Laufer on Semantically-Interlinked Online Communities
- Re: dwbp-ACTION-180: Follow up with Laufer on Semantically-Interlinked Online Communities
- Re: Dataset Usage Vocabulary Team
- Re: Dataset Usage Vocabulary Team
- Re: Dataset Usage Vocabulary Team
- Re: F2F Meeting Post Mortem
Wednesday, 15 April 2015
- Re: F2F Meeting Post Mortem
- Re: F2F Meeting Post Mortem
- F2F Meeting Post Mortem
- dwbp-ACTION-180: Follow up with Laufer on Semantically-Interlinked Online Communities
- Dataset Usage Vocabulary Team
- dwbp-ACTION-179: Identifying Mechanisms Dataset Usage Vocabulary
- dwbp-ACTION-178: Update Dataset Usage Vocabulary Model
- dwbp-ACTION-177: Putting Dataset Usage Vocabulary in Github
- dwbp-ACTION-176: Incorporating citations in Dataset Usage Vocabulary
Tuesday, 14 April 2015
- dwbp-ACTION-175: Read the citation section on the "dataset descriptions: hcls community profile" document
- dwbp-ACTION-174: Make update to glossary for new data usage terms: citations, data producer, consumer, publisher etc
- dwbp-ACTION-173: Create bp for data enrichment
- Re: Missing you guys in Austin
- Re: dwbp-ACTION-161: Write bp on topic of what happens to identifiers after data resource is no longer online (e.g. through archiving). wg will then decide if this should be included in bp doc, and if it is, should it be separate bp or merged with ...
- Re: Missing you guys in Austin
- Re: dwbp-ACTION-172: to add all public comments to comment tracker
- dwbp-ACTION-171: to add all public comments to comment tracker
- dwbp-ACTION-172: to add all public comments to comment tracker
- dwbp-ACTION-170: Create a "possible approach to implementation" showing memento examples
- dwbp-ACTION-169: Create a "possible approach to implementation" showing memento examples
- dwbp-ACTION-167: Ensure that the dqv document includes slas as a possible method for expressing quality
- dwbp-ACTION-168: Ensure that the dqv document includes slas as a possible method for expressing quality
- dwbp-ACTION-166: Work with dee to propose alternative text for http://bernafarias.github.io/dwbp/bp.html#preserveprivacy
- dwbp-ACTION-165: Work with dee to propose alternative text for http://bernafarias.github.io/dwbp/bp.html#preserveprivacy
- dwbp-ACTION-163: Work with phil to propose text to replace http://bernafarias.github.io/dwbp/bp.html#preserveprivacy
- dwbp-ACTION-164: Work with phil to propose text to replace http://bernafarias.github.io/dwbp/bp.html#preserveprivacy
- RE: dwbp-ACTION-161: Write bp on topic of what happens to identifiers after data resource is no longer online (e.g. through archiving). wg will then decide if this should be included in bp doc, and if it is, should it be separate bp or merged with ...
- Web data preservation
- Re: dwbp-ACTION-161: Write bp on topic of what happens to identifiers after data resource is no longer online (e.g. through archiving). wg will then decide if this should be included in bp doc, and if it is, should it be separate bp or merged with another bp
- dwbp-ACTION-162: Write bp on topic of what happens to identifiers after data resource is no longer online (e.g. through archiving). wg will then decide if this should be included in bp doc, and if it is, should it be separate bp or merged with another bp
- dwbp-ACTION-161: Write bp on topic of what happens to identifiers after data resource is no longer online (e.g. through archiving). wg will then decide if this should be included in bp doc, and if it is, should it be separate bp or merged with another bp
- RE: dwbp-ACTION-160: Write a bp on preservation in bp doc
- Re: dwbp-ACTION-160: Write a bp on preservation in bp doc
- Re: dwbp-ACTION-158: Add preservtion text to scope
- RE: dwbp-ACTION-160: Write a bp on preservation in bp doc
- RE: dwbp-ACTION-159: Write a definition of archiving (and preservation) in the glossary (again!)
- RE: dwbp-ACTION-158: Add preservtion text to scope
- RE: ISSUE-163: Should the bp document refer to uris or identifiers
- dwbp-ACTION-160: Write a bp on preservation in bp doc
- dwbp-ACTION-159: Write a definition of archiving (and preservation) in the glossary (again!)
- dwbp-ACTION-158: Add preservtion text to scope
- ISSUE-163: Should the bp document refer to uris or identifiers
- dwbp-ISSUE-162:
- ISSUE-161: Whether we should recommend https by default, rather than http
- dwbp-ACTION-157: Work with hadleybeeman to revise the bp on http://www.w3.org/tr/dwbp/#provideuniqueidentifiers and make new suggestions
- dwbp-ACTION-156: Change should to must in http://www.w3.org/tr/dwbp-ucr/#r-sensitiveprivacy
- dwbp-ACTION-155: Write to danbri in response to comment 3006
- Re: Missing you guys in Austin
- Re: Missing you guys in Austin
Monday, 13 April 2015
Tuesday, 14 April 2015
Monday, 13 April 2015
- dwbp-ACTION-153: Look at completeness as one of the quality dimensions
- Re: {Possible Spam} Austin team got lunch served a little late
- Austin team got lunch served a little late
- dwbp-ACTION-152: Follow up on the resolution re starting with the ods list, makx's list etc, working towards fpwd asap
- dwbp-ACTION-151: Follow up on resolution that phil proposed
- dwbp-ACTION-150: Write to andrea perego informing of the new text
- dwbp-ACTION-149: Include the standard resolution in the scope page on the wiki
- dwbp-ACTION-148: Include a definition of 'a standard' in the glossary
- dwbp-ACTION-147: to add a bp for structural metadata
- Our Austin setup
- We are setting up in Austin...
