- From: Laufer <laufer@globo.com>
- Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 13:16:37 -0300
- To: "manuel.carrasco-benitez" <Manuel.CARRASCO-BENITEZ@ec.europa.eu>
- Cc: DWBP WG <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>
Received on Monday, 29 September 2014 16:17:05 UTC
Ok, Tomas. Regards, Laufer 2014-09-29 11:54 GMT-03:00 <Manuel.CARRASCO-BENITEZ@ec.europa.eu>: > Laufer, > > I like opaque URIs with salt and pepper: compact mnemonic URIs :-) > > Regards > Tomas > > From: Laufer [mailto:laufer@globo.com] > Sent: Sunday, September 28, 2014 7:21 PM > To: DWBP WG > Subject: Re: COMURI > > Hi Tomas, Hi all, > I think that this is an issue that has already been discussed a lot of > times by the community. Pros and Cons. > Like others in the group, I also prefer opaque URIs. > Thank you. > Best Regards. > Laufer > > 2014-09-28 13:09 GMT-03:00 Makx Dekkers <mail@makxdekkers.com>: > Tomas, > > > > > > > * Human and machine > > URIs *must* be human and machine friendly: it is good for both. > > > > The reality today is that humans {developers are also humans :-)} type > > a lot of URIs and IP addresses :-) > > > > And human readbility is money: look at the prices of some domains :-) > > > > You are right about domain names, but it is my experience that > practically no-one types in anything more than domain+TLD in a browser > and most people don't even do that. And are you serious about typing in > IP addresses? > > Makx. > > > > > > > -- > . . . .. . . > . . . .. > . .. . > -- . . . .. . . . . . .. . .. .
Received on Monday, 29 September 2014 16:17:05 UTC