Re: dwbp-ISSUE-27: Review requirements for metadata, license, provenance and vocabularies to include as data pubication principles from Antoine Isaac on 2014-08-22 (public-dwbp-wg@w3.org from August 2014)

From: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2014 13:42:07 +0200
To: <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <53F72C8F.2040908@few.vu.nl>

I would agree, but then one should not that ISSUE-29 should get rid of all the redundant 'open', 'standardized', machine-readable', 'interoperable' and 'documented'.

Antoine

On 8/4/14 5:29 PM, Lee, Deirdre wrote:
> Propose to close as duplicate of ISSUE-29
>
> Product:
>
> Use Cases & Requirements Document <https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/products/1>
>
> Raised by:
>
> Antoine Isaac <https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/users/>
>
> Opened on:
>
> 2014-06-03
>
> Description:
>
> The number of requirements for metadata, license, provenance and vocabularies could be lowered: 'open', 'standardized', machine-readable', 'interoperable' and 'documented' are all data publication principles that we could formulate and recommend at a higher level (it is 'meta' level, in fact)
>
> Related Actions Items:
>
> No related actions
>

Received on Friday, 22 August 2014 11:42:35 UTC