- Monday Morning in Austin
- File format
- a couple suggested BPs
- dwbp-ISSUE-160 (annette_g): Should we add at BP about subsetting data? [Best practices document(s)]
Sunday, 12 April 2015
- new version of DWBP document
- draft DUV google doc on agenda
- Re: dwbp-ISSUE-159 (Eric Stephan): Is R-QualityOpinions more of a Data Usage Vocabulary concept? [Data Usage Vocabulary]
- Re: dwbp-ISSUE-159 (Eric Stephan): Is R-QualityOpinions more of a Data Usage Vocabulary concept? [Data Usage Vocabulary]
- Re: dwbp-ISSUE-159 (Eric Stephan): Is R-QualityOpinions more of a Data Usage Vocabulary concept? [Data Usage Vocabulary]
- Re: dwbp-ISSUE-159 (Eric Stephan): Is R-QualityOpinions more of a Data Usage Vocabulary concept? [Data Usage Vocabulary]
- dwbp-ISSUE-159 (Eric Stephan): Is R-QualityOpinions more of a Data Usage Vocabulary concept? [Data Usage Vocabulary]
Saturday, 11 April 2015
Friday, 10 April 2015
- dwbp-ISSUE-158 (Eric Stephan): Modeling R-Citable in vocabulary [Data Usage Vocabulary]
- dwbp-ISSUE-157 (Eric Stephan): Considering other kinds of data usage [Data Usage Vocabulary]
- dwbp-ACTION-146: Examine Different Aspects of Feedback
- dwbp-ISSUE-156 (Eric Stephan): Protocol for referring to related efforts [Data Usage Vocabulary]
- dwbp-ISSUE-155 (Eric Stephan): Target audience for vocabulary [Data Usage Vocabulary]
- dwbp-ISSUE-154 (Eric Stephan): Handling data usage references to collection of datasets [Data Usage Vocabulary]
- dwbp-ISSUE-153 (Eric Stephan): Should open/closed data be addressed in the Data Usage Vocabulary? [Data Usage Vocabulary]
- action-122: Tests description for BP
- dwbp-ISSUE-152 (annette_g): Should we add a data enrichment BP? [Best practices document(s)]
- ISSUE-151: Debating about the insertion of the data enrichment work of inweb (ufmg) on the deliverables of the wg
- ISSUE-150: Decide how examples are included in bp doc
- Re: Action-115 Investigate how wcag can be an example for our bp document
Thursday, 9 April 2015
- Re: Data Q&G vocabulary - report and questions for F2F
- Re: Agenda for tomorrow's meeting - final one before F2F!!
- Agenda for tomorrow's meeting - final one before F2F!!
- dwbp-ISSUE-149: How to handle metadata that is embedded in the document? [Best practices document(s)]
- Re: ACTION-128: Bring out the versioning issues in his use case (ref issue 69)
Wednesday, 8 April 2015
- Re: Action-115 Investigate how wcag can be an example for our bp document
- Re: Action-115 Investigate how wcag can be an example for our bp document
- ACTION-103: Re: Let's close the following actions before F2F!
- ACTION-71: Re: Let's close the following actions before F2F!
- Re: Action-115 Investigate how wcag can be an example for our bp document
- Re: Let's close the following actions before F2F!
- Re: Let's close the following actions before F2F!
- Re: Action-76 Create a template for data usage status
- Re: Action-119 (was Re: Let's close the following actions before F2F!)
- Re: Let's close the following actions before F2F!
- ACTION-128: Bring out the versioning issues in his use case (ref issue 69)
- Re: Let's close the following actions before F2F!
- Action-115 Investigate how wcag can be an example for our bp document
- Action-76 Create a template for data usage status
- Action-119 (was Re: Let's close the following actions before F2F!)
Tuesday, 7 April 2015
- Proposal to close Issues-65 and 66, no need to gather new use-cases
- Let's close the following actions before F2F!
- RE: Data Q&G vocabulary - report and questions for F2F
- Re: Data Q&G vocabulary - report and questions for F2F
Monday, 6 April 2015
Saturday, 4 April 2015
- Re: Data Q&G vocabulary - report and questions for F2F
- Capturing the discussion (was Re: NY Property Tax Explorer)
- RE: Capturing the discussion (was Re: NY Property Tax Explorer)
- RE: Capturing the discussion (was Re: NY Property Tax Explorer)
- Re: NY Property Tax Explorer
- Re: Meaning of publishing Data on the Web
- Re: Data Q&G vocabulary - report and questions for F2F
- Re: Meaning of publishing Data on the Web
- Re: Meaning of publishing Data on the Web
- Re: NY Property Tax Explorer
- Re: [dwbp] Suggestions to solve the 144 issue (#117)
- Re: [dwbp] Suggestions to solve the 144 issue (#117)
Friday, 3 April 2015
- Re: Data Q&G vocabulary - report and questions for F2F
- Data Q&G vocabulary - report and questions for F2F
Thursday, 2 April 2015
- Re: [dwbp] Suggestions to solve the 144 issue (#117)
- Re: [dwbp] Suggestions to solve the 144 issue (#117)
- Re: [dwbp] Suggestions to solve the 144 issue (#117)
- FW: DCMI Webinar - Approaches to Making Dynamic Data Citable: Recommendations of the RDA Working Group