- From: Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2014 11:36:23 +0100
- To: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
- CC: 'Public DWBP WG' <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>
Thanks Markus, I need to focus on other things this week but I hope to get back to it next week. And yes, all I did to create the draft DCAT context file was to copy and edit your work on HYDRA. Basic Qs: - should W3C create LD-context files for vocabs and serve them via conneg alongside Turtle, RDF/XML and HTML? - if so, do we include the mappings for all the terms (i.e. all the Dublin Core stuff in DCAT for example) or just the terms defined in that namespace? - if we should include the other namespace mappings then should that context file be somewhere other than the namespace? - and if you can show me how the heck to extend the context file to include all the language variations I'm very pleased that DCAT includes, that would be grand... ;-) (do I really have to define dataset_ar @language ar etc.?? looks horrible!) And we need the non-LD take on all this to prove that it's useful (I'm sure it is but we need evidence). Thanks Phil. On 16/07/2014 11:27, Markus Lanthaler wrote: > Hi Phil, > > On 13 Jul 2014 at 22:25, Phil Archer wrote: >> I still have more playing to do to really get to grips with how one >> might use JSON-LD to describe a dataset in a catalog but I've made a >> start by creating a rough context file for DCAT [1]. More to do but the >> basics are there if others want to play. I have lots of questions to >> which I don't know the answers... > > Just ask :-) I'm more than happy to help... > > [From your other mail below] >>> I need to spend more time on this (and others are welcome to as well of >>> course) but what I believe this this gives us is a way for people to >>> use, say DCAT in JSON just using terms like >>> >>> title >>> theme >>> homepage >>> >>> without needing to know or care that all three of those come from >>> different namespaces. >>> >>> I hope I've got that right (I'll check with the Hydra folks). > > Yep, that's right > > > Cheers, > Markus > > > > -- > Markus Lanthaler > @markuslanthaler > > > >> [1] http://philarcher.org/dcat/dcat.jsonld >> >> On 11/07/2014 12:43, Phil Archer wrote: >>> During yesterday's vocabs call, Eric S took an action to work with a >>> member of the PNNL team to look at JSON-LD as a means of making our >>> vocabs less Linked Data centric. >>> >>> It bothered me that I couldn't immediately jump in and take care of this >>> so I've been doing some digging/self-teaching and ended up looking at >>> the JSON-LD Context file [1] created by the Hydra CG [2]. That's a >>> pretty good place to end up as the people behind that Community group >>> include a lot of the JSON-LD authors. >>> >>> I need to spend more time on this (and others are welcome to as well of >>> course) but what I believe this this gives us is a way for people to >>> use, say DCAT in JSON just using terms like >>> >>> title >>> theme >>> homepage >>> >>> without needing to know or care that all three of those come from >>> different namespaces. >>> >>> I hope I've got that right (I'll check with the Hydra folks). >>> >>> Cheers for now >>> >>> Phil. >>> >>> >>> [1] http://www.hydra-cg.com/spec/latest/core/core.jsonld >>> [2] http://www.w3.org/community/hydra/ >>> >>> >>> >> > > -- Phil Archer W3C Data Activity Lead http://www.w3.org/2013/data/ http://philarcher.org +44 (0)7887 767755 @philarcher1
Received on Wednesday, 16 July 2014 10:36:39 UTC