- From: Carlos Iglesias <carlos.iglesias.moro@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2014 15:08:53 +0200
- To: Manuel Tomas Carrasco-Benitez <Manuel.CARRASCO-BENITEZ@ec.europa.eu>
- Cc: Public DWBP WG <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAAa1Xzn5vcnr+JJfY4oBqsUEkkm=v8FO+ewqQCnvf2NGBoEEsQ@mail.gmail.com>
Hello everyone, After the detailed work from Manuel and the thorough reviews from other team members, before going into any further detailed review I would like also to call your attention to some sort of general issue I see with the document. The main question here for me is that the purpose of the document may not be really clear. The document starts with a "comuris" definition, but I don't see where the connection with data on the web is made there or elsewhere or how several of the recommendations that are being made throughout the document are applicable. Personally, I was expecting something more in the lines of guidelines or best practices when it comes to the definition of identification schemes (ie URI schemes in the case of the Web), but here we are even we made some recommendations in the opposite direction e.g. "Comuri avoids cluttering with metadata, taxonomy, semantics and similar... The amount of metadata that can be encoded into a URI is limited before the URI becomes too cumbersome: a better approach is to get the metadata in human and machine readable format." or when we talk about "data archival" in opposition to persistence. Also, given that the document introduces so many new terms and definitions, it is somehow difficult to follow and understand. Even sometimes it looks like we are trying to "redefine" other well-stablished concepts ("rewriting of existing terms" is explicitly mentioned) such as in the case of "direct identification" that looks pretty similar if not the same as "content negotiation". Another relevant issue may be also that Short-URIs are an interesting concept themselves, but likely to be not much compatible with a vast majority of current content management systems in the Web. As Makx said we shouldn't forget URIs are for machines (and developers) first and very few humans care about them. All the above, my impression is that it may be worth to invest some more time discussing on the overall approach before getting into some other details. Best, CI. --- Carlos Iglesias. Open Data Consultant. +34 687 917 759 contact@carlosiglesias.es @carlosiglesias http://es.linkedin.com/in/carlosiglesiasmoro/en On 18 September 2014 15:48, <Manuel.CARRASCO-BENITEZ@ec.europa.eu> wrote: > Dear WG members, > > Please could you comment on > Compact Uniform Resource Identifier (COMURI) > http://dragoman.org/comuri > mirror - https://joinup.ec.europa.eu/site/med/dragoman/comuri > > It is nearly completed and as per the calendar, the First Public Working > Draft is planned by the 30 Sep > http://www.w3.org/2013/meeting/dwbp/2014-08-22#URI_construction > > The language in the final version will be corrected by a proof-reader. > > Regards > Tomas > > > -- --- Carlos Iglesias. Internet & Web Consultant. +34 687 917 759 contact@carlosiglesias.es @carlosiglesias http://es.linkedin.com/in/carlosiglesiasmoro/en
Received on Friday, 26 September 2014 13:09:26 UTC