Re: W3C DWBP: Request to close Issue 38

> Hmm, measuring usage of data that hasn’t been published yet sounds
> difficult ;-)
>
> Indeed :-)


>
>
> Alternative:
>
>
>
> “Priority should be given to publishing data for which there is high
> demand or for which high usage can be expected.”
>
> +1!


>
>
> Makx.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Christophe Guéret [mailto:christophe.gueret@dans.knaw.nl]
> *Sent:* Thursday, September 25, 2014 1:56 PM
> *To:* Lee, Deirdre
> *Cc:* public-dwbp-wg@w3.org; Bernadette Farias Lóscio; Makx Dekkers
> *Subject:* Re: W3C DWBP: Request to close Issue 38
>
>
>
> Hoi,
>
> My take on this is the the value of a data is best assessed by its amount
> of usage. If many users use a given dataset or are asking for it, it can be
> considered to be of high value.
>
> I'd thus suggest to merge the two requirements into one that reads
> "Priority should be given to publishing datasets highly demanded, or used,
> by target users".
>
> Christophe
>
>
>
> On 25 September 2014 00:21, Lee, Deirdre <Deirdre.Lee@deri.org> wrote:
>
> Too many questions remain here, so reopening this issue. What does
> everyone think about these current requirements:
>
> ·         R-SelectHighValue
>
> ·         R-SelectDemand
>
>
>
> Bernadette, in connection to UC#3, what do you think?
>
>
>
> Issue: https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/38
>
>
>
> *From:* Makx Dekkers [mailto:makx@makxdekkers.com]
> *Sent:* 20 September 2014 20:54
> *To:* Lee, Deirdre
> *Cc:* 'Bernadette Farias Lóscio'
> *Subject:* RE: W3C DWBP: Request to close Issue 38
>
>
>
> Not trying to be difficult here, but I still don’t think that Use Case #3
> Recife Open Data Portal mentions a requirement for selecting high-quality
> data. The phrase that maybe has some relevance to value is “*identify the
> sources of data that their pontential (sic!) consumers could find useful*”
> but that is a bit of a stretch. The requirement from that phrase should be
> something like R-SelectUsefulData which seems to be similar to
> R-SelectDemand. Or is there another sentence that I am overlooking?
>
>
>
> In addition, the Use Case does not mention in any way a requirement that
> the value “*should be indicated in a quantifiable manner/property*” –
> which I don’t understand at all. What is a “*manner/property*” and what
> kinds of quantifications should we think of? Maybe an example would help?
>
>
>
> Makx.
>
>
>
>
>
> Makx Dekkers
>
> makx@makxdekkers.com
>
> +34 639 26 11 46
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Lee, Deirdre [mailto:Deirdre.Lee@deri.org <Deirdre.Lee@deri.org>]
> *Sent:* Thursday, September 18, 2014 5:10 PM
> *To:* Makx Dekkers
> *Cc:* Bernadette Farias Lóscio
> *Subject:* W3C DWBP: Request to close Issue 38
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
> In one of the recent Friday telcos and/or on the email list we have
> discussed the following issue that you raised about the DWBP Use Case &
> Requirement (UCR):
>
>
> ISSUE-38: Review motivation for R-SelectHighValue
>
> https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/38
>
>
>
> Can you confirm that this issue has been addressed in the updated version
> of the UCR doc, available here:
> http://htmlpreview.github.io/?https://github.com/w3c/dwbp/blob/gh-pages/usecasesv1.html
>
> If you agree, I will close the issue.
>
> Kind regards,
> Deirdre
>
> Deirdre Lee, Research Associate, eGovernment Group
>
> Insight Center for Data Analytics, NUI Galway, Ireland
>
> Twitter: @deirdrelee, Skype: deirdrelee
>
> Linkedin: ie.linkedin.com/in/leedeirdre/
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Onderzoeker
> +31(0)6 14576494
> christophe.gueret@dans.knaw.nl
>
>
>
> *Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS)*
>
> DANS bevordert duurzame toegang tot digitale onderzoeksgegevens. Kijk op
> www.dans.knaw.nl voor meer informatie. DANS is een instituut van KNAW en
> NWO.
>
>
>
> Let op, per 1 januari hebben we een nieuw adres:
>
> DANS | Anna van Saksenlaan 51 | 2593 HW Den Haag | Postbus 93067 | 2509 AB
> Den Haag | +31 70 349 44 50 | info@dans.knaw.nl <info@dans.kn> |
> www.dans.knaw.nl
>
>
>
> *Let's build a World Wide Semantic Web!*
> http://worldwidesemanticweb.org/
>
>
> *e-Humanities Group (KNAW)*
> [image: eHumanities] <http://www.ehumanities.nl/>
>



-- 
Onderzoeker
+31(0)6 14576494
christophe.gueret@dans.knaw.nl

*Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS)*

DANS bevordert duurzame toegang tot digitale onderzoeksgegevens. Kijk op
www.dans.knaw.nl voor meer informatie. DANS is een instituut van KNAW en
NWO.


Let op, per 1 januari hebben we een nieuw adres:

DANS | Anna van Saksenlaan 51 | 2593 HW Den Haag | Postbus 93067 | 2509 AB
Den Haag | +31 70 349 44 50 | info@dans.knaw.nl <info@dans.kn> |
www.dans.knaw.nl


*Let's build a World Wide Semantic Web!*
http://worldwidesemanticweb.org/

*e-Humanities Group (KNAW)*
[image: eHumanities] <http://www.ehumanities.nl/>