UCR issues

Dear all,

I've exploited the cancellation of today's meeting for long-due housekeeping: checking the issues I had raised for the use cases and requirements!

In fact I've realized that Deirdree and Bernadette have fixed some of them, and that notes are available to explain how that was done, for example [1]
However I don't think this edition of issues in the tracker has resulted in any message being sent to the group. That's a pity, it's always nice to see an issue being worked on - especially after having received the mail that it's been opened [2] ;-)

So now I'm going to send emails, hoping that the tracker will make the link with the issues I mention...

ISSUE-20 Review use cases organization - change the order [1]
is pending review -> I agree with the solution and suggest to close it. Great job!

ISSUE-21 Remove conformance section [3]
has been closed -> OK

ISSUE-22 Add reference to Use case #5 [4]
has been closed -> OK, though with the re-ordering there might now be mentions of the Open Data principles that have been moved of the one where the link has been put.

ISSUE-24 Remove bio details [5]
is pending review -> I am happy with the fix, I suggest to close it.

ISSUE-30 Change names of requirements: R-Persistent and R-PersArchiving [6]
has been closed -> OK

More to come in a couple of mails.



[1] https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/20
[2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-dwbp-wg/2014Jun/0026.html
[3] https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/21
[4] https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/22
[5] https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/24
[6] https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/30

Received on Friday, 18 July 2014 14:15:07 UTC