public-dwbp-wg@w3.org from November 2014 by date

Friday, 28 November 2014

• Re: Half-day call Nathalia Sautchuk Patrício
• Re: Half-day call Yaso
• RE: ISSUE-69: Do we include versioning in the bp doc? currently there are no use cases for it Makx Dekkers
• Re: ISSUE-69: Do we include versioning in the bp doc? currently there are no use cases for it João Paulo Almeida
• Re: ISSUE-69: Do we include versioning in the bp doc? currently there are no use cases for it Christophe Guéret
• Re: dwbp-ACTION-132: Will write an email about what he understandes about the discussion on the uri document and mtcarrasco work to be put on the bp document Ghislain Atemezing
• dwbp-ACTION-132: Will write an email about what he understandes about the discussion on the uri document and mtcarrasco work to be put on the bp document Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• dwbp-ACTION-131: Will write about resource version Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: ISSUE-69: Do we include versioning in the bp doc? currently there are no use cases for it Ghislain Atemezing
• Re: ISSUE-69: Do we include versioning in the bp doc? currently there are no use cases for it Bernadette Farias Lóscio
• Granularity and version Manuel.CARRASCO-BENITEZ@ec.europa.eu
• Re: ISSUE-69: Do we include versioning in the bp doc? currently there are no use cases for it Christophe Guéret
• Re: ISSUE-69: Do we include versioning in the bp doc? currently there are no use cases for it Ghislain Atemezing
• Re: ISSUE-69: Do we include versioning in the bp doc? currently there are no use cases for it Christophe Guéret
• Re: agenda for next call 28/11 Christophe Guéret
• Re: ISSUE-69: Do we include versioning in the bp doc? currently there are no use cases for it Ghislain Atemezing
• Re: ISSUE-69: Do we include versioning in the bp doc? currently there are no use cases for it Ghislain Atemezing
• Re: ISSUE-69: Do we include versioning in the bp doc? currently there are no use cases for it Bernadette Farias Lóscio
• Re: Half-day call Nathalia Sautchuk Patrício
• Re: ISSUE-69: Do we include versioning in the bp doc? currently there are no use cases for it Christophe Guéret
• RE: ISSUE-69: Do we include versioning in the bp doc? currently there are no use cases for it Makx Dekkers
• RE: ISSUE-69: Do we include versioning in the bp doc? currently there are no use cases for it Makx Dekkers
• Re: ISSUE-69: Do we include versioning in the bp doc? currently there are no use cases for it Bernadette Farias Lóscio
• Re: ISSUE-69: Do we include versioning in the bp doc? currently there are no use cases for it Christophe Guéret
• Re: agenda for next call 28/11 Ig Ibert Bittencourt
• Re: ISSUE-69: Do we include versioning in the bp doc? currently there are no use cases for it Bernadette Farias Lóscio
• Re: agenda for next call 28/11 Hadley Beeman
• Re: ISSUE-69: Do we include versioning in the bp doc? currently there are no use cases for it Christophe Guéret

Thursday, 27 November 2014

• agenda for next call 28/11 Laufer
• Re: ISSUE-69: Do we include versioning in the bp doc? currently there are no use cases for it Ghislain Atemezing

Wednesday, 26 November 2014

• extraordinary meeting on monday -1/12/14 Yaso
• Re: Half-day call Yaso
• Re: Half-day call Annette Greiner
• Re: DWBP document - general information Newton Calegari
• Re: DWBP document - general information Bernadette Farias Lóscio
• Re: Half-day call Yaso
• agenda for next call 28/11 Yaso
• Re: Half-day call Bernadette Farias Lóscio
• Re: Half-day call Christophe Guéret

Tuesday, 25 November 2014

• Re: Half-day call Antoine Isaac
• Re: Half-day call Newton Calejaria
• Re: Half-day call Ig Ibert Bittencourt
• Re: Half-day call Phil Archer
• Re: Half-day call Makx Dekkers
• Re: Half-day call Caroline Burle
• Re: Half-day call Steven Adler
• Half-day call Yaso
• Re: DWBP document - general information Christophe Guéret

Friday, 21 November 2014

• [2014-11-21] Minutes and an action for you Phil Archer
• Re: Agenda for friday Hadley Beeman
• Apologies for Lewis McGibbney Mcgibbney, Lewis J (398M)

Thursday, 20 November 2014

• Re: dwbp-ISSUE-79 (metatype): Discovery vs structural metadata [Best practices document(s)] Bernadette Farias Lóscio
• Re: ISSUE-78 Bernadette Farias Lóscio
• Re: dwbp-ISSUE-94 (Git for data): Dataset versioning and dataset replication [Use Cases & Requirements Document] Bernadette Farias Lóscio
• Re: DWBP document - general information Bernadette Farias Lóscio
• Re: Agenda for friday Yaso

Wednesday, 19 November 2014

• ACTION-71 Work out goals for data quality vocab by tpac Antoine Isaac
• Re: Agenda for fryday Antoine Isaac
• Re: DWBP document - general information Christophe Guéret
• Re: DWBP document - general information Bernadette Farias Lóscio
• Re: DWBP document - general information Christophe Guéret
• Re: DWBP document - general information Bernadette Farias Lóscio
• Re: DWBP document - general information Christophe Guéret
• DWBP document - general information Bernadette Farias Lóscio

Tuesday, 18 November 2014

• Re: dwbp-ISSUE-94 (Git for data): Dataset versioning and dataset replication [Use Cases & Requirements Document] Annette Greiner
• Re: dwbp-ISSUE-94 (Git for data): Dataset versioning and dataset replication [Use Cases & Requirements Document] Bart van Leeuwen
• ISSUE-78 Bart van Leeuwen
• Re: Agenda for friday Yaso
• Re: dwbp-ISSUE-94 (Git for data): Dataset versioning and dataset replication [Use Cases & Requirements Document] Yaso
• Re: dwbp-ACTION-117: Explore the use cases that might clarify the need for uri and url design Annette Greiner
• Re: Agenda for fryday Nathalia Sautchuk Patrício
• Agenda for fryday Yaso
• We Need Much More Data Steven Adler
• Re: dwbp-ACTION-117: Explore the use cases that might clarify the need for uri and url design Christophe Guéret
• RE: dwbp-ISSUE-79 (metatype): Discovery vs structural metadata [Best practices document(s)] Christophe Guéret

Monday, 17 November 2014

• Re: ISSUE-80: We need a definition of "dataset" Steven Adler

Sunday, 16 November 2014

• Re: ISSUE-80: We need a definition of "dataset" Laufer

Saturday, 15 November 2014

• Re: ISSUE-80: We need a definition of "dataset" Eric Stephan

Friday, 14 November 2014

• Re: Agenda for tomorrow Mcgibbney, Lewis J (398M)
• Re: Is use of Data Cube Vocabulary for an observation-less catalog considered harmful? Sarven Capadisli
• RE: Is use of Data Cube Vocabulary for an observation-less catalog considered harmful? Ed Staub
• RE: ISSUE-80: We need a definition of "dataset" Makx Dekkers
• Re: ISSUE-80: We need a definition of "dataset" Laufer
• dwbp-ACTION-130: Review issues around ucr and contact individual use case authors to review them in the light of current issues and create relevant actions Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• Issues Vs BP Document Caroline Burle
• RE: ISSUE-80: We need a definition of "dataset" Makx Dekkers
• Re: Agenda for tomorrow Bart van Leeuwen
• Re: Is use of Data Cube Vocabulary for an observation-less catalog considered harmful? Christophe Guéret
• Regrets Re: Agenda for tomorrow Carlos Iglesias

Thursday, 13 November 2014

• Is use of Data Cube Vocabulary for an observation-less catalog considered harmful? Ed Staub
• Re: ISSUE-80: We need a definition of "dataset" Ed Staub
• RE: Agenda for tomorrow Lee, Deirdre
• Re: Agenda for tomorrow Mcgibbney, Lewis J (398M)
• Re: dwbp-ISSUE-94 (Git for data): Dataset versioning and dataset replication [Use Cases & Requirements Document] Augusto Herrmann
• Agenda for tomorrow Lee, Deirdre
• dwbp-ISSUE-99 (Timeline): Our timelines are hopelessly out of date... Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• dwbp-ISSUE-98 (R-QualityOpinions): R-QualityOpinions and R-IncorporateFeedback seem to be duplicates? [Use Cases & Requirements Document] Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker

Wednesday, 12 November 2014

• Re: dwbp-ISSUE-94 (Git for data): Dataset versioning and dataset replication [Use Cases & Requirements Document] Yaso

Tuesday, 11 November 2014

• Re: dwbp-ISSUE-94 (Git for data): Dataset versioning and dataset replication [Use Cases & Requirements Document] Annette Greiner
• Re: dwbp-ISSUE-94 (Git for data): Dataset versioning and dataset replication [Use Cases & Requirements Document] Yaso
• dwbp-ISSUE-97 (Axoims in UCR): Should we include the three axioms in the UCR [Use Cases & Requirements Document] Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• datacube-validator issues Jürgen Jakobitsch
• Re: ISSUE-80: We need a definition of "dataset" Eric Stephan
• Re: ISSUE-80: We need a definition of "dataset" Phil Archer
• Re: Canceling Vocabulary calls? Eric
• Re: Canceling Vocabulary calls? Makx Dekkers
• Re: ISSUE-80: We need a definition of "dataset" Makx Dekkers
• Re: Canceling Vocabulary calls? Bernadette Farias Lóscio
• Re: ISSUE-80: We need a definition of "dataset" Laufer
• Re: Addressing ACTION-102 Bernadette Farias Lóscio
• Re: ISSUE-80: We need a definition of "dataset" Bernadette Farias Lóscio
• Re: New Ed Draft of UCR Bernadette Farias Lóscio
• RE: New Ed Draft of UCR Lee, Deirdre
• Re: ISSUE-80: We need a definition of "dataset" Eric

Saturday, 8 November 2014

• Re: ISSUE-80: We need a definition of "dataset" Adriano C. Machado Pereira

Monday, 10 November 2014

• Re: BP Doc skeleton on GitHub Bernadette Farias Lóscio
• Re: ISSUE-80: We need a definition of "dataset" Bernadette Farias Lóscio
• New Ed Draft of UCR Phil Archer
• dwbp-ISSUE-96 (Share-PSI): Is the WG happy with the Share-PSI use case [Use Cases & Requirements Document] Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• dwbp-ISSUE-95 (MSI): Requirements derived from MSI use case [Use Cases & Requirements Document] Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• dwbp-ISSUE-94 (Git for data): Dataset versioning and dataset replication [Use Cases & Requirements Document] Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• dwbp-ISSUE-93 (Open SLAs): Free Open Data SLAs for Open Data publishing [Use Cases & Requirements Document] Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• dwbp-ISSUE-92 (Dropping Formats): OK to drop last word of 'Requirements for Data Formats' from challenges/req list? [Use Cases & Requirements Document] Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• dwbp-ISSUE-91 (R-Location): New req: Locations (countries, regions, cities etc.) must be referred to consistently [Use Cases & Requirements Document] Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• dwbp-ISSUE-90 (R-UsageFeedback): new req: Data consumers should have a way of sharing feedback and rating data [Use Cases & Requirements Document] Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• dwbp-ISSUE-89 (R-SoftwareDataUsage): New req: Data should be annotated with descriptions of software applications using the data [Use Cases & Requirements Document] Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• dwbp-ISSUE-88 (R-DesignatedThingsServiceProviders): New req: Data produced by things or services should be associated with complete things/services metadata descriptions. [Use Cases & Requirements Document] Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• dwbp-ISSUE-87 (R-DesignatedUserExpertise): New req: Data should be designated if either by virtue of its complexity or its nature is relevant to users with specific expertise. [Use Cases & Requirements Document] Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• dwbp-ISSUE-86 (R-DataIrreproducibility): New req: Data should be designated if it is irreproducible [Use Cases & Requirements Document] Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• dwbp-ISSUE-85 (R-DataLifecycleStage): New Req: Data should be identified by a designated lifecycle stage [Data Usage Vocabulary] Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: Addressing ACTION-102 Mcgibbney, Lewis J (398M)
• dwbp-ISSUE-84 (Portal resilience): Should DCAT include a pointer to a mirror/back up? [Quality & Granularity Vocabulary] Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: Canceling Vocabulary calls? Antoine Isaac
• dwbp-ISSUE-83 (LuSTRE): New Reqs from LuSTRE Use Case [Use Cases & Requirements Document] Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker

Sunday, 9 November 2014

• Re: ISSUE-80: We need a definition of "dataset" Laufer
• Re: ISSUE-80: We need a definition of "dataset" Phil Archer

Saturday, 8 November 2014

• Canceling Vocabulary calls? Eric
• Re: ISSUE-80: We need a definition of "dataset" Laufer
• Re: ISSUE-80: We need a definition of "dataset" Phil Archer
• Re: ISSUE-80: We need a definition of "dataset" Phil Archer
• Re: ISSUE-80: We need a definition of "dataset" Antoine Isaac
• Re: ISSUE-80: We need a definition of "dataset" Ig Ibert Bittencourt
• RE: dwbp-ISSUE-79 (metatype): Discovery vs structural metadata [Best practices document(s)] Makx Dekkers
• Re: ISSUE-81: Is the best practices template still right? http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/bp.html Yaso

Friday, 7 November 2014

• Re: ISSUE-80: We need a definition of "dataset" Yaso
• Re: ISSUE-80: We need a definition of "dataset" Laufer
• Re: ISSUE-80: We need a definition of "dataset" Annette Greiner
• Re: ISSUE-80: We need a definition of "dataset" Makx Dekkers
• Re: ISSUE-80: We need a definition of "dataset" Steven Adler
• Re: ISSUE-80: We need a definition of "dataset" Makx Dekkers
• Re: ISSUE-80: We need a definition of "dataset" Christophe Guéret
• Re: dwbp-ISSUE-82 (Dataset): What is the definition of a dataset? [Best practices document(s)] Christophe Guéret
• Re: ISSUE-80: We need a definition of "dataset" Phil Archer
• dwbp-ISSUE-82 (Dataset): What is the definition of a dataset? [Best practices document(s)] Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• dwbp-ACTION-129: Write a use case focusing on versioning (ref issue 69) Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• dwbp-ACTION-128: Bring out the versioning issues in his use case (ref issue 69) Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-81: Is the best practices template still right? http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/bp.html Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-80: We need a definition of "dataset" Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: Timing of today's call Laufer
• BP Doc skeleton on GitHub Phil Archer
• Timing of today's call Phil Archer
• Re: dwbp-ISSUE-79 (metatype): Discovery vs structural metadata [Best practices document(s)] Christophe Guéret

Thursday, 6 November 2014

• Re: dwbp-ACTION-109: And annette to write a use case about real-time and bulk data Eric Stephan
• Addressing ACTION-102 Mcgibbney, Lewis J (398M)
• Agenda for tomorrow Hadley Beeman
• dwbp-ISSUE-79 (metatype): Discovery vs structural metadata [Best practices document(s)] Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: Working Group Telecon tomorrow? Steven Adler
• Re: Working Group Telecon tomorrow? Eric Stephan
• Re: Working Group Telecon tomorrow? Ig Ibert Bittencourt
• Re: Working Group Telecon tomorrow? Yaso
• Working Group Telecon tomorrow? Eric Stephan

Wednesday, 5 November 2014

• RE: Table of Contents DWBP Manuel.CARRASCO-BENITEZ@ec.europa.eu
• Re: Table of Contents DWBP Christophe Guéret
• The Next Wave is People Data Steven Adler

Tuesday, 4 November 2014

• RE: dwbp-ACTION-117: Explore the use cases that might clarify the need for uri and url design Makx Dekkers
• RE: dwbp-ACTION-117: Explore the use cases that might clarify the need for uri and url design Manuel.CARRASCO-BENITEZ@ec.europa.eu
• RE: Table of Contents DWBP Manuel.CARRASCO-BENITEZ@ec.europa.eu

Monday, 3 November 2014

• Re: TPAC 2014 Steven Adler
• Re: ISSUE-73: What exactly is the audience for the bp doc? Bernadette Farias Lóscio
• Re: ISSUE-73: What exactly is the audience for the bp doc? Ghislain Atemezing
• Re: ISSUE-73: What exactly is the audience for the bp doc? Bernadette Farias Lóscio
• Re: ISSUE-73: What exactly is the audience for the bp doc? Ig Ibert Bittencourt
• Re: ISSUE-73: What exactly is the audience for the bp doc? Ghislain Atemezing

Last message date: Friday, 28 November 2014 17:05:39 UTC