RE: W3C DWBP: Request to close Issue 13

Hi,



I'm opening this issue back to the group. 'Use Case #15 - Documented Support and Release of Data' sets out two requirements that currently aren't included in our requirement list. I therefore propose the addition of these two requirements:



·         IncludeSupportMechanism

·         IncludeReleaseSchedule



Feedback on should these requirements be included and in what requirements section they should be included (metadata, data access, industry reuse?) is appreciated.



Cheers,

Deirdre





-----Original Message-----
From: Phil Archer [mailto:phila@w3.org]
Sent: 19 September 2014 13:22
To: Lee, Deirdre
Cc: Bernadette Farias Lóscio
Subject: Re: W3C DWBP: Request to close Issue 13







On 18/09/2014 15:53, Lee, Deirdre wrote:

> Hi,

>

> In one of the recent Friday telcos and/or on the email list we have discussed the following issue that you raised about the DWBP Use Case & Requirement (UCR):

>

> ISSUE-13: Improve Use case "Documented Support and Release of Data"

> https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/13

>

> Can you confirm that this issue has been addressed in the updated

> version of the UCR doc, available here:

> http://htmlpreview.github.io/?https://github.com/w3c/dwbp/blob/gh-page

> s/usecasesv1.html

>

> If you agree, I will close the issue.



Yes and no. I think it's really about the difference between potential requirement and requirement. There is a requirement to include info about the update cycle in the metadata, which has now been lost. I think I've caused confusion and extra work where I didn't mean to.



There's a bit of blurred line between a challenge and a requirement.

Both of the challenges listed can be rephrased as requirements.



How about the challenges as:

Provide information about the management cycle of the data and who is responsible for it.



Requirements:

AccessUptodate

SLAAvailable



Plus...



updateCycle (the data update cycle should be included in the metadata)



contactPoint (contact information for the data provider should be included in the metadata)



WDYT?



Phil.







>

> Kind regards,

> Deirdre

> Deirdre Lee, Research Associate, eGovernment Group Insight Center for

> Data Analytics, NUI Galway, Ireland

> Twitter: @deirdrelee, Skype: deirdrelee

> Linkedin:

> ie.linkedin.com/in/leedeirdre/<http://ie.linkedin.com/in/leedeirdre/>

>



--





Phil Archer

W3C Data Activity Lead

http://www.w3.org/2013/data/



http://philarcher.org

+44 (0)7887 767755

@philarcher